RE: Charlottesville: Guns vs. Free Speech

Join Our Community

Collarchat.com

Home Login Search

RE: Charlottesville: Guns vs. Free Speech

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Charlottesville: Guns vs. Free Speech

Page: << < prev 4 5 [6] 7 8 next > >>

Login

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Charlottesville: Guns vs. Free Speech - 8/19/2017 4:46:02 PM

Posts: 5490
Status: offline

quote:

The really scary part is that a dimwit like him taught college classes.

Not in the least, he is doing the most important thing a university professor can do: ask questions that require one to think for oneself before answering. The really scary thing is that you don't understand that.

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to tamaka)

RE: Charlottesville: Guns vs. Free Speech - 8/19/2017 4:47:47 PM

Posts: 5490
Status: offline

Funny, the only real leftist on this board is the only one actually answering based on facts, all the right wing dicks are answering based on their feelings.
Talk about your yummy irony. :)

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to bounty44)

RE: Charlottesville: Guns vs. Free Speech - 8/19/2017 4:51:47 PM

Posts: 5079
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

The really scary part is that a dimwit like him taught college classes.

Not in the least, he is doing the most important thing a university professor can do: ask questions that require one to think for oneself before answering. The really scary thing is that you don't understand that.

I understand that. I've also read enough of his posts to see he isn't very bright. He just thinks he is. Kinda like you.

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)

RE: Charlottesville: Guns vs. Free Speech - 8/19/2017 4:53:11 PM

Posts: 5079
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

Funny, the only real leftist on this board is the only one actually answering based on facts, all the right wing dicks are answering based on their feelings.
Talk about your yummy irony. :)

Alternative facts. No irony there.

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)

RE: Charlottesville: Guns vs. Free Speech - 8/19/2017 4:55:14 PM

Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

i don't disagree that the left bases their decisions more on feelings than on rational thought and that's one of the things that makes conversing with them absolutely maddening.

however that said, at some point, if one never progresses much past "because feelings" we remain perpetually mired in a state akin to a teen-age girl going through puberty.

Laughable bollocks coming from someone who wants to get people banned because they have hurt his feelings.

Bounty, forever akin to a teenage girl going through puberty. ( Sexist crap if ever I saw it )

(in reply to bounty44)

RE: Charlottesville: Guns vs. Free Speech - 8/19/2017 4:57:26 PM

Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: stef

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX
The car ramming the antifa crowd wasn't terrorism, it was a part of a gang fight wherein both sides were using deadly force

I find myself wondering why people want to make the distinction between "terrorism" and "vehicular homicide?"

(or maybe we'll end up with manslaughter even)

ive only seen one quick clip of the car scene, but as I reflect on it more, I also wonder if the guy was bent on inflicting as much harm as possible on the protestors, why he didn't keep driving. he could have killed and injured many more.

now please brain dead lefties---try not to turn that into my stating that's what I wished would have happened. think you could do that??

He drove until he smashed into two cars...idiot

Looks like Bounty has finally gone full retard. I guess he can be added to the ignore bin with the rest of the deplorables.

notice the part where I said "one quick clip?"

also, since I asked the question, that clearly implies I hadn't seen that he smashed into two cars.

and even then, supposing that I did see that, what is to stop him from backing up and continuing in another direction? smashing into two cars is not the only possible explanation for his stopping.

now---tell me again who is the "idiot" and the "full retard?" get the point?

if you are going to act all intellectually superior, youre just going to have to do lots better.

(in reply to stef)

RE: Charlottesville: Guns vs. Free Speech - 8/19/2017 4:59:58 PM

Posts: 5490
Status: offline

LOL
Awww, isn't that cute, the most vacuous poster in this forum thinks she can recognise intelligence. Hard not to....oh fuck it...

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to tamaka)

RE: Charlottesville: Guns vs. Free Speech - 8/19/2017 5:01:49 PM

Posts: 5079
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

LOL
Awww, isn't that cute, the most vacuous poster in this forum thinks she can recognise intelligence. Hard not to....oh fuck it...

I'm glad something made you laugh. God knows you need to.

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)

RE: Charlottesville: Guns vs. Free Speech - 8/19/2017 5:07:35 PM

Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji
I would also like to point out that at the time Fox News started there were "NO" conservative news sources on TV. Because of that FOx isn't, nor should it have to be, apologetic about being right leaning. it was brought about by the Dan Rathers of the world.

yet at the same time, fox, as I continually point out, is full of people from a variety of political persuasions both as hosts, regular commentators and guests.

there is no monolithic "fox news position" or "fox news talking point."

(in reply to Nnanji)

RE: Charlottesville: Guns vs. Free Speech - 8/19/2017 5:22:44 PM

Posts: 5079
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji
I would also like to point out that at the time Fox News started there were "NO" conservative news sources on TV. Because of that FOx isn't, nor should it have to be, apologetic about being right leaning. it was brought about by the Dan Rathers of the world.

yet at the same time, fox, as I continually point out, is full of people from a variety of political persuasions both as hosts, regular commentators and guests.

there is no monolithic "fox news position" or "fox news talking point."

Well we certainly don't want to hear from any other perspectives than the slanderous radical left. So even a 'balanced' approach is unacceptable!

(in reply to bounty44)

RE: Charlottesville: Guns vs. Free Speech - 8/19/2017 5:26:21 PM

Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

The really scary part is that a dimwit like him taught college classes.

Not in the least, he is doing the most important thing a university professor can do: ask questions that require one to think for oneself before answering. The really scary thing is that you don't understand that.

I understand that. I've also read enough of his posts to see he isn't very bright. He just thinks he is. Kinda like you.

if you two are talking about maniacalmystery, ive seen absolutely nothing in his posts that would influence me to believe he has the intellectual chops to be a college faculty. I see just the opposite actually.

< Message edited by bounty44 -- 8/19/2017 5:45:20 PM >

(in reply to tamaka)

RE: Charlottesville: Guns vs. Free Speech - 8/19/2017 5:29:01 PM

Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji
I would also like to point out that at the time Fox News started there were "NO" conservative news sources on TV. Because of that FOx isn't, nor should it have to be, apologetic about being right leaning. it was brought about by the Dan Rathers of the world.

yet at the same time, fox, as I continually point out, is full of people from a variety of political persuasions both as hosts, regular commentators and guests.

there is no monolithic "fox news position" or "fox news talking point."

Well we certainly don't want to hear from any other perspectives than the slanderous radical left. So even a 'balanced' approach is unacceptable!

ive often wondered why the lefties criticize fox so much. certainly some of it is because it is, in many instances a "voice from the right" but my contention is, for the most part, the critics don't actually watch it or theyd be seeing their fellow comrades on the shows, sharing their views.

(in reply to tamaka)

[Awaiting Approval]

Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline

[Awaiting Approval]

RE: Charlottesville: Guns vs. Free Speech - 8/19/2017 6:06:33 PM

Posts: 5490
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

LOL
Awww, isn't that cute, the most vacuous poster in this forum thinks she can recognise intelligence. Hard not to....oh fuck it...

I'm glad something made you laugh. God knows you need to.

Oh no dear, I laugh at you dumb fuckers all the time.

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to tamaka)

RE: Charlottesville: Guns vs. Free Speech - 8/19/2017 6:22:00 PM

Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

The really scary part is that a dimwit like him taught college classes.

Not in the least, he is doing the most important thing a university professor can do: ask questions that require one to think for oneself before answering. The really scary thing is that you don't understand that.

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)

RE: Charlottesville: Guns vs. Free Speech - 8/19/2017 6:29:33 PM

Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

The really scary part is that a dimwit like him taught college classes.

Not in the least, he is doing the most important thing a university professor can do: ask questions that require one to think for oneself before answering. The really scary thing is that you don't understand that.

Was it Hume that said there is absolutely nothing a professor can provide to you that can't be found in a book? I guess some have to be lead to water before they'll drink. Those are probably better described as kool aid drinkers.

(in reply to Nnanji)

RE: Charlottesville: Guns vs. Free Speech - 8/19/2017 7:37:15 PM

Posts: 32566
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick
The government cannot tell you where you can or cannot carry a gun, but a private entity can (at least on their property).

I'm guessing you've never lived on a military base.

Completely irrelevant. RTFC.

I'm curious. Why do you think a private entity can, as you say, on their property, but Uncle Sam can't on HIS property? I'm wondering about your thought process.

_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)

RE: Charlottesville: Guns vs. Free Speech - 8/19/2017 7:53:10 PM

Posts: 357
Joined: 8/21/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick
The government cannot tell you where you can or cannot carry a gun, but a private entity can (at least on their property).

I'm guessing you've never lived on a military base.

Completely irrelevant. RTFC.

I'm curious. Why do you think a private entity can, as you say, on their property, but Uncle Sam can't on HIS property? I'm wondering about your thought process.

I think that refers to the fact that when you enter the service you sign paperwork agreeing to follow orders and that on most bases the orders are that only MPs/SPs are authorized to run about the base carrying weapons.
That may have changed on a lot of bases though since the Fort Hood incident. It's up to the base commander to set that sort of policy, but it has been traditionally prohibited on base whenever we were not in active wartime conditions.

(in reply to LadyPact)

RE: Charlottesville: Guns vs. Free Speech - 8/19/2017 7:59:57 PM

Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

i don't disagree that the left bases their decisions more on feelings than on rational thought and that's one of the things that makes conversing with them absolutely maddening.

however that said, at some point, if one never progresses much past "because feelings" we remain perpetually mired in a state akin to a teen-age girl going through puberty.

Laughable bollocks coming from someone who wants to get people banned because they have hurt his feelings.

Bounty, forever akin to a teenage girl going through puberty. ( Sexist crap if ever I saw it )

I don't understand your "sexist crap". Boys go through puberty and girls go through puberty. Both do it differently. Saying it's like one and not saying it's like the other or both isn't sexist in my mind. How is it sexist in yours. For instance saying, "it's like watching a girl in a bikini walk along the beach". Is that sexist too? Must everything be gender neutral in order to not be sexist?

(in reply to Politesub53)

RE: Charlottesville: Guns vs. Free Speech - 8/19/2017 8:02:16 PM

Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka

Your assumption is that they want to understand. They don't. They live on emotional energy and that's why they like graphics so much.

That makes so much sense

Like meth addicts who get a rush from their drug, leftists get a rush from pretending that they have smashed a point over their "enemies'" heads, regardless of how ridiculous they are being

It's an endorphin thing for them

Well, that and this:

http://blog.dilbert.com/post/164297628606/how-to-know-youre-in-a-mass-hysteria-bubble

(in reply to BoscoX)

Page: << < prev 4 5 [6] 7 8 next > >>

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Charlottesville: Guns vs. Free Speech

Page: << < prev 4 5 [6] 7 8 next > >>

Jump to:

New Messages	No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages	Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages	Locked w/o New Messages

Post New Thread

Reply to Message

Post New Poll

Submit Vote

Delete My Own Post

Delete My Own Thread

Rate Posts

Collarchat.com © 2024

Terms of Service

0.117