Another Terrorist Attack In France (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


BoscoX -> Another Terrorist Attack In France (8/21/2017 3:40:44 PM)


Bet it was them damn Nazis again

Vehicle rams into bus shelters in Marseille kills one

I'm thinking maybe we shouldn't import any of them, if we can help it




PeonForHer -> RE: Another Terrorist Attack In France (8/21/2017 3:43:43 PM)

Thanks for bringing this to us, Bosco. I know how deeply it must have hurt a sensitive soul such as your own to talk of such an awful matter. Well done, though, for not trying to score small-minded political points out of it, as I'm sure many would.




BoscoX -> RE: Another Terrorist Attack In France (8/21/2017 3:52:42 PM)


Didn't you know, or haven't you heard

Calling everyone Nazis then punching them, denying them their rights, even their very humanity is all the rage




BamaD -> RE: Another Terrorist Attack In France (8/21/2017 4:45:02 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


Bet it was them damn Nazis again

Vehicle rams into bus shelters in Marseille kills one

I'm thinking maybe we shouldn't import any of them, if we can help it

Before anyone whines, this is a tragedy for the families.




jlf1961 -> RE: Another Terrorist Attack In France (8/21/2017 4:47:49 PM)

Why is it, that when a fucking stupid fanatic runs down a group of people with a car or van, in any other country, its an act of terrorism, but when the same thing happens here, it is anything but?




Rule -> RE: Another Terrorist Attack In France (8/21/2017 4:50:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX
Vehicle rams into bus shelters in Marseille kills one

I blame the bus shelters. If there had been no bus shelters, the car could not have rammed them and then nobody would have been killed.




BoscoX -> RE: Another Terrorist Attack In France (8/21/2017 4:50:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


Bet it was them damn Nazis again

Vehicle rams into bus shelters in Marseille kills one

I'm thinking maybe we shouldn't import any of them, if we can help it

Before anyone whines, this is a tragedy for the families.


Of course it is, that goes without saying

Hundreds of millions slaughtered, so much anguish, hell on earth and and misery through the years




BoscoX -> RE: Another Terrorist Attack In France (8/21/2017 4:52:30 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Why is it, that when a fucking stupid fanatic runs down a group of people with a car or van, in any other country, its an act of terrorism, but when the same thing happens here, it is anything but?


I keep repeating - we shouldn't import any Nazis.

Isn't that good enough for you?




jlf1961 -> RE: Another Terrorist Attack In France (8/21/2017 5:13:26 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Why is it, that when a fucking stupid fanatic runs down a group of people with a car or van, in any other country, its an act of terrorism, but when the same thing happens here, it is anything but?


I keep repeating - we shouldn't import any Nazis.

Isn't that good enough for you?



Has nothing to do with Nazis.

What it has to do is:
In another country, if a Muslim does this, its an act of terrorism.

If a socialist does this in another country, its an act of terrorism.

If a racist does this in another country, its an act of terrorism.

The same is true with bombings, mass shootings etc.

However, in the US, if any one but a Muslim does this or the other crimes I mentioned, it is anything but an act of terrorism.

Why?

Is it because they were born something other than Muslim?

Its the same fucked up mindset, just a different philosophy or ideology, but the act and result are the same.

If there are deaths resulting from an act of domestic terrorism, under federal statute, the penalty is death (unless a plea bargain is made.)

As vehicular manslaughter, the guy can get a max of 15 years and qualify for parole in half.

If you add a hate crime rider to it, double the years.

Its bullshit.




BoscoX -> RE: Another Terrorist Attack In France (8/21/2017 6:00:16 PM)


You understand that Mohammad developed and taught terrorism as a deliberate battle strategy, right? And that the Koran still teaches that very strategy, in the holy jihad for global domination in the name of Allah?

When people are sufficiently terrorized they lose their will to fight or resist, and they either flee or willingly convert. Submit themselves to their slave status to the bloodthirsty god Allah, as Muslims

So, the fact that Muslims commit deliberate acts of terror, has a lot to do with why their terrorist attacks are called terrorist attacks. Now, tell us - what worldwide cult or ideology taught the kid in Charlottesville to drive his car through that crowd, as a part of a larger plan to enslave the planet in the name of some bloodthirsty god or some Nazi master race or whatever

Or did the kid do it out of rage, after being savaged by antifa fascists who were attacking protesters there




BamaD -> RE: Another Terrorist Attack In France (8/21/2017 6:04:27 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Why is it, that when a fucking stupid fanatic runs down a group of people with a car or van, in any other country, its an act of terrorism, but when the same thing happens here, it is anything but?


I keep repeating - we shouldn't import any Nazis.

Isn't that good enough for you?



Has nothing to do with Nazis.

What it has to do is:
In another country, if a Muslim does this, its an act of terrorism.

If a socialist does this in another country, its an act of terrorism.

If a racist does this in another country, its an act of terrorism.

The same is true with bombings, mass shootings etc.

However, in the US, if any one but a Muslim does this or the other crimes I mentioned, it is anything but an act of terrorism.

Why?

Is it because they were born something other than Muslim?

Its the same fucked up mindset, just a different philosophy or ideology, but the act and result are the same.

If there are deaths resulting from an act of domestic terrorism, under federal statute, the penalty is death (unless a plea bargain is made.)

As vehicular manslaughter, the guy can get a max of 15 years and qualify for parole in half.

If you add a hate crime rider to it, double the years.

Its bullshit.

I am not defending the Nazi so don't et me wrong.
If he got in the situation and panicked that is one thing.
If he went there to kill people that is another.
Both are wrong but they are different crimess




Greta75 -> RE: Another Terrorist Attack In France (8/21/2017 6:08:03 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Why is it, that when a fucking stupid fanatic runs down a group of people with a car or van, in any other country, its an act of terrorism, but when the same thing happens here, it is anything but?

Because, in VA, it was the counter protestors who attacked first, and got attacked back.

Whereas in Europe, all these car ramming, were terrorists on innocent people who didn't physically attack them.

How can it be called a terrorist attack in VA when the so-called "victims" got violent first towards the Nazi?

It's such an obvious and huge distinction to me.

The only hypocritical thing is. Because Nazi is evil, EVEN when the "Good guys" were violent and attacked them first, displaying bad behaviour. And the Nazi retaliate. It's always the Nazi fault, because the Nazi were suppose to just stand there, and allow the counter protesters to attack them and not defend themselves from the counter protesters.

It's hypocritical. For me, I am disgusted by the counter protesters behaviour in VA. And also disgusted that they try to blame the Nazi for being the violent ones, WHEN they were no better themselves.

It's all thug-like behaviour. The Counter-Protesters were NOT the better role model in that VA incident. They were out there to incite violence. Just watch all the videos evidence. The counter protesters were not innocent bystanders.




BoscoX -> RE: Another Terrorist Attack In France (8/21/2017 6:54:30 PM)


It was Nazis vs. Communists, who have been fighting for 100 years. Trump called both bad, and the leftist media went nuts. Fact is, Nazis killed 6 million Jews while communists killed 100 million of their own people.




Wayward5oul -> RE: Another Terrorist Attack In France (8/21/2017 7:16:49 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Why is it, that when a fucking stupid fanatic runs down a group of people with a car or van, in any other country, its an act of terrorism, but when the same thing happens here, it is anything but?

Because, in VA, it was the counter protestors who attacked first, and got attacked back.


Do you have a cite for that? It is this another case of you making shit up as you go along to fit your narrative?





Nnanji -> RE: Another Terrorist Attack In France (8/21/2017 7:28:32 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Why is it, that when a fucking stupid fanatic runs down a group of people with a car or van, in any other country, its an act of terrorism, but when the same thing happens here, it is anything but?

Because, in VA, it was the counter protestors who attacked first, and got attacked back.

quote:


Do you have a cite for that? It is this another case of you making shit up as you go along to fit your narrative?



For days I've seen conflicting reports, anyone of which may turn out to be the case. I know at least one early report by a CNN reporter that was at the scene was later retracted. No telling what's in Asian news. So, you might want to get off your high horse.




Wayward5oul -> RE: Another Terrorist Attack In France (8/21/2017 7:43:17 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Why is it, that when a fucking stupid fanatic runs down a group of people with a car or van, in any other country, its an act of terrorism, but when the same thing happens here, it is anything but?

Because, in VA, it was the counter protestors who attacked first, and got attacked back.

quote:


Do you have a cite for that? It is this another case of you making shit up as you go along to fit your narrative?



For days I've seen conflicting reports, anyone of which may turn out to be the case. I know at least one early report by a CNN reporter that was at the scene was later retracted. No telling what's in Asian news. So, you might want to get off your high horse.

No, I don't need to get off my high horse. If she is going to make a matter of fact statement like that, then she should be able to defend it. I have every reason to believe that she can't, as she is usually well-misinformed.

As you yourself said, conflicting reports abound, and I've seen nothing that can credibly show who was first to turn violent.




BoscoX -> RE: Another Terrorist Attack In France (8/21/2017 7:58:50 PM)


Antifa is dedicated to violence - from far left CNN:

Unmasking the leftist Antifa movement: Activists seek peace through violence

Anti-fascists and the black bloc tactic originated in Nazi Germany and resurfaced in United Kingdom in the 1980s. Large numbers of Antifa activists first appeared in the United States at anti-World Trade Organization protests in 1999 in Seattle, and then more recently during the Occupy Wall Street movement.

But their profile has been rising.

Antifa demonstrators have marched in more than a half dozen protests since Election Day in Portland, Oregon, according to police.

Earlier this year, Antifa activists were among those who smashed windows and set fires during protests at the University of California, Berkeley, leading to the cancellation of far-right provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos and withdrawal of Ann Coulter as speakers.

[…]

For almost three decades, Scott Crow was part of the Antifa movement.

"I fought (against) Nazis. I've had death threats. I've had guns drawn on me. I've drawn guns on fascists. I've been in altercations. I've smoke-bombed places," he said. "I've done a myriad of things to try and stop fascism and its flow over the years."

Activists don black bloc, Crow said, as a means to an end.

"People put on the masks so that we can all become anonymous, right? And then, therefore, we are able to move more freely and do what we need to do, whether it is illegal or not," he said.

And that means avoiding police, whom many Antifa members see as an enemy, as well as skirting the scrutiny Antifa activists often get from alt-right trolls on the Internet. Black bloc, one member told us, also unites the movement.

[…]

Antifa activists often don't hesitate to destroy property, which many see as the incarnation of unfair wealth distribution.

"Violence against windows -- there's no such thing as violence against windows," a masked Antifa member in Union Square told CNN. "Windows don't have -- they're not persons. And even when they are persons, the people we fight back against, they are evil. They are the living embodiment, they are the second coming of Hitler."

Crow explained the ideology this way: "Don't confuse legality and morality. Laws are made of governments, not of men," echoing the words of John Adams.

"Each of us breaks the law every day. It's just that we make the conscious choice to do that," he said.

Antifa members also sometimes launch attacks against people who aren't physically attacking them. The movement, Crow said, sees alt-right hate speech as violent, and for that, its activists have opted to meet violence with violence.

Right or wrong, "that's for history to decide," he said.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/08/18/us/unmasking-antifa-anti-fascists-hard-left/index.html




BamaD -> RE: Another Terrorist Attack In France (8/21/2017 8:00:38 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Why is it, that when a fucking stupid fanatic runs down a group of people with a car or van, in any other country, its an act of terrorism, but when the same thing happens here, it is anything but?

Because, in VA, it was the counter protestors who attacked first, and got attacked back.

quote:


Do you have a cite for that? It is this another case of you making shit up as you go along to fit your narrative?



For days I've seen conflicting reports, anyone of which may turn out to be the case. I know at least one early report by a CNN reporter that was at the scene was later retracted. No telling what's in Asian news. So, you might want to get off your high horse.

No, I don't need to get off my high horse. If she is going to make a matter of fact statement like that, then she should be able to defend it. I have every reason to believe that she can't, as she is usually well-misinformed.

As you yourself said, conflicting reports abound, and I've seen nothing that can credibly show who was first to turn violent.

That was my point, till we find the details we don't know if it is murder, vehicular manslaughter, of terrorism.




Greta75 -> RE: Another Terrorist Attack In France (8/21/2017 8:36:10 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul
Do you have a cite for that? It is this another case of you making shit up as you go along to fit your narrative?

I don't need a cite for this. Many have posted videos evidence here already. And it's ALL over Youtube! Just go watch multiple videos posted by live witnesses. I can form my conclusion from the footages what the real situation is. Can't listen to the left media twisting the whole account of the incident, giving a hall pass to their fellow lefties for starting the violence first.

Nazis just wanted to march down this road, got proper licensing to do so. And counterprotestors show up with pepper spray, crowbars and throwing rocks at them to agitate them and incite violence.

Peaceful counter protest is with place cards. Those counter protestors were all armed to cause damage.

I consider a peaceful protest by the people who actually DOES NOT USE THEIR WEAPONS they brought with them. The Nazi and White Supremacists did not use their guns AGAINST the Counter Protesters despite being attacked.

That IS the evidence. This is no terrorist attack.

People can't seem to tell the difference between what is a terrorist attack.

Terrorist attack is when a car mow down innocent people who didn't incite violence FIRST.

Like all the incidents in Europe. Innocent bystanders, minding their own business.

In this protest, it's totally like the gathering of two gangs getting into a fight. Not a terrorist attack.

When Nazi and White Supremacists are randomly going into different towns of USA and using their cars to mow down innocent people. Then call that a terrorist attack. THAT would be a proper terrorist attack. You know why they aren't doing it? They don't get a heavenly reward from Christianity to be doing that.

Muslims are doing it, because they believe they will get rewarded for it. And I was just thinking about the attack in Spain. 17 fucking year old is the absolute youngest caught.

It's terrible, that religion! They brainwash kids into thinking they are gonna get rewarded in heaven for killing.

PS: IF the Nazi and White Supremacists were truly planning a terrorist attack, considering how fully weaponised they all were. You'd think they would use such a useless thing like a car to cause damage? And only managed to kill one? They should be spraying bullets. Not using cars.

To even call this a terrorist attack is a joke. It's the worst planned terrorist attack ever then. IF their goal was to kill alot of non-white people. With all that guns, it's so much easier.

It's just logical conclusion that they were not planning a terrorist attack. The dude panic and hit his acceleration pedal when he was being attacked. Or the dude lost his temper at the moment and hit the acceleration pedal.

To me terrorist attacks are planned carefully for success, to hurt as many as possible. This was an act of retaliation or accident. Either one. Cause by incitement from the counter protestors. Not a planned terrorist attack.




jlf1961 -> RE: Another Terrorist Attack In France (8/21/2017 9:53:40 PM)

Greta, I really hate to burst your delusions of knowing everything, but all the fucking evidence is that no one knows which side started throwing shit.

And the fuckhead that drove the car into the crowd started from a point out side the area where the protesters were, and in that particular group, no one was doing shit except carrying fucking signs.

The witnesses said that.
The cops that saw the incident said that.
Every fucking piece of video shows that people were actually walking in a the same direction the car was headed when he ran into the crowd and two other vehicles, they did not attack the car until AFTER he had struck the crowd.

Jeez, you are either blind, on some really good drugs, or just plain fucking stupid.

Christ you make an amoeba look like Einstein with the majority of your posts.

The mother fucker waited till the fucking street was packed and the people had no place to go before he accelerated toward them you brainless bitch.




Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0859375