Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: how to keep my slave from coming to the website


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> RE: how to keep my slave from coming to the website Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: how to keep my slave from coming to the website - 8/26/2017 7:26:23 PM   
UllrsIshtar


Posts: 3693
Joined: 7/28/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar
BTW LP, as a military spouse, I'm really surprised that you're putting the responsibility for effective leadership on the subordinates, and not on the person carrying the command.


Damn right I do!

Do you really think I need MP to tell me what my responsibilities are? In case you missed it.., I was rather self--sufficient long before MP ever came along. Why would I need a so-called "leader"?

I'm responsible for me, toots. Who do you think takes care of this sh^t while the spouse is deployed?




That's not what I said... You are so massively missing the point that I don't even know where to start.

I didn't say anything about MP being responsible for you.

What I said is that I'm surprised that you think that the responsibility for commands being obeyed falls on the subordinate, consider that the military places such responsibility on the officer who is issuing the orders...
According to military structures, the responsibility for ensure orders are carried out is on the person in command... not on the person receiving the commands.

BTW, I'd still be interested in hearing how it is you think that I disregard other people.




_____________________________

I can be your whore
I am the dirt you created
I am your sinner
And your whore
But let me tell you something baby
You love me for everything you hate me for

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: how to keep my slave from coming to the website - 8/26/2017 8:06:47 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
That's how responsibility works. One must to *themselves* about such matters.





_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to UllrsIshtar)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: how to keep my slave from coming to the website - 8/26/2017 9:43:07 PM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

No doll, it is just one of those stupid "you define a slave differently than I do" arguments, and experience has taught me that there is no point in engaging in those, as they never get resolved and are utterly meaningless. If you want to call yourself a slave without having to obey the person you call Master or Mistress, then power to you, just don't expect me to call you a slave.
I've written before about how Wittgenstein's maxim that the meaning of words is defined by their use within a community is an effective starting point for understanding the sheer futility of these discussions. Because ultimately the lack of consensus within even the kink community results in a fragmentation of meaning for even such simple concepts as 'Master' and 'slave'.

Followed to its logical conclusion, the meaning of the word 'slave' is effectively defined by the two participants in the dynamic which claims to employ it. Consequently semantic debates about the word 'slave' are fucking stupid.

And let's face it - it's nothing more than a vague excuse for most of you to indulge your malice toward each other.

Not that I'm claiming to be any better - but frankly, I find my more direct approach to hostilities to be somewhat more honest.

_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: how to keep my slave from coming to the website - 8/26/2017 10:33:51 PM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline
quote:

Consequently semantic debates about the word 'slave' are fucking stupid.

Yup, and yet, as you can see, some people insist on engaging in them. What can you do? People are strange like that.

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: how to keep my slave from coming to the website - 8/27/2017 2:52:22 AM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar
What I said is that I'm surprised that you think that the responsibility for commands being obeyed falls on the subordinate, consider that the military places such responsibility on the officer who is issuing the orders...
According to military structures, the responsibility for ensure orders are carried out is on the person in command... not on the person receiving the commands.

The problem with this is that you picked a really poor example. Literally, you picked a classification of people who sign their name on a contract that says they will do what they told. (Trust me, I'm not sitting here telling you that's what people actually do all of the time, even though it's what they agreed to do.) Failure to obey tends to be a pretty big deal. In most cases, it's not going to cost anybody a command, as long as the expectations have been set.




_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to UllrsIshtar)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: how to keep my slave from coming to the website - 8/27/2017 3:58:34 AM   
UllrsIshtar


Posts: 3693
Joined: 7/28/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

Because ultimately the lack of consensus within even the kink community results in a fragmentation of meaning for even such simple concepts as 'Master' and 'slave'.


Consensuses don't get reached without debate.

_____________________________

I can be your whore
I am the dirt you created
I am your sinner
And your whore
But let me tell you something baby
You love me for everything you hate me for

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: how to keep my slave from coming to the website - 8/27/2017 4:00:28 AM   
UllrsIshtar


Posts: 3693
Joined: 7/28/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

Consequently semantic debates about the word 'slave' are fucking stupid.

Yup, and yet, as you can see, some people insist on engaging in them. What can you do? People are strange like that.


If you feel that way, I'd suggest you shouldn't start those kinds of debates by broadly declaring which concepts do or do not fall under the definition of consensual slavery.

_____________________________

I can be your whore
I am the dirt you created
I am your sinner
And your whore
But let me tell you something baby
You love me for everything you hate me for

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: how to keep my slave from coming to the website - 8/27/2017 5:34:41 AM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

Consequently semantic debates about the word 'slave' are fucking stupid.

Yup, and yet, as you can see, some people insist on engaging in them. What can you do? People are strange like that.


If you feel that way, I'd suggest you shouldn't start those kinds of debates by broadly declaring which concepts do or do not fall under the definition of consensual slavery.

I didn't, so once again, just fuck off with your bullshit lies.

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to UllrsIshtar)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: how to keep my slave from coming to the website - 8/27/2017 5:39:57 AM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

Because ultimately the lack of consensus within even the kink community results in a fragmentation of meaning for even such simple concepts as 'Master' and 'slave'.


Consensuses don't get reached without debate.
In certain aspects of human affairs, yes. In regard to the evolution of language - no. Much as I decry the degradation of language, there's no doubt that corruptions such as "Wanna come with?" are increasingly employed because they offer a certain context-based utility.

Similarly, I don't speak French, but I gather that - when spoken - French makes almost no distinction between singular and plural because it's implied by context. That's a utilitarian adaption more than anything else.

In other words, language evolves from the bottom up, not from the top down. Central authorities might record the language consensus but they rarely decide it.


_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to UllrsIshtar)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: how to keep my slave from coming to the website - 8/27/2017 6:03:57 AM   
UllrsIshtar


Posts: 3693
Joined: 7/28/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness


quote:

ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

Because ultimately the lack of consensus within even the kink community results in a fragmentation of meaning for even such simple concepts as 'Master' and 'slave'.


Consensuses don't get reached without debate.
In certain aspects of human affairs, yes. In regard to the evolution of language - no. Much as I decry the degradation of language, there's no doubt that corruptions such as "Wanna come with?" are increasingly employed because they offer a certain context-based utility.

Similarly, I don't speak French, but I gather that - when spoken - French makes almost no distinction between singular and plural because it's implied by context. That's a utilitarian adaption more than anything else.

In other words, language evolves from the bottom up, not from the top down. Central authorities might record the language consensus but they rarely decide it.



This isn't a language debate though. Definitions don't matter, because I've granted the any other party's right to call contractual obedience 'slavery' several time. Likewise I've tried on a myriad of occasions to term an authority dynamic in which obedience isn't contractual as valid, without casting it as 'slavery'.
Attempts to do so are met with hostility and denial, not of the terms used, but of the validity of the existence of such a structure under the BDSM umbrella.
The validity of the structure is what's up for debate, the terms used are, as you point out, irrelevant.

_____________________________

I can be your whore
I am the dirt you created
I am your sinner
And your whore
But let me tell you something baby
You love me for everything you hate me for

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: how to keep my slave from coming to the website - 8/27/2017 6:06:00 AM   
UllrsIshtar


Posts: 3693
Joined: 7/28/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick


quote:

ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

Consequently semantic debates about the word 'slave' are fucking stupid.

Yup, and yet, as you can see, some people insist on engaging in them. What can you do? People are strange like that.


If you feel that way, I'd suggest you shouldn't start those kinds of debates by broadly declaring which concepts do or do not fall under the definition of consensual slavery.

I didn't, so once again, just fuck off with your bullshit lies.


*shrugs*

I don't need to quote your own posts back to you.

Again, I'm sorry that you're having such a rough time, or that this has struck such a cord, but your irrational hostility belies your point.

_____________________________

I can be your whore
I am the dirt you created
I am your sinner
And your whore
But let me tell you something baby
You love me for everything you hate me for

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: how to keep my slave from coming to the website - 8/27/2017 7:23:10 AM   
kiwisub22


Posts: 450
Joined: 7/16/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar


quote:

ORIGINAL: kiwisub22

where I and my dominant crafted our relationship - to include my obedience - even when he wasn't watching.



Exactly, you have crafted your relationship to include your obedience as an expectation.
Which means that if you fail to obey, you've violated the terms of your relationship.

The same way that if you promise to have a monogamous relationship, and you then fuck another person, you've failed to uphold your promises in the relationship.

However, do you not understand that there's other ways to set up relationships than yours?
If you agree to be poly, and you fuck somebody else within the terms of your poly relationship, you have not violated the terms of your relationship.

Just like if you don't swear obedience, and you then disobey, you've not violated the terms of your relationship.


quote:

ORIGINAL: kiwisub22
For that matter, how is that any integrity?


How does integrity come into play, if no promises are broken, no agreements violated, and the terms of the relationship are upheld?




Where to you get that I don't understand that there are other ways to set up a relationship? In fact, I rather carefully worded my post to show that what my dom and I did was for US - not the rest of the world. No-one I know had a relationship like ours - there may have been similar ones, but not just like ours, because , obviously, we were individuals and putting together our relationship agreements meant that we incorporated our own wants and needs. Ishtar, I think you are arguing the validity of your relationship with the wrong people. The only ones that understand it are the ones in it. Everyone else gets a view that is essentially skewed because they can't get a true view.

In MY view, the OP doesn't have a Master/slave relationship because he can't trust his "slave" to obey his orders. In his view, he has a disobedient slave that needs to obey. Very different ideas of the same wordage. Our idea of the definition of the word "slave" are obviously not the same. And probably won't ever get closer together.

(in reply to UllrsIshtar)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: how to keep my slave from coming to the website - 8/27/2017 7:32:19 AM   
JstAnotherSub


Posts: 6174
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kiwisub22


quote:

ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar


quote:

ORIGINAL: kiwisub22

where I and my dominant crafted our relationship - to include my obedience - even when he wasn't watching.



Exactly, you have crafted your relationship to include your obedience as an expectation.
Which means that if you fail to obey, you've violated the terms of your relationship.

The same way that if you promise to have a monogamous relationship, and you then fuck another person, you've failed to uphold your promises in the relationship.

However, do you not understand that there's other ways to set up relationships than yours?
If you agree to be poly, and you fuck somebody else within the terms of your poly relationship, you have not violated the terms of your relationship.

Just like if you don't swear obedience, and you then disobey, you've not violated the terms of your relationship.


quote:

ORIGINAL: kiwisub22
For that matter, how is that any integrity?


How does integrity come into play, if no promises are broken, no agreements violated, and the terms of the relationship are upheld?




Where to you get that I don't understand that there are other ways to set up a relationship? In fact, I rather carefully worded my post to show that what my dom and I did was for US - not the rest of the world. No-one I know had a relationship like ours - there may have been similar ones, but not just like ours, because , obviously, we were individuals and putting together our relationship agreements meant that we incorporated our own wants and needs. Ishtar, I think you are arguing the validity of your relationship with the wrong people. The only ones that understand it are the ones in it. Everyone else gets a view that is essentially skewed because they can't get a true view.

In MY view, the OP doesn't have a Master/slave relationship because he can't trust his "slave" to obey his orders. In his view, he has a disobedient slave that needs to obey. Very different ideas of the same wordage. Our idea of the definition of the word "slave" are obviously not the same. And probably won't ever get closer together.


The bolded finally made my brain go click. I commented on this thread before I read it and I have come back several times trying to figure out what was going on.

Whether you meant to or not, that bolded comment made me realize that it seems Ishtar, in her frenzy to convince us that her relationship is legit, made me wonder if she even believes it herself.

And I am not even saying this to be contrary or to doubt the authenticity of her relationship. Just that in my experience, when someone argues this much to prove their point, they doubt it themselves. In my experience, people who are sure of their convictions will state them once, maybe twice, then walk away secure in their own perceptions being correct.

Let me repeat that this is from my view on life, how *I* interpret it, and what I have been unable to put my finger on until reading kiwisub's reply.

_____________________________

yep

(in reply to kiwisub22)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: how to keep my slave from coming to the website - 8/27/2017 7:58:56 AM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline
OK, you are clearly insane.

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to UllrsIshtar)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: how to keep my slave from coming to the website - 8/27/2017 8:11:41 AM   
Wayward5oul


Posts: 3314
Joined: 11/9/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JstAnotherSub


quote:

ORIGINAL: kiwisub22


quote:

ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar


quote:

ORIGINAL: kiwisub22

where I and my dominant crafted our relationship - to include my obedience - even when he wasn't watching.



Exactly, you have crafted your relationship to include your obedience as an expectation.
Which means that if you fail to obey, you've violated the terms of your relationship.

The same way that if you promise to have a monogamous relationship, and you then fuck another person, you've failed to uphold your promises in the relationship.

However, do you not understand that there's other ways to set up relationships than yours?
If you agree to be poly, and you fuck somebody else within the terms of your poly relationship, you have not violated the terms of your relationship.

Just like if you don't swear obedience, and you then disobey, you've not violated the terms of your relationship.


quote:

ORIGINAL: kiwisub22
For that matter, how is that any integrity?


How does integrity come into play, if no promises are broken, no agreements violated, and the terms of the relationship are upheld?




Where to you get that I don't understand that there are other ways to set up a relationship? In fact, I rather carefully worded my post to show that what my dom and I did was for US - not the rest of the world. No-one I know had a relationship like ours - there may have been similar ones, but not just like ours, because , obviously, we were individuals and putting together our relationship agreements meant that we incorporated our own wants and needs. Ishtar, I think you are arguing the validity of your relationship with the wrong people. The only ones that understand it are the ones in it. Everyone else gets a view that is essentially skewed because they can't get a true view.

In MY view, the OP doesn't have a Master/slave relationship because he can't trust his "slave" to obey his orders. In his view, he has a disobedient slave that needs to obey. Very different ideas of the same wordage. Our idea of the definition of the word "slave" are obviously not the same. And probably won't ever get closer together.


The bolded finally made my brain go click. I commented on this thread before I read it and I have come back several times trying to figure out what was going on.

Whether you meant to or not, that bolded comment made me realize that it seems Ishtar, in her frenzy to convince us that her relationship is legit, made me wonder if she even believes it herself.

And I am not even saying this to be contrary or to doubt the authenticity of her relationship. Just that in my experience, when someone argues this much to prove their point, they doubt it themselves. In my experience, people who are sure of their convictions will state them once, maybe twice, then walk away secure in their own perceptions being correct.

Let me repeat that this is from my view on life, how *I* interpret it, and what I have been unable to put my finger on until reading kiwisub's reply.

I have to disagree on this.

I don't have a dog in this fight, as I have never been in any type of relationship that is described here, but two things strike me about this conversation.

First, and relevant to the above post, Ishtar often treats discussions on this manner,, whether it is something that applies to her own life or not. Once she invests in a topic, she routinely writes lengthy and numerous posts explaining her thought process and tries to address each poster and their points. I don't see these responses as trying to convince herself of her authenticity. I see it as par for the course in terms of her usual posting style.

Secondly, I see a lot of "one twue wayism" regarding what a slave is, and no recognition that throughout history, many slaves were designated as such simply because they were property, which is what Ishtar has referred to herself as. As property, they were expected to behave in certain manners and when they didn't, they were punished,. But they weren't any less a slave. Slavery existed before bdsm practitioners started trying to define wiitwd.

(in reply to JstAnotherSub)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: how to keep my slave from coming to the website - 8/27/2017 9:41:43 AM   
JstAnotherSub


Posts: 6174
Status: offline
I cannot argue with anything you have said, because we are both stating our perspective. I will agree 100% that it is her posting style, and I have read many of her posts and found wisdom. This one just comes off to me as trying too hard to make everyone believe what she is saying.

_____________________________

yep

(in reply to Wayward5oul)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: how to keep my slave from coming to the website - 8/27/2017 10:03:47 AM   
UllrsIshtar


Posts: 3693
Joined: 7/28/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JstAnotherSub

Whether you meant to or not, that bolded comment made me realize that it seems Ishtar, in her frenzy to convince us that her relationship is legit, made me wonder if she even believes it herself.





Yeah, see what Wayward5oul said. It's just my posting style. I'm not frenzied about this topic.

This is just one of the topics of interest to me on which I enjoy debating, and do so any time the topic comes up. There's others, including ones I don't need to argue any more, because my position on it 10 years ago is now 'common view', at the very least around these parts.

I could argue the other side of this debate with as much zeal as I do mine, it's just that there's no need for that, considering that there's dozens of people already taking that stance.

_____________________________

I can be your whore
I am the dirt you created
I am your sinner
And your whore
But let me tell you something baby
You love me for everything you hate me for

(in reply to JstAnotherSub)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: how to keep my slave from coming to the website - 8/27/2017 10:25:42 AM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline
This whole discussion is actually irrelevant to Ishtar because Ishtar is not a slave and she has no Master. So her relationship is not defined as slavery so why are we even discussing it here?

(in reply to UllrsIshtar)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: how to keep my slave from coming to the website - 8/27/2017 10:41:59 AM   
UllrsIshtar


Posts: 3693
Joined: 7/28/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kiwisub22

Where to you get that I don't understand that there are other ways to set up a relationship?'



I got if from the fact that you claimed to not understand it:


kiwisub22: I don't understand the idea that a "slave" will only obey her "master" when she feels like it, or can get away with not doing it. How is that a slave? For that matter, how is that any integrity?


Not only did you claim to not understand it, you actually questioned if it was possible to have integrity in such a relationship construct.



quote:

ORIGINAL: kiwisub22

In fact, I rather carefully worded my post to show that what my dom and I did was for US - not the rest of the world.



In your carefully worded post, you declared that if a relationship isn't set up as yours, they aren't entitled to use the same labels as you chose to use for your relationship:

kiwisub22: If the slave is not obeying the master, then she isn't really a slave, and he isn't really a master. What they have, I think, is a vanilla relationship with kinky sex, or kinky overtones.

You declared that relationships where the slave isn't obeying the Master, are vanilla, with some kinky sex thrown in. That wasn't a "this is what I'd label my own relationship if it fell under these parameters" that was a "people who have relationships like that are vanilla with some kinky sex".


quote:

ORIGINAL: kiwisub22

Ishtar, I think you are arguing the validity of your relationship with the wrong people. The only ones that understand it are the ones in it. Everyone else gets a view that is essentially skewed because they can't get a true view.



*shrug*

We argue the validity of concepts around these parts all the time, and have no problem explaining them to people who aren't in them themselves. Daddy/little girls, transsexuality, homosexuality, latex fetishes... etc, etc, these are all concepts which are validated within the kink community even by people who aren't 'in it'. I don't see why this kinda thing would be different.


quote:

ORIGINAL: kiwisub22

In MY view, the OP doesn't have a Master/slave relationship because he can't trust his "slave" to obey his orders. In his view, he has a disobedient slave that needs to obey. Very different ideas of the same wordage. Our idea of the definition of the word "slave" are obviously not the same. And probably won't ever get closer together.



But now we're getting down to it, aren't we?

You -among several others here- are arguing that in order to be a slave, one needs to have a agreed upon obligation to obey. If that obligation is broken, then one has broken one's role in the relationship, and is now no longer entitled to claim the title that came with it.
I can understand that concept, I have validated it. I'm not arguing with it.

Yet, what I'm arguing is that this is a total departure of what the term 'slave' historically meant. Historically speaking, slaves could not be trusted to obey. They were under no agreement to obey. They needed to be under threat of -often violent- punishment in order to get them to comply. Any slave owner would assume a slave who was not check up on regularly would disobey. In fact, dishonesty when it comes to following commands was what was expected of them.
99% of the world still sees slaves that way. That's what they picture when they imagine a slave.

And yet... you're arguing that if one sets up a BDSM relationship to emulate such a dynamic consensually, that this is specifically NOT slavery.

A relationship such as yours, with is the opposite of the origin of the term is acceptable to get the Master/slave label, while a relationship which emulates the origin of the term much closer is deemed to be not Master/slave but vanilla with some kinky sex.

Yet, nobody is willing to step up and explain why that is. Why is it that you consider relationships in which the s-type behaves as a historical slave would have 'vanilla-ish'?
It's that, which I don't understand.

I'm fine with you claiming that you have no desire to be in such a relationship -very few people would want to be- but to unequivocally declare that such relationships are vanilla-ish makes no sense to me.

I'd like to have it explained to me -by anybody willing to try, not just kiwi- why precisely it is that an ownership dynamic which is based on force, and which is thus akin to how a dog is owned, or akin to how a historical slave was owned, or akin to how modern day illegal slaves are owned (slavery is technically illegal everywhere, and these slaves often physically can leave, but do not for a myriad of reasons), is somehow not slavery/vanilla with kinky sex thrown in.

_____________________________

I can be your whore
I am the dirt you created
I am your sinner
And your whore
But let me tell you something baby
You love me for everything you hate me for

(in reply to kiwisub22)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: how to keep my slave from coming to the website - 8/27/2017 11:49:40 AM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
No argument about the posting style. I don't know if Ishtar would agree with me on it or not, but there's also the view that there just aren't as many good threads that people can sink their teeth into that give people the opportunity to discuss their views on kinks, how their dynamics work, thoughts on areas such as authority and/or obedience. Kind of ironic that we managed to pull that out from a single sentence original post, but hey, it's turned out interesting.

What I'll disagree with is that there is an undercurrent of 'one true wayism' going on. Telling somebody that their type of dynamic wouldn't work for me isn't the same thing as telling *them* they are doing it wrong. To me, some of it sounds like too much work. I tend to prefer things like harmony and obedience.

As I see it, my JOB in any power imbalance dynamic, is to be the authority. I'm not the ultimate authority. Pretty much, I exercise the authority I've been given. Should a person chose to no longer live under said authority, guess what? I don't have it, anymore.

While I appreciate reading other people's views when they compare CONSENSUAL slavery to historical slavery, I can't get on board with that. It comes down to "can you leave?" Not whether you *think* you can leave or not.


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to UllrsIshtar)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> RE: how to keep my slave from coming to the website Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.177