Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: The original arguments FOR the second amendment


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The original arguments FOR the second amendment Page: <<   < prev  25 26 27 [28] 29   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The original arguments FOR the second amendment - 10/21/2017 10:23:24 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
FR

in·fringe

actively break the terms of (a law, agreement, etc.).
"making an unauthorized copy would infringe copyright"
synonyms: contravene, violate, transgress, break, breach; More
disobey, defy, flout, fly in the face of;
disregard, ignore, neglect;
go beyond, overstep, exceed; infract

"the statute infringed constitutionally guaranteed rights"
antonyms: obey, comply with

act so as to limit or undermine (something); encroach on.

and its all unconstitutional.


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to MercTech)
Profile   Post #: 541
RE: The original arguments FOR the second amendment - 10/21/2017 10:55:54 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


When each gun law is passed the proponents who had hailed as "the fix"
start calling it a beginning. Have you ever considered a beginning for what?
You also don't understand what "the militia" meant when I stop a person from
messing around my neighbors house I am filling their definition of the militia.
When people stopped a rape and held the attacker for the police that was
the militia. Now you tell me that because my right leg won't let me march I no longer
have the right to own a firearm and by extension my right to self defense is
out the window.



Gee, I am on disability for a serious back problem and I am a member of the state militia.

However, due to the fact I have a HAM license they are not concerned so much with my ability to march as my ability to maintain effective communications.

Bama, you are trying to argue a point that, in actuality makes little sense.

Technically, every time you buy a firearm it IS registered, the only thing is that the retailer keeps the forms instead of sending them to some government agency.

If any agency wanted to confiscate weapons in the hands of civilians, all they have to do is go to all the retailers and pick up those forms.

You acknowledge the fact that the laws in place prevent confiscation, you even acknowledged the supreme court has ruled every case where a citizen's guns were confiscated has been in the favor of gun owners.

But you are really pushing the what if argument when it comes to registration.

But you also pointed out that they could start by banning guns with magazine capacity of over 7 rounds, and then use the registration forms to come and get them.

The forms kept by the retailers is all they need now if they do something like that.

What is to stop them?

The point I am trying very hard to make is the hard line on both sides is gonna end up biting us all in the ass.

And every time there is some incident like Vegas or Sandy Hook or Columbine or some other mass shooting the gun law lobby gains ground. And the hard line stance is giving it to them.

Yes, you defending your neighbor's property is very much in the line of the unorganized militia. The business owners in the LA riots were doing the same damn thing, and the courts recognized it as such.

As it stands now, the only legal, constitutional confiscation of guns is those belonging to people that are no longer legally allowed to have them. Yes, some fucking dick headed politicians tried to over step it, and people got fucked in the process, but, if we as gun owners dont stand up and do something to take the fucking bite out of some of the anti gun or more gun law arguments, we will eventually get fucked over with no recourse.

Christ I got a piece of property that is 250 acres, and a few 'well meaning neighbors' call the law every time I go over and shoot. The local sheriff deputies are tired of having to come by, the local dispatcher is tired of the bullshit calls, and I am not all that happy to see four squad cars pull up next to my barn.

The range I work part time at is constantly getting noise complaints filed against them, which means the owner has to go down to some hearing, he knows he is going to win the case, but it does not stop the bullshit.

Right now, if it was up to me, I buy every gun law proponent a one way ticket to whatever gun free country they want.

I am sick of hearing the 'second amendment was never meant for modern firearms' when in the same breath the preach how the bill of rights applies to the internet, cell phones, computers and every other modern technology that the founding fathers and framers of the constitution could never have dreamed of.

What is worse, is the gun laws we have now, were the products of some give and take, and gun owners won. We need to get back to that, or eventually we will lose.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 542
RE: The original arguments FOR the second amendment - 10/22/2017 12:29:31 AM   
heavyblinker


Posts: 3623
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

How is the federal government going to seize over 270 million guns?
Especially from people who would rather kill/die than give them up?

I would really like to know how anyone can think that the situation isn't utterly hopeless.


It is simple.
They won't grab the 200 million guns at once.
First they will outlaw any gun that holds over 7 rounds and confiscate them.
They will tell us this isn't confiscation because we still have guns.
Then they will outlaw any long guns that holds more than 4 because you can't
use them for hunting. And it still won't be confiscation because will still have guns.
Then they will outlaw ......


Oh FFS that is just a hopelessly paranoid delusion.

If you were currently allowed to own a military-grade drone armed with nuclear weapons, the moment someone suggested it was dangerous you would be ranting about the second amendment and crying fascism, and the GOP and the NRA would be backing you up and feeding you all of the delusions and lies you need to make sure your outrage was impossible to counteract in any way.


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 543
RE: The original arguments FOR the second amendment - 10/22/2017 7:33:49 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


When each gun law is passed the proponents who had hailed as "the fix"
start calling it a beginning. Have you ever considered a beginning for what?
You also don't understand what "the militia" meant when I stop a person from
messing around my neighbors house I am filling their definition of the militia.
When people stopped a rape and held the attacker for the police that was
the militia. Now you tell me that because my right leg won't let me march I no longer
have the right to own a firearm and by extension my right to self defense is
out the window.



Gee, I am on disability for a serious back problem and I am a member of the state militia.

However, due to the fact I have a HAM license they are not concerned so much with my ability to march as my ability to maintain effective communications.

Bama, you are trying to argue a point that, in actuality makes little sense.

Technically, every time you buy a firearm it IS registered, the only thing is that the retailer keeps the forms instead of sending them to some government agency.

If any agency wanted to confiscate weapons in the hands of civilians, all they have to do is go to all the retailers and pick up those forms.

You acknowledge the fact that the laws in place prevent confiscation, you even acknowledged the supreme court has ruled every case where a citizen's guns were confiscated has been in the favor of gun owners.

But you are really pushing the what if argument when it comes to registration.

But you also pointed out that they could start by banning guns with magazine capacity of over 7 rounds, and then use the registration forms to come and get them.

The forms kept by the retailers is all they need now if they do something like that.

What is to stop them?

The point I am trying very hard to make is the hard line on both sides is gonna end up biting us all in the ass.

And every time there is some incident like Vegas or Sandy Hook or Columbine or some other mass shooting the gun law lobby gains ground. And the hard line stance is giving it to them.

Yes, you defending your neighbor's property is very much in the line of the unorganized militia. The business owners in the LA riots were doing the same damn thing, and the courts recognized it as such.

As it stands now, the only legal, constitutional confiscation of guns is those belonging to people that are no longer legally allowed to have them. Yes, some fucking dick headed politicians tried to over step it, and people got fucked in the process, but, if we as gun owners dont stand up and do something to take the fucking bite out of some of the anti gun or more gun law arguments, we will eventually get fucked over with no recourse.

Christ I got a piece of property that is 250 acres, and a few 'well meaning neighbors' call the law every time I go over and shoot. The local sheriff deputies are tired of having to come by, the local dispatcher is tired of the bullshit calls, and I am not all that happy to see four squad cars pull up next to my barn.

The range I work part time at is constantly getting noise complaints filed against them, which means the owner has to go down to some hearing, he knows he is going to win the case, but it does not stop the bullshit.

Right now, if it was up to me, I buy every gun law proponent a one way ticket to whatever gun free country they want.

I am sick of hearing the 'second amendment was never meant for modern firearms' when in the same breath the preach how the bill of rights applies to the internet, cell phones, computers and every other modern technology that the founding fathers and framers of the constitution could never have dreamed of.

What is worse, is the gun laws we have now, were the products of some give and take, and gun owners won. We need to get back to that, or eventually we will lose.

So you want to give up and make it easy for them. Apparently thinking they are well meaning.
As it stands now it would take a lot of time and effort to get the information
and give some chance of a non violent fight. With your way they have the information at their fingertips
and it is over before it begins. You are also wrong in your apparent belief
about the 2nd. It is a right of the people, not a privilege of militia members.
You DO NOT HAVE TO BE IN THE MILITIA TO HAVE THE RIGHT.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 544
RE: The original arguments FOR the second amendment - 10/22/2017 11:36:22 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


When each gun law is passed the proponents who had hailed as "the fix"
start calling it a beginning. Have you ever considered a beginning for what?
You also don't understand what "the militia" meant when I stop a person from
messing around my neighbors house I am filling their definition of the militia.
When people stopped a rape and held the attacker for the police that was
the militia. Now you tell me that because my right leg won't let me march I no longer
have the right to own a firearm and by extension my right to self defense is
out the window.



Gee, I am on disability for a serious back problem and I am a member of the state militia.

However, due to the fact I have a HAM license they are not concerned so much with my ability to march as my ability to maintain effective communications.

Bama, you are trying to argue a point that, in actuality makes little sense.

Technically, every time you buy a firearm it IS registered, the only thing is that the retailer keeps the forms instead of sending them to some government agency.

If any agency wanted to confiscate weapons in the hands of civilians, all they have to do is go to all the retailers and pick up those forms.

You acknowledge the fact that the laws in place prevent confiscation, you even acknowledged the supreme court has ruled every case where a citizen's guns were confiscated has been in the favor of gun owners.

But you are really pushing the what if argument when it comes to registration.

But you also pointed out that they could start by banning guns with magazine capacity of over 7 rounds, and then use the registration forms to come and get them.

The forms kept by the retailers is all they need now if they do something like that.

What is to stop them?

The point I am trying very hard to make is the hard line on both sides is gonna end up biting us all in the ass.

And every time there is some incident like Vegas or Sandy Hook or Columbine or some other mass shooting the gun law lobby gains ground. And the hard line stance is giving it to them.

Yes, you defending your neighbor's property is very much in the line of the unorganized militia. The business owners in the LA riots were doing the same damn thing, and the courts recognized it as such.

As it stands now, the only legal, constitutional confiscation of guns is those belonging to people that are no longer legally allowed to have them. Yes, some fucking dick headed politicians tried to over step it, and people got fucked in the process, but, if we as gun owners dont stand up and do something to take the fucking bite out of some of the anti gun or more gun law arguments, we will eventually get fucked over with no recourse.

Christ I got a piece of property that is 250 acres, and a few 'well meaning neighbors' call the law every time I go over and shoot. The local sheriff deputies are tired of having to come by, the local dispatcher is tired of the bullshit calls, and I am not all that happy to see four squad cars pull up next to my barn.

The range I work part time at is constantly getting noise complaints filed against them, which means the owner has to go down to some hearing, he knows he is going to win the case, but it does not stop the bullshit.

Right now, if it was up to me, I buy every gun law proponent a one way ticket to whatever gun free country they want.

I am sick of hearing the 'second amendment was never meant for modern firearms' when in the same breath the preach how the bill of rights applies to the internet, cell phones, computers and every other modern technology that the founding fathers and framers of the constitution could never have dreamed of.

What is worse, is the gun laws we have now, were the products of some give and take, and gun owners won. We need to get back to that, or eventually we will lose.

Something else you have forgotten. Those forms tell who originally bought them. Your registration
tells who has them legally. Till they find an excuse to outlaw them,

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 545
RE: The original arguments FOR the second amendment - 10/22/2017 1:04:36 PM   
masterfulmar


Posts: 16
Joined: 10/7/2006
Status: offline
And Nuclear powered bath toys they jam up their pipe holes before they come onto the forums: cackling, boasting and bragging.

(in reply to heavyblinker)
Profile   Post #: 546
RE: The original arguments FOR the second amendment - 10/22/2017 1:36:22 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
get off the forum and get the help you need.

(in reply to masterfulmar)
Profile   Post #: 547
RE: The original arguments FOR the second amendment - 10/22/2017 1:42:11 PM   
heavyblinker


Posts: 3623
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

get off the forum and get the help you need.


I would suggest the same thing for you, but the truth is that you're too dull to be mentally ill.

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 548
RE: The original arguments FOR the second amendment - 10/22/2017 2:01:52 PM   
masterfulmar


Posts: 16
Joined: 10/7/2006
Status: offline
I have never seen you contribute save your vileness and hatred to the cost of a few good people. Do you feel proud? Big? Imprtant? Of value? Marvlous? I always wondered as I saw what you did too swearyman over the years with your sickness

Do you know he never reported you once (nor did I)? He is worth 1000 of you.
I personally find you utterly fucking disgusting and a sad pathetic lavy pan floater. You remind me of the orange unhinged one wrecking America great again.

On a more serious note I have absolutely no idea who this account is. I have no fucking clue who this persons account is. Obviously he is not as handsome as me like you dogsbreath44 but you idiots cannot have everything

My original incarnation spoke of that the last 3 years.
I wonder who they are putting on awaiting?

Oh hi Heavyblinker -I truly wonder how long you will last on here but understand you are a waste to this site and the likes of dogpanter44

Begone and find yourself a nice women.
I am relic a last echo.

You were right about the depth and depravity of the colluding Russian assassinations ;)

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 549
RE: The original arguments FOR the second amendment - 10/22/2017 3:22:28 PM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

How is the federal government going to seize over 270 million guns?
Especially from people who would rather kill/die than give them up?

I would really like to know how anyone can think that the situation isn't utterly hopeless.


It is simple.
They won't grab the 200 million guns at once.
First they will outlaw any gun that holds over 7 rounds and confiscate them.
They will tell us this isn't confiscation because we still have guns.
Then they will outlaw any long guns that holds more than 4 because you can't
use them for hunting. And it still won't be confiscation because will still have guns.
Then they will outlaw ......


Oh FFS that is just a hopelessly paranoid delusion.

If you were currently allowed to own a military-grade drone armed with nuclear weapons, the moment someone suggested it was dangerous you would be ranting about the second amendment and crying fascism, and the GOP and the NRA would be backing you up and feeding you all of the delusions and lies you need to make sure your outrage was impossible to counteract in any way.



FFS, the more I listen to you the more you sound like an elementary school girl.

(in reply to heavyblinker)
Profile   Post #: 550
RE: The original arguments FOR the second amendment - 10/22/2017 3:37:17 PM   
masterfulmar


Posts: 16
Joined: 10/7/2006
Status: offline
i vote for him blithering jobbie pants

Does your filthy muckery bode well?

They say I can take halfwit at 40 paces, you I would take at less than one and fuk into a wheelie bin whilst laughing hard, with my glorious stream and before visiting yuo wiyh brain hammers whilst depositing a moghty shit in front of you
And a fuking total hammering




(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 551
RE: The original arguments FOR the second amendment - 10/23/2017 10:41:47 AM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline


quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr from this post, dated 14 JUN, 2016


I wish I could have chosen more than one answer in this little survey. Ultimately, I chose: "I don't need a reason. It's my right." There's a bit of an explanation that needs to go, here:

I was going to chose: " ... to defend myself and others from tyranny" and that's valid, but it's so much more basic than that. A free man has the right to keep himself free. He has a right and an obligation to provide for his family. I'm not talking about hunting, here (I don't hunt). I'm talking about providing for them by keeping them safe.

There is a direct correlation between being able to express yourself, freely and being able to defend yourself, freely. A lot of people don't get that. Quite frankly, if it weren't for the use of weapons, Africans might still be slaves, in this country.

The civil war aside, let's please remember that some of the earliest gun control laws in this country were to keep arms out of slaves' hands. That's fact. Those laws were, then, changed during our horrific "Jim Crow" era. Africans were no longer slaves, but southerners were doing everything thing they could to find every nook and cranny in the federal regulations to continue life as it had been.

Why were they doing this? It's simple: Free men, with the ability to defend themselves were a danger to the southerners because those free men wouldn't have had to tolerate the bullshit that the plantation owner mentality was throwing down.

When the CRA was signed and the segregationist bullshit was finally put to grass, the KKK (and others) suddenly became a lot less ballsy in their attacks because law-abiding, FREE, African Americans suddenly had the true ability to defend themselves.

Let's bring it to today, now: I believe this government is on the very verge of tyranny. Taxation without representation is rampant. Freedom of religion is an anachronistic fantasy. Thought crimes are firmly ensconced.

So, why is there a large portion of people that are so ginned up on gun control. That's easy, too. For the most part, they are cradle-to-grave-government leeches, in that that's what they want the government to do for them. How will the government accomplish that? Well, a start is if you re-visit these words:

"Free men, with the ability to defend themselves were a danger to the southerners Federal Government because those free men wouldn't have had to tolerate the bullshit that the plantation owner We're-not-public-servants-we're-your-overlords mentality was throwing down.

This country absolutely is engaged in a civil war where totalitarian asswipes are attempting to un-do everything (good and bad) that's been done.

That's not the America for which I fought and my son died.



Michael



_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 552
RE: The original arguments FOR the second amendment - 10/23/2017 1:17:22 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


When each gun law is passed the proponents who had hailed as "the fix"
start calling it a beginning. Have you ever considered a beginning for what?
You also don't understand what "the militia" meant when I stop a person from
messing around my neighbors house I am filling their definition of the militia.
When people stopped a rape and held the attacker for the police that was
the militia. Now you tell me that because my right leg won't let me march I no longer
have the right to own a firearm and by extension my right to self defense is
out the window.



Gee, I am on disability for a serious back problem and I am a member of the state militia.

However, due to the fact I have a HAM license they are not concerned so much with my ability to march as my ability to maintain effective communications.

Bama, you are trying to argue a point that, in actuality makes little sense.

Technically, every time you buy a firearm it IS registered, the only thing is that the retailer keeps the forms instead of sending them to some government agency.

If any agency wanted to confiscate weapons in the hands of civilians, all they have to do is go to all the retailers and pick up those forms.

You acknowledge the fact that the laws in place prevent confiscation, you even acknowledged the supreme court has ruled every case where a citizen's guns were confiscated has been in the favor of gun owners.

But you are really pushing the what if argument when it comes to registration.

But you also pointed out that they could start by banning guns with magazine capacity of over 7 rounds, and then use the registration forms to come and get them.

The forms kept by the retailers is all they need now if they do something like that.

What is to stop them?

The point I am trying very hard to make is the hard line on both sides is gonna end up biting us all in the ass.

And every time there is some incident like Vegas or Sandy Hook or Columbine or some other mass shooting the gun law lobby gains ground. And the hard line stance is giving it to them.

Yes, you defending your neighbor's property is very much in the line of the unorganized militia. The business owners in the LA riots were doing the same damn thing, and the courts recognized it as such.

As it stands now, the only legal, constitutional confiscation of guns is those belonging to people that are no longer legally allowed to have them. Yes, some fucking dick headed politicians tried to over step it, and people got fucked in the process, but, if we as gun owners dont stand up and do something to take the fucking bite out of some of the anti gun or more gun law arguments, we will eventually get fucked over with no recourse.

Christ I got a piece of property that is 250 acres, and a few 'well meaning neighbors' call the law every time I go over and shoot. The local sheriff deputies are tired of having to come by, the local dispatcher is tired of the bullshit calls, and I am not all that happy to see four squad cars pull up next to my barn.

The range I work part time at is constantly getting noise complaints filed against them, which means the owner has to go down to some hearing, he knows he is going to win the case, but it does not stop the bullshit.

Right now, if it was up to me, I buy every gun law proponent a one way ticket to whatever gun free country they want.

I am sick of hearing the 'second amendment was never meant for modern firearms' when in the same breath the preach how the bill of rights applies to the internet, cell phones, computers and every other modern technology that the founding fathers and framers of the constitution could never have dreamed of.

What is worse, is the gun laws we have now, were the products of some give and take, and gun owners won. We need to get back to that, or eventually we will lose.

You don't understand. I can barely use my right arm, and my right leg is worse, so no, I couldn't be in an organized militia.
If you read the 2nd again you will see that it does not only hold for those people in a militia let alone an organized militia.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 553
RE: The original arguments FOR the second amendment - 10/23/2017 1:49:18 PM   
Hardwild


Posts: 24
Joined: 10/17/2015
Status: offline
Your debating skills are legendary and a non marvel to behold. Trump fan I have long noted and you were compelled to bring up lies and Elementary Schoolies. What a piece of work you are. You should run for President of Americashire if your loon temperament did not decree you over qualified.

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 554
RE: The original arguments FOR the second amendment - 10/23/2017 5:03:03 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

You don't understand. I can barely use my right arm, and my right leg is worse, so no, I couldn't be in an organized militia.
If you read the 2nd again you will see that it does not only hold for those people in a militia let alone an organized militia.



The second amendment
quote:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."




10 U.S. Code § 246 - Militia: composition and classes
quote:

(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
(b) The classes of the militia are—
(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and
(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.


Now, in case you have not grasped the concept of unorganized

:not organized: such as
a :not brought into a coherent or well-ordered whole


Now, given your admitted impairments, as a registered gun owner, under the English common law which the United States adopted, you would be categorized as part of the unorganized militia, in other words, garrison duty, i.e, manning a desk, organizing logistics, or all the jobs that you can do, and thus allowing someone with a bit more mobility and ability to perform tasks and duties in the field.

As I stated god knows how many times, I have a bad back and very bad knees, the only function I could serve in the field is that of bait.

However, I also happen to have a HAM license, and since my interest in the hobby outside of talking to people in other countries, is in what is known as homebrew (designing and building custom radios and antennas) and refurbing boat anchors (bringing old, out dated radios back to life.)

So, not only do I know how to handle emergency radio communications, I can pretty much fix or modify radios from vacuum tube units to the modern stuff. So, on the annual emergency drills held by the local unit, I spend my time with the radios.

So, in other words, since in my army years, I never saw a garrison trooper in the field without at least a side arm, you would have absolutely no function that would aid the community in the event of an emergency when the governor called for both the state organized and unorganized (volunteers) to come out and render aid to the community?

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 555
RE: The original arguments FOR the second amendment - 10/23/2017 5:11:36 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

You don't understand. I can barely use my right arm, and my right leg is worse, so no, I couldn't be in an organized militia.
If you read the 2nd again you will see that it does not only hold for those people in a militia let alone an organized militia.



The second amendment
quote:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."




10 U.S. Code § 246 - Militia: composition and classes
quote:

(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
(b) The classes of the militia are—
(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and
(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.


Now, in case you have not grasped the concept of unorganized

:not organized: such as
a :not brought into a coherent or well-ordered whole


Now, given your admitted impairments, as a registered gun owner, under the English common law which the United States adopted, you would be categorized as part of the unorganized militia, in other words, garrison duty, i.e, manning a desk, organizing logistics, or all the jobs that you can do, and thus allowing someone with a bit more mobility and ability to perform tasks and duties in the field.

As I stated god knows how many times, I have a bad back and very bad knees, the only function I could serve in the field is that of bait.

However, I also happen to have a HAM license, and since my interest in the hobby outside of talking to people in other countries, is in what is known as homebrew (designing and building custom radios and antennas) and refurbing boat anchors (bringing old, out dated radios back to life.)

So, not only do I know how to handle emergency radio communications, I can pretty much fix or modify radios from vacuum tube units to the modern stuff. So, on the annual emergency drills held by the local unit, I spend my time with the radios.

So, in other words, since in my army years, I never saw a garrison trooper in the field without at least a side arm, you would have absolutely no function that would aid the community in the event of an emergency when the governor called for both the state organized and unorganized (volunteers) to come out and render aid to the community?

Still you have not shown where the right to bear arms is limited to militia members. It is the right of the people.
BTW in Al we don't have gun registration.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 556
RE: The original arguments FOR the second amendment - 10/23/2017 5:27:03 PM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline
The day we 'need' people of incoherent minds with whatever armaments to 'protect' us will be the day that all is lost and gone anyway.

Not that I'm worried.

While others have been saving ammo and gold and figuring out how they can get 50-round magazines without getting caught, some of us have been learning how to live off the land if it comes to point of all going to crap. Which point the gold and ammo sellers keep trying to push us to.

For whatever reason, some of the Native Americans are still willing to teach some pale faces like me about all this unarmed survival stuff. Things like, how to eat, e.g.

If it all goes to shit, I'm just going to sit back up in the hills and watch all these idiots kill each other for the first two weeks.

And yes, there will be some coming into camp with their 9 mil pistols, saying "what effing idiots."





< Message edited by Edwird -- 10/23/2017 5:50:09 PM >

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 557
RE: The original arguments FOR the second amendment - 10/23/2017 5:58:16 PM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961
So, not only do I know how to handle emergency radio communications, I can pretty much fix or modify radios from vacuum tube units to the modern stuff.


That's interesting. I hope you don't mind my encouraging you to join me in giving the Brits a bunch of crap for giving the US a bunch of crap about using the term "tubes" when they insist it should be "valves".

It's true that the grid bias between the cathode (heaters) and anode (plate) acts as a 'valve,' but try to get a straight answer out of them about "valve rectifiers." de Forrest himself said they shouldn't be called 'valves' for that very reason.

(Hint to others; there is no grid, ergo no 'valve' in a rectifier.)

Then we have the Germans, who produced some of the best tubes ever, calling them tubes. (Röhre, pl. Röhren)

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 558
RE: The original arguments FOR the second amendment - 10/23/2017 7:15:43 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


When each gun law is passed the proponents who had hailed as "the fix"
start calling it a beginning. Have you ever considered a beginning for what?
You also don't understand what "the militia" meant when I stop a person from
messing around my neighbors house I am filling their definition of the militia.
When people stopped a rape and held the attacker for the police that was
the militia. Now you tell me that because my right leg won't let me march I no longer
have the right to own a firearm and by extension my right to self defense is
out the window.



Gee, I am on disability for a serious back problem and I am a member of the state militia.

However, due to the fact I have a HAM license they are not concerned so much with my ability to march as my ability to maintain effective communications.

Bama, you are trying to argue a point that, in actuality makes little sense.

Technically, every time you buy a firearm it IS registered, the only thing is that the retailer keeps the forms instead of sending them to some government agency.

If any agency wanted to confiscate weapons in the hands of civilians, all they have to do is go to all the retailers and pick up those forms.

You acknowledge the fact that the laws in place prevent confiscation, you even acknowledged the supreme court has ruled every case where a citizen's guns were confiscated has been in the favor of gun owners.

But you are really pushing the what if argument when it comes to registration.

But you also pointed out that they could start by banning guns with magazine capacity of over 7 rounds, and then use the registration forms to come and get them.

The forms kept by the retailers is all they need now if they do something like that.

What is to stop them?

The point I am trying very hard to make is the hard line on both sides is gonna end up biting us all in the ass.

And every time there is some incident like Vegas or Sandy Hook or Columbine or some other mass shooting the gun law lobby gains ground. And the hard line stance is giving it to them.

Yes, you defending your neighbor's property is very much in the line of the unorganized militia. The business owners in the LA riots were doing the same damn thing, and the courts recognized it as such.

As it stands now, the only legal, constitutional confiscation of guns is those belonging to people that are no longer legally allowed to have them. Yes, some fucking dick headed politicians tried to over step it, and people got fucked in the process, but, if we as gun owners dont stand up and do something to take the fucking bite out of some of the anti gun or more gun law arguments, we will eventually get fucked over with no recourse.

Christ I got a piece of property that is 250 acres, and a few 'well meaning neighbors' call the law every time I go over and shoot. The local sheriff deputies are tired of having to come by, the local dispatcher is tired of the bullshit calls, and I am not all that happy to see four squad cars pull up next to my barn.

The range I work part time at is constantly getting noise complaints filed against them, which means the owner has to go down to some hearing, he knows he is going to win the case, but it does not stop the bullshit.

Right now, if it was up to me, I buy every gun law proponent a one way ticket to whatever gun free country they want.

I am sick of hearing the 'second amendment was never meant for modern firearms' when in the same breath the preach how the bill of rights applies to the internet, cell phones, computers and every other modern technology that the founding fathers and framers of the constitution could never have dreamed of.

What is worse, is the gun laws we have now, were the products of some give and take, and gun owners won. We need to get back to that, or eventually we will lose.

If we got your laws how long do you think it would be before they applied AD fitness standards to the "militia. Then your right to bear arms willi
disappear.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 559
RE: The original arguments FOR the second amendment - 10/23/2017 7:35:32 PM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline
Getting back to the OP;

Why is it that every other amendment and every other article in the original law of the land (the constitution) is expected to sit aside and quiver in fear of this one amendment?

Tell us, dear OP, why the second amendment circumvents and supposedly presides above all else?

And fuck the rest of the world and what anybody else thinks, etc. while we're at it.

Hey, I'm on board with this. I think the 2 yr. olds shooting mom in the head have an excellent record so far, no collateral damage to anybody else in the store to speak of, in that endeavor to participate in evolutionary advance in an active way.




< Message edited by Edwird -- 10/23/2017 7:55:28 PM >

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 560
Page:   <<   < prev  25 26 27 [28] 29   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The original arguments FOR the second amendment Page: <<   < prev  25 26 27 [28] 29   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.696