Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

Why are conservative such hypocrites with sexual abuse scandals?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Why are conservative such hypocrites with sexual abuse scandals? Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Why are conservative such hypocrites with sexual abuse ... - 12/7/2017 8:31:19 PM   
Tkman117


Posts: 1353
Joined: 5/21/2012
Status: offline
I remember back during the election many member states of the right wing here and on other platforms constantly bringing up the “sexual assaults” of Bill Clinton. Plus one of the most discussed threads currently is about al Franken, a Democrat accused of sexual harassment. And yet these same conservatives say nothing about Trump outright admitting to sexually assaulting women on tape amid a considerable number of allegations from women. While Roy Moore doesn’t have the same kind of self admission as Trump, the fact that there are so many women coming forward suggests there is a lot smoke for there to be no fire. So I ask this: why are the allegations of women against Democrats more damning than those against republicans in the eyes of conservatives? It’s not that I don’t know the answer, it’s fairly obvious, but I want to ask the conservatives here why they think this way. Why do conservatives hold their opponents to a standard they are happy to disregard? Why do they support a president who admitted to assaulting women while at the same time previously calling for Al Franken’s resignation? Please explain why this double standard is accceptible.
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Why are conservative such hypocrites with sexual ab... - 12/7/2017 8:36:47 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
abortion, tax plan, abortion, trumps agenda, and abortion
God is on their side.
women arent.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Tkman117)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Why are conservative such hypocrites with sexual ab... - 12/7/2017 8:41:53 PM   
Marini


Posts: 3629
Joined: 2/14/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tkman117

I remember back during the election many member states of the right wing here and on other platforms constantly bringing up the “sexual assaults” of Bill Clinton. Plus one of the most discussed threads currently is about al Franken, a Democrat accused of sexual harassment. And yet these same conservatives say nothing about Trump outright admitting to sexually assaulting women on tape amid a considerable number of allegations from women. While Roy Moore doesn’t have the same kind of self admission as Trump, the fact that there are so many women coming forward suggests there is a lot smoke for there to be no fire. So I ask this: why are the allegations of women against Democrats more damning than those against republicans in the eyes of conservatives? It’s not that I don’t know the answer, it’s fairly obvious, but I want to ask the conservatives here why they think this way. Why do conservatives hold their opponents to a standard they are happy to disregard? Why do they support a president who admitted to assaulting women while at the same time previously calling for Al Franken’s resignation? Please explain why this double standard is accceptible.


Good luck with this one!
I don't have a dog in this fight.

IMHO, both sides are more concerned with "winning" then any allegations these days.
It is about blind partisanship, and about winning.

Definition of partisan from Merriam Webster:
a firm adherent to a party, faction, cause, or person; especially : one exhibiting blind, prejudiced, and unreasoning allegiance political partisans who see only one side of the problem

This defines most on here and in general, it defines the left and the right.

_____________________________

As always, To EACH their Own.
"And as we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same. "
Nelson Mandela
Life-long Democrat, not happy at all with Democratic Party.
NOT a Republican/Moderate and free agent

(in reply to Tkman117)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Why are conservative such hypocrites with sexual ab... - 12/7/2017 8:47:34 PM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
FR

I actually have not been following Roy Moore case at all. First of all, he is running a election. And I think voters can decide whether they believe he is a sexual criminal or not. Because in his case, his judgement would be through the votes.

I also have not been following Al Franken case. But apparently he eventually succumb to pressure and resign.

But to say Trump admitted to sexually assaulting women non-consensually. Is just a leftie twisting his words again. He never did such thing.

He was just bragging about how his status get these women who are willing to give him access to them. Which was very ungentlemanly of him, but it was a private men to men bragging conversation.




(in reply to Marini)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Why are conservative such hypocrites with sexual ab... - 12/7/2017 9:02:52 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tkman117

I remember back during the election many member states of the right wing here and on other platforms constantly bringing up the “sexual assaults” of Bill Clinton. Plus one of the most discussed threads currently is about al Franken, a Democrat accused of sexual harassment. And yet these same conservatives say nothing about Trump outright admitting to sexually assaulting women on tape amid a considerable number of allegations from women. While Roy Moore doesn’t have the same kind of self admission as Trump, the fact that there are so many women coming forward suggests there is a lot smoke for there to be no fire. So I ask this: why are the allegations of women against Democrats more damning than those against republicans in the eyes of conservatives? It’s not that I don’t know the answer, it’s fairly obvious, but I want to ask the conservatives here why they think this way. Why do conservatives hold their opponents to a standard they are happy to disregard? Why do they support a president who admitted to assaulting women while at the same time previously calling for Al Franken’s resignation? Please explain why this double standard is accceptible.

There were pictures of Franken and the only "proof" against Moore he asks
for it to be examined by an expert and his accuser won't allow it.
Don't Rep. get to wait 20 years to call it a fake like the Dems did ?
After all you want them both to play by the same rules.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Tkman117)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Why are conservative such hypocrites with sexual ab... - 12/7/2017 9:05:08 PM   
heavyblinker


Posts: 3623
Status: offline
Conservatives tend to defend/justify/downplay/rationalize sexual assault whereas the left tends to show greater concern/sensitivity.
So when it's someone on the left being accused, there's a greater sense of hypocrisy involved.

It's not like the right will ever miss a chance to pile on.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Why are conservative such hypocrites with sexual ab... - 12/7/2017 9:10:12 PM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline
Maybe it started with Bill Clinton getting blow jobs in the oval office as president. Every democrat saw nothing wrong with it.

(in reply to Tkman117)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Why are conservative such hypocrites with sexual ab... - 12/7/2017 9:23:22 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
liar

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Why are conservative such hypocrites with sexual ab... - 12/7/2017 9:36:15 PM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic 25 NOV 2017 4:58:11 PM


quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


When the answers to a debate argument are:

"You're fat"

"Your clothes suck"

"You're stupid"

"You're a racist"

"Your skin is orange"

The person making such ground-breaking statements has already conceded.





oh thats very true, so very very true




_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Why are conservative such hypocrites with sexual ab... - 12/7/2017 9:48:42 PM   
Marini


Posts: 3629
Joined: 2/14/2010
Status: offline
None of us, need a crystal ball to figure out how this discussion is going to go!

Let the best "defender" of "their side" win!!!

LOL





_____________________________

As always, To EACH their Own.
"And as we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same. "
Nelson Mandela
Life-long Democrat, not happy at all with Democratic Party.
NOT a Republican/Moderate and free agent

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Why are conservative such hypocrites with sexual ab... - 12/7/2017 9:53:19 PM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline

Nah, Marini. I have no "side" in this. I think all predators are scumbags; sexual or otherwise.

I'm just keepin' some peoples' egos in check. Ya know?





_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to Marini)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Why are conservative such hypocrites with sexual ab... - 12/7/2017 10:02:40 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic 25 NOV 2017 4:58:11 PM


quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


When the answers to a debate argument are:

"You're fat"

"Your clothes suck"

"You're stupid"

"You're a racist"

"Your skin is orange"

The person making such ground-breaking statements has already conceded.





oh thats very true, so very very true




are you stalking me pwincess?

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Why are conservative such hypocrites with sexual ab... - 12/7/2017 10:04:49 PM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

are you stalking me pwincess?


Nah. Waste of my time. I'm just a perpetual insomniac, killing time on one of my favorite forum sites.

(unless you're defining "stalking" as "responding to obvious inconsistencies of other posters"?)





_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Why are conservative such hypocrites with sexual ab... - 12/7/2017 10:26:01 PM   
JVoV


Posts: 3226
Joined: 3/9/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

Maybe it started with Bill Clinton getting blow jobs in the oval office as president. Every democrat saw nothing wrong with it.


Sexual encounters between consenting adults. How shocking.

Frankly, I believe that was none of our business. Nothing illegal occurred between Bubba & Monica. But then Monica was sold out by her supposed friend, Linda Tripp. To me, that was the real crime and sexual harassment. An embarrassed Bubba lied under oath in a civil suit deposition, and then it became a much bigger issue than it ever should have.

Clinton was impeached for lying under oath, not for anything sexual. The cigars, blowjobs, and blue dress sold gossip rags, but there was nothing for anyone to care about, except maybe Hillary. And a drycleaner.

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Why are conservative such hypocrites with sexual ab... - 12/7/2017 10:30:07 PM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

Maybe it started with Bill Clinton getting blow jobs in the oval office as president. Every democrat saw nothing wrong with it.


Sexual encounters between consenting adults. How shocking.

Frankly, I believe that was none of our business. Nothing illegal occurred between Bubba & Monica. But then Monica was sold out by her supposed friend, Linda Tripp. To me, that was the real crime and sexual harassment. An embarrassed Bubba lied under oath in a civil suit deposition, and then it became a much bigger issue than it ever should have.

Clinton was impeached for lying under oath, not for anything sexual. The cigars, blowjobs, and blue dress sold gossip rags, but there was nothing for anyone to care about, except maybe Hillary.


Wow! We agree, whole-heartedly!

Even back then, I told everyone I know the commander-in-heat's response should have been: "That's between (amongst?) me, my wife and Monica." Of course, I also bought into the rumors of HRC being a lesbian and believing that she and Bill had an "understanding".

Now, that doesn't address the other accusations against Slick Willy. Those are horses of another color. That's whence my derision and loathing of him originate.





_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to JVoV)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Why are conservative such hypocrites with sexual ab... - 12/7/2017 10:38:45 PM   
JVoV


Posts: 3226
Joined: 3/9/2015
Status: offline
Kenneth Starr was very thorough in his investigations of any possible wrongdoing by Bubba or Mrs Bubba.

A real overachiever, since he was brought in to investigate Whitewater.

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Why are conservative such hypocrites with sexual ab... - 12/7/2017 10:41:00 PM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline

Did he get anywhere near Gennifer Flowers, Paula Jones, or Jaunita Brodderick?

I don't think he did. I could be wrong, but I doubt it.





_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to JVoV)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Why are conservative such hypocrites with sexual ab... - 12/7/2017 10:41:18 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
OH and news before I go...

Trent franks resigning because he wanted to make the handmaids tale come tru.
At least he resigned....
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/07/trent-franks-expected-to-resign-286967

Archdiocese of New York pays out 40 million between 189 victims(not each)
https://archny.org/news/ircp-update

Body cam of Ralph shortey at a motel 8.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5148955/Bodycam-footage-Ralph-Shortey-motel-young-boy.html

Story about Daryl Metcalfe who had a hissy fit about being touched by a gay man in committee.
I Appreciate, he doesnt like being touched...I wish every woman(and man) who felt that they were abused, would use the same words to their "abusers", but im wondering if he will put in a sexual harrassment claim.????
heres the story and vid from huffn poo.


The “Touch Heard Round the Internet” has shown the entire Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and the nation, something that those of us who serve alongside House Republican Daryl Metcalfe have known for a very long time. The extreme tea party legislator has made his career by bombastically pursuing discriminatory and hateful policies, aided by his party and the unique position of power he holds in our legislature.

Daryl Metcalfe was elected almost two decades ago, but really only began gaining power after a statewide pay raise scandal and the birth of the national tea party movement. He made a name for himself attacking Philadelphia’s early LGBT marketing efforts (the campaign would go on to win national awards), criticizing a group of military veterans promoting environmental policy as “traitors to the oath he or she took to defend the Constitution of our great nation,” and losing an election for lieutenant governor.

He was seemingly rewarded for his extremism as the right-wing and tea party power brokers around the state and country showed their support and pushed for his rise. What followed was his selection by House Republican Leadership as the Chairman of the powerful State Government Committee, setting the backdrop for a near decade-long reign of discrimination and denigration.

As in most states, proposed legislation is sent to committees made up of smaller groups of legislators who take the first look at legislation. The work most committees do is self-explanatory. The education bills go to the Education Committee, health care bills go to the Health Committee. Sometimes it’s not so obvious, like the State Government Committee.

As the majority chairman of the State Government Committee, Daryl Metcalfe is actually charged with overseeing many of the most critical civil rights bills and government reform bills in a state with almost no LGBT civil rights and massive, illegal gerrymandering. That’s right, he oversees the issues impacting the people he has attacked again and again.

In my five years serving under his committee chairmanship, I have seen him blatantly disrespect women, immigrants, people of color, and absolutely LGBT people like me and my communities. His past decade in office reads like a legislative record of hate, disrespect and fear-mongering ― from suing our state’s first out, married couples and pushing English-only bills, to forcing ultrasound wands on any woman considering an abortion.

During the first few months of my first term in office, the Supreme Court decided the groundbreaking United States v. Windsor case and I’d asked the Speaker for the opportunity to comment on the historic nature of the day to memorialize it within the legislative journal, which he granted. Upon taking to the House floor to speak, however, I was interrupted and ultimately my microphone was cut as a result of a then-secret objection led by Chairman Metcalfe. That night he chillingly told a local radio station: “I did not believe that as a member of that body that I should allow someone to make comments such as he was preparing to make that ultimately were just open rebellion against what the word of God has said, and just open rebellion against God’s law.” The fallout from his outburst and religious justification drew condemnation from both sides of the aisle and across the country, but had little impact on his assignment as the Chair of the Committee by the Republican leadership in the House.

It gets worse.

Midway through his career, Metcalfe founded an organization to oppose birthright citizenship and helped popularize fantasies like “anchor babies” and “illegal alien invasion,” along the way. In 2010, Metcalfe introduced a law to essentially deputize our state’s police officers as federal immigration agents to check the “papers” of anyone they suspected of being an “illegal alien.” He proudly copied the legislation made famous by Arizona’s similar attempt which was ultimately found to be unconstitutional.

His attacks on women’s rights and women in general have made him well-known to the pro-choice and women’s health advocacy communities. Metcalfe has repeatedly tried to ban funding for Planned Parenthood, despite the fact that existing federal law means no tax dollars are spent on abortions. He has promoted and voted for legislation to prohibit insurance companies participating in state exchanges from providing abortion coverage in an insurance plan, even at a woman’s own expense. Even now he is aggressively supporting the most restrictive abortion ban in the nation.

It still gets worse.

Using a thinly veiled attempt to address “voter fraud,” several years ago Metcalfe succeeded in passing one of the nation’s notorious voter ID bills. Ignoring all data regarding the rarity of such voter fraud, and knowing that these bills have the effect of massively limiting voter turnout among low income voters, women, seniors, and Democrats generally, Metcalfe celebrated the passage of his bill with a cake decorated like a voter ID.

During the expensive legal battle that followed, his legislation was ultimately ruled as “plainly unconstitutional” and “fraught with illegalities and dubious authority,” but not before Metcalfe said, “people out there that are too lazy to get up and get out there and get the ID.”

Just two years ago, in the fall of 2015, the chairman was hosting a bipartisan committee meeting on a “Sanctuary City” bill designed to punish cities like Philadelphia for refusing to give special treatment to federal immigration agents looking to deport nonviolent undocumented people. In the hours before the hearing, we learned that one of the “experts” he intended to bring before us was actually the head of what the Southern Policy Law Center calls a “nativist extremist group,” the chairman defended his decision on the House floor by arguing that he was actually just a white nationalist and not a white supremacist. His remarks drew a strong response publicly but again the Republican leadership left him as their chosen chair of the committee. You can’t make this stuff up.

And then there was his outburst in that committee this past week. If you had asked any of us who attended the meeting, Republican or Democrat, we would have told you that the fireworks were going to be the second item on the schedule, a union-busting “paycheck protection” bill the far right always throws at us this time of year. No one thought they would come during the first and only other business on the schedule, a minor land use bill. Instead, what we got is another one of those moments I’ll never forget about my experience as a legislator.

Twenty five minutes into the meeting, and without any warning, the Republican chairman, sitting at the front of the room next to his Democratic counterpart, leaned into his microphone and loudly interrupted the hearing with this:

Look, I’m a heterosexual. I have a wife, I love my wife. I don’t like men, as you might, but don’t...stop touching me all the time! It’s like, keep your hands to yourself. Like if you want to touch somebody, you have people on your side of the aisle that might like it. I don’t!

The video does the awkwardness of the moment justice as you can see the reaction of staff for both members immediately push away in extreme discomfort.

The video also clearly shows that the two men sit alongside one another in tight quarters and Representative Bradford, the Democratic chair and a delightful, straight father of four, very gently placed his hand on Metcalfe’s forearm directly next to his own, in a brief and completely innocuous way. He quickly apologized, saying he was attempting to “beg” permission for more time to speak.

“Then beg, don’t touch,” said Chairman Metcalfe.

Now I’ve never grown accustomed to the chairman constantly interrupting my women colleagues, slyly referencing the urban neighborhoods my black colleagues represent, maligning the heritage of my Latino colleagues, and attacking the LGBTQ communities I know and love the most. I don’t want that kind of thick skin and I have pushed back against him as often as I can. Our relationship is filled with heated exchanges and opposing legislation. But this was new.

In the moment, as the only openly gay person on the Committee, although certainly not in the room, I did what countless other LGBTQ people, women, people of color, and so many “others” do when their identity is being openly mocked in front of others, I made a joke (a good one) that made even the Republicans laugh out loud, but also at Metcalfe and his outburst. The whole experience was baffling and infuriating.

By the end of the day, the exchange had gained statewide attention. By the next morning, the national morning news and talk shows were showing the outburst and I’m certain it played a major role in abruptly ending the legislature’s session for the week. But still nothing has happened to Chairman Metcalfe. The Republican leadership hasn’t even hinted at removing him from his powerful position and he’s made it clear that he has no intentions of giving it up voluntarily.

However, I have hope. Within a day, Governor Tom Wolf had issued a statement on Twitter, saying, “In light of this documented history of discriminatory statements, I urge House leadership to re-examine whether it is appropriate for Rep. Metcalfe to continue controlling the committee that oversees civil rights legislation.”

The state-wide LGBTQ equality organization EqualityPA has issued a statement saying that “t’s past time for Speaker Turzai to remove Daryl Metcalfe as the chair of the House State Government Committee,” citing his “long series of homophobic and xenophobic actions” during his tenure. They’ve also circulated a petition calling on the Republican leader to remove Metcalfe from his position as chair of the State Government committee.

At least one large union, SEIU Healthcare Pennsylvania, has joined their efforts, saying that “Speaker Turzai has a responsibility to ensure that the state House is accountable to Pennsylvanians of all colors, creeds, and orientations, and that “Chairman Metcalfe has failed on all counts.”

I agree, and I signed the petition.

Daryl Metcalfe isn’t just a right-wing extremist. He’s not just a homophobe who wants to take health care away from trans kids or let someone be fired for being gay. He’s also not just someone who tries to rationalize the difference between the White Nationalists and White Supremacists. He’s not even just someone who ignores and discounts women around him.

All of these things make him hateful and vile, but he has a right to be all of those things. Hell, he even has a right to his seat so long as his constituents keep voting him there.

Why he’s so different is because of the power he’s been given by a select few of his Republican leaders and the extreme and catastrophic way in which he has wielded that power. That a man with this broad and outrageous record can be in charge of the success or failure of LGBT non-discrimination bills, anti-gerrymandering bills, ethics reform bills and so much more, given his utterly broken value system and moral compass is why he’s so different.

But he has no right to be chairman, and we have every right, and I believe an obligation, to demand that those elected officials who have given him his throne now take it away.

I will be joining every organization and individual calling for the House Republican leadership to remove Chairman Daryl Metcalfe from his powerful position overseeing the rights of the people he hates the most, and I hope you’ll join us.

Daryl Metcalfe must resign his leadership position.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/pennsylvania-daryl-metcalfe_us_5a2972ace4b03ece0300ceff?section=us_contributor
Brian Sims, Contributor
State Representative, Pennsylvania House of Representatives



Then Blake Farenthold
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/363890-gop-rep-mia-love-farenthold-should-resign and this from the texas tribune

https://www.texastribune.org/2017/12/07/us-house-ethics-committee-takes-closer-look-blake-farenthold-allegatio/
U.S. House Ethics Committee takes a closer look into Blake Farenthold allegations
The U.S. House Ethics Committee voted Thursday to establish a subcommittee to investigate allegations that U.S. Rep. Blake Farenthold sexually harassed a subordinate several years ago.

WASHINGTON — Members of the U.S. House Ethics Committee unanimously voted Thursday to establish a subcommittee to investigate allegations that U.S. Rep. Blake Farenthold, a Corpus Christi Republican, sexually harassed a subordinate several years ago.

The matter appeared to be resolved two years ago. But it resurfaced as a heightened awareness of sexual harassment has swept workplaces across the country, including U.S. congressional offices.

Back in 2014, Farenthold's former communications director, Lauren Green, filed a sexual harassment lawsuit against the congressman's office. The two parties settled in undisclosed terms in 2015.

On Friday, Politico revealed that settlement included $84,000 in taxpayer funds. The four-term congressman said on Monday he would pay back the money.

The Texas Tribune thanks its sponsors. Become one.

The action did little to calm the storm sweeping Capitol Hill.

Intrigue and concern over sexual harassment is at the center of nearly every conversation in Washington, and Farenthold's political fate is a frequent topic of conversation among members of both parties.


Ahhhhhhhhhh its friday, mueller day...


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Why are conservative such hypocrites with sexual ab... - 12/7/2017 10:48:47 PM   
JVoV


Posts: 3226
Joined: 3/9/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


Did he get anywhere near Gennifer Flowers, Paula Jones, or Jaunita Brodderick?

I don't think he did. I could be wrong, but I doubt it.




Jones was pursuing the civil case at the time, which is where Bubba lied under oath. So yeah, he got to the one, which is how she got nearly a million dollar settlement.

I forget which of the other two couldn't decide if it had been consensual or not, though I wanna say Flowers.

Actually, Broaddrick is the one that claimed it was consensual, during Jones's case. Flowers seems to have been consensual all along?

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Why are conservative such hypocrites with sexual ab... - 12/7/2017 10:51:55 PM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV
Jones was pursuing the civil case at the time, which is where Bubba lied under oath. So yeah, he got to the one, which is how she got nearly a million dollar settlement.

I forget which of the other two couldn't decide if it had been consensual or not, though I wanna say Flowers.


Yeah, if memory serves Brodderick has never said anything that varies far from: "He raped me". I think Flowers may have been consensual, but if he did rape Brodderick, I think it might show a pattern that kind of puts Flowers' consent into question.





_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to JVoV)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Why are conservative such hypocrites with sexual abuse scandals? Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078