quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul (Emphasis by DaddySatyr)
Yes Allred screwed up here. She chased an ambulance and rushed her facts. But it was not presented to any court, so no ethics violations can actually be claimed.

And it still doesn't' change any of the story.

I'm wondering if you're making this claim based upon any evidence? The author of the article, obviously, believes there's been some kind of filing. That is the "fact" upon which I based my claim of tampering with "evidence" which is what Lucy (specifically) and you (by inference) contended.

If there was some kind of court filing (civil or criminal) in which the yearbook was presented, that made the book "evidence" in that case. If the yearbook was tampered with (Allred and Nelson seem to be admitting that) then a charge of tampering with evidence would be appropriate.

Can you state, definitively - with some kind of evidence to back it up - that the author is wrong and there has been no filing to either civil or criminal court?

. o 0 (Forget the "criminal" court. I'll concede that, based upon SoL)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul (Emphasis by DaddySatyr)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Was that the one without "evidence of tampering", and the non existent "court" it could be produced at?

Yep, that would be the one. Still waiting on him to show how what he said wasn't a lie.

You accuse me of being a liar. I re-present the evidence upon which I based my claim.

While I may have been mistaken in believing that author's contention, how does that make me a liar?

This is the kind of bullshit I'm always on about. I didn't lie. I gave the author the benefit of the doubt.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul

Which I acknowledged was an error on my part in post #51.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul
I acknowledge that using the word 'lie' was incorrect on my part. You simply hadn't done your research and relied on fake news.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul

Which I acknowledged was an error on my part in post #51.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul
I acknowledge that using the word 'lie' was incorrect on my part. You simply hadn't done your research and relied on fake news.

So, just so I can "get the rules right" for the future, is AOL or Yahoo "fake news"?

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

when you consider my understanding and usage of the word "hyperpartisan" relies, as I have explained, on a heavy emphasis of the descriptor "UNCRITICAL" in terms of thinking and support, no, I don't think of my looking at the left as the "enemy" as hyperpartisan.

that doesn't mean I hate them, or don't value them as people, or have respect for them---ive said numerous times, we think differently and we value differing things---however, in so much as I find what they value incompatible with what I value, I nevertheless want to defeat them and in that regard, they can rightly be viewed as "the enemy."

an extra thought on the "respect" line--given the nature of the comrades here, there is very little to none of that in me for them.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


Daily Caller is reporting that lowlife scum Democrat House Intelligence Committee members apparently leaked confidential information about an email sent to Donald Trump Jr that Trump Jr didn't even read... And CNN changed the details around to make it seem like a big deal

Might as well make the howling mad leftist idiots even more insane, right

Just another normal ordinary day for the leftist propagandists running the nation's "news" business

CNN Botches Major ‘Bombshell’ Alleging Contacts Between Don Jr. And WikiLeaks

CNN misreported key details of an offer made to Donald Trump Jr. last year of a batch of stolen Wikileaks documents.

The story, which CNN published on Friday and covered extensively on TV, was touted as the first evidence that the Trump campaign was given a heads-up about documents stolen from Democrats.

But the story appears to have been riddled with errors, while also lacking key context.

Perhaps the most jarring error in the CNN report is the date on which Trump Jr. was sent the email. The network reported that a person named Mike Erickson emailed Trump Jr. and others on the Trump campaign on Sept. 4, 2016, with a link to Wikileaks documents as well as a decryption key to access them.


The email also offered access to emails that had been stolen from former Sec. of State Colin Powell, according to CNN.

But a copy of the email provided to The Daily Caller shows that Erickson sent the email on Sept. 14.

That date is significant because WikiLeaks had released a batch of stolen documents on Sept. 13. The group touted its release of the DNC documents, which were published by Guccifer 2.0.

...

How CNN got its report so wrong is unclear.

The article states that its information was based on a read-out of the Trump Jr. email provided by an unnamed source. Trump Jr.’s lawyer, Alan Futerfas, speculated on Friday that the source was on the Democratic side of the House Intelligence Committee, which interviewed Trump Jr. earlier this week.

Erickson also appears not to be a super-secret Kremlin agent. The Post identified him as the president of an aviation management company.

Attempts made by The Daily Caller to contact him were unsuccessful.

Futerfas, the lawyer for Trump Jr., said that the real estate executive received “tons of unsolicited emails” during the campaign.

“The email was never read or responded to — and the House Intelligence Committee knows this,” he said in a statement.

MORE

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

So your point is...

CNN, made a minor error in its reporting and corrected it (and the Daily Caller hyped it) ---> Therefore the entire administration is innocent of any wrongdoing?

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr



Yeah, based upon the standard set, here, we have these "fake news" organizations:

AOL
CNN
Bloomberg (erroneously reported Trump Deutsche Bank subpoena)

I feel like Santa Claus

. o 0 (He's makin' a list and checkin' it twice ...)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
an extra thought on the "respect" line--given the nature of the comrades here,

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX
To most thinking people,

quote:

a major "news" organization lying about the facts in order to make a nothing story into a seemingly major political bombshell is rather more than a "minor error"

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

To most thinking people, a major "news" organization lying about the facts in order to make a nothing story into a seemingly major political bombshell is rather more than a "minor error"

quote:

BoscoX
It's okay though, we are used to you playing the part of a mindless hyperpartisan howler on here so by all means carry on

quote:

The U.S. Media Yesterday Suffered its Most Humiliating Debacle in Ages: Now Refuses All Transparency Over What Happened

FRIDAY WAS ONE of the most embarrassing days for the U.S. media in quite a long time. The humiliation orgy was kicked off by CNN, with MSNBC and CBS close behind, with countless pundits, commentators and operatives joining the party throughout the day. By the end of the day, it was clear that several of the nation’s largest and most influential news outlets had spread an explosive but completely false news story to millions of people, while refusing to provide any explanation of how it happened.

The spectacle began on Friday morning at 11:00 am EST, when the Most Trusted Name in News™ spent 12 straight minutes on air flamboyantly hyping an exclusive bombshell report that seemed to prove that WikiLeaks, last September, had secretly offered the Trump campaign, even Donald Trump himself, special access to the DNC emails before they were published on the internet. As CNN sees the world, this would prove collusion between the Trump family and WikiLeaks and, more importantly, between Trump and Russia, since the U.S. intelligence community regards WikiLeaks as an “arm of Russian intelligence,” and therefore, so does the U.S. media.

This entire revelation was based on an email which CNN strongly implied it had exclusively obtained and had in its possession. The email was sent by someone named “Michael J. Erickson” – someone nobody had heard of previously and whom CNN could not identify – to Donald Trump, Jr., offering a decryption key and access to DNC emails that WikiLeaks had “uploaded.” The email was a smoking gun, in CNN’s extremely excited mind, because it was dated September 4 – ten days before WikiLeaks began promoting access to those emails online – and thus proved that the Trump family was being offered special, unique access to the DNC archive: likely by WikiLeaks and the Kremlin.

It’s impossible to convey with words what a spectacularly devastating scoop CNN believed it had, so it’s necessary to watch it for yourself to see the tone of excitement, breathlessness and gravity the network conveyed as they clearly believed they were delivering a near-fatal blow on the Trump/Russia collusion story:


There was just one small problem with this story: it was fundamentally false, in the most embarrassing way possible. Hours after CNN broadcast its story – and then hyped it over and over and over – the Washington Post reported that CNN got the key fact of the story wrong.

MORE

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

why arent you commenting on fox, or gateway pundit, or breitbart, if you are angry about "lying" media?
oh thats right
you cant, with any substance.
As we have seen project veritas try to set up wa po, a false accusation and lie about roy moore,
it seems that "unnamed sources" to reporters are getting things wrong(what a shock)
I wonder who is arranging that
(must be hillary)