Jahnaca
Posts: 726
Joined: 8/28/2006 Status: offline
|
Greetings Torvold I don’t think Norman was anti marriage/free companionship at all. In fact I know he was highly supportive of our marriage union and the love that is created within. What I think he was getting at is how we view the relationship. These institutions do not create personal reality, you do. As Norman clearly presented in his book Imaginative Sex, and further highlighted in his Gorean series. The quote in question from Blood Brothers shows how one can have a different view then the status quo. This does exist here on Earth. When you take marriage out of the legal definition you will find many people view and practice the institution very differently then someone else. Thus creating your own personal reality within a mainstream institution. In the Gor series we also see this, many men freed their slaves to become companions, often shown in the books without the whole process of obtaining contracts etc. It just happens. Should Norman have been opposed to this institution, and feel honestly slavery was the only road, I highly doubt so many main characters would have tossed this ideal aside in favor of the other lesser institution (all these women were already in slavery the supposed superior institution). We won't even go into the snubbing the whole process commonly discussed on forums like this for a much more direct approch. In the quote from Blood Brothers you notice a key word used, “some” indicating that some have taken a different approach to the “business partner” ideal that other Goreans view free companionships (see the line just above the quote in question). It means even though they were still bound by the same legalities of that institution they viewed it differently. Doesn’t mean it is the definition of the institution, or even how it’s supposed to be viewed but just highlighting different points of view (personal reality). The quote also presented a theory regarding dominance and submission, which was culturally ingrained by the Goreans with the institution of slavery. Within that institution it allowed Goreans to participate at the highest levels the concept of dominance and submission within a socially accepted relationship. It though doesn’t begin there, nor stop there. My dog practices dominance and submission every moment of her life, it is ingrained in her at the highest level. It is part of her social structure and all other canines. It is not master and slave, it simply is, dominance and submission in it’s most natural form. Norman used the slavery institution to highlight the possibility, we are left with recreating the ideals into our reality. Blood Brothers showed us how to incorporate the ideals of slavery within the other socially accepted institution called free companionships and still maintain the legality. (Creating their own reality). It leaves us with questions; if a dog can practice dominance and submission without the institution and understanding of slavery, can we? Can we look past the status quo definitions and create our own reality based on a fuller understanding of men and women and these very biological truths? Or are we so enslaved by what others define these institutions, we can not see past it and must become, just like them? IWYW Jahna
|