sleazy
Posts: 781
Joined: 11/23/2006 From: UK Status: offline
|
Ok, I am not fully aware of the story behind this, so can only go on what is written here..... Surely if she is using military aircraft then it cannot be a campaign favour as all tax payers are footing a piece of the bill? However if {insert corporation here} pays for a private jet to whisk a politician home then that does create an issue in my eyes. I do think that extending the use of tax funded aircraft to include too much of her entourage is a bad thing to an extent, a dead-head seat on a military aircraft making the journey anyway is more acceptable for a sisters asstistant deputy secretary than laying on full aircraft and crew.
_____________________________
Opinion is packaged by weight not volume, contents may settle during transit. Consult you medical practitioner. Do not attempt to stop moving parts by hand. Ensure all safety shields in place. Open this way up. Do not expose to temperatures exceeding 50C
|