Mercnbeth
Posts: 11766
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: sublizzie In reading one of the threads I saw something that sparked a question. I have heard of "do me" submissives. Are there such a thing as "do me" Dominants? If so, how would you define them? this slave has always considered a "do-me" submissive to be a slang term for "bottom" a compliment to the "do-me" Dominant, aka "top". neither one is looking for the "One" or into romantic entanglements, just some sensation play for a time being. they submit to each others desires for that session and then go on with their day, or lives, as the case may be. entering into a D/s or M/s relationship structure with one of these types and expecting them to all of a sudden grow submissive or Dominant proclivities outside of that particular negotiated scene is where, in this slave's opinion, the negative attitudes stem from on both sides of the slash. Edited to add: And what, if anything, is wrong with that? Hell, I spent 20+ very happy years in the company of, and as a personal practicing "Do-Me". If you desire the activities commonly practiced in this 'lifestyle' and had to wait for a deep personal relationship, we'd be waiting more than doing, if we got to 'do' at all. I know some speak of experiencing, or the hope of experiencing, a deep spiritual catharsis in the hands of their "one". But in the meantime, have some fun with a "do-me". Its not a bad thing.
< Message edited by Mercnbeth -- 3/3/2007 8:25:12 AM >
|