quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

Gerrymandering is the ONLY way Republicans can maintain a majority in the House. (And BTW: I live in a very gerrymandered district, albeit by Democrats)

quote:

That you howlers really believe that only one side is the big bad boogieman re gerrymandering

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


Fun thread, in retrospect.

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

Still true

quote:

Massachusetts is more red than Tennessee is blue.

Massachusetts has not had a Republican member of Congress in 30 years.

If Massachusetts has 0 red districts, Tennessee should have 0 blue districts.

Democrats are just mad that Republicans are finally doing the same thing they have been doing for years.

https://x.com/alx/status/2052467888746061980?s=20

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

Still true

How are you enjoying your mindwash so far.

quote:

Massachusetts is more red than Tennessee is blue.

Massachusetts has not had a Republican member of Congress in 30 years.

If Massachusetts has 0 red districts, Tennessee should have 0 blue districts.

Democrats are just mad that Republicans are finally doing the same thing they have been doing for years.

https://x.com/alx/status/2052467888746061980?s=20

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

Without gerrymandering, we would not have a Republican controlled House (and would not have had one for decades)

quote:



GROK's CONGRESSIONAL MAP: What would the MOST FAIR U.S. House map look like if we followed the Founding Fathers’ Principles?

- Apportion seats strictly by population (census)

- Draw compact, contiguous districts inside each state only

- No partisan data, no racial engineering, no weird shapes

- Prioritize whole counties & communities

RESULT: A clean map with 265-285 R to 150-170 D seats in a 50/50 nation.

Not gerrymandering - just geography.

This is what neutral, compact redistricting naturally produces.

The Founders wanted local geographic representation, not national proportional math.

No salamanders.
No tentacles.
Just logical districts.

True fairness under the Constitution isn’t forcing 50/50 seats.

It’s letting Americans vote where they actually live.

THIS MAP HONORS THE CONSTITUTION'S DESIGN.

What do you think?

MAP VIA: @JeremiahW2044

https://x.com/OcrazioCornPop/status/2053193248974262502?s=20

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

Without gerrymandering, we would not have a Republican controlled House (and would not have had one for decades)

You know that because you're in a cult.

But what if we asked nonpartisan AI, just for giggles

quote:



GROK's CONGRESSIONAL MAP: What would the MOST FAIR U.S. House map look like if we followed the Founding Fathers’ Principles?

- Apportion seats strictly by population (census)

- Draw compact, contiguous districts inside each state only

- No partisan data, no racial engineering, no weird shapes

- Prioritize whole counties & communities

RESULT: A clean map with 265-285 R to 150-170 D seats in a 50/50 nation.

Not gerrymandering - just geography.

This is what neutral, compact redistricting naturally produces.

The Founders wanted local geographic representation, not national proportional math.

No salamanders.
No tentacles.
Just logical districts.

True fairness under the Constitution isn’t forcing 50/50 seats.

It’s letting Americans vote where they actually live.

THIS MAP HONORS THE CONSTITUTION'S DESIGN.

What do you think?

MAP VIA: @JeremiahW2044

https://x.com/OcrazioCornPop/status/2053193248974262502?s=20

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


Compared too... This?

https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/2052832960328384531?s=20

Notice that FIVE districts originate in ONE small very blue area that is populated by federal government drones

The extreme but typical leftist-style gerrymander that Obama DIRECTLY supported.

Video - https://x.com/EmiliosOpinions/status/2053333395980357995?s=20