slaverosebeauty -> RE: "Women hedge bets by banking their eggs" (5/13/2007 9:02:49 AM)
|
New idea, why not have children when you are boiologically suppose to, like in your 20s and 30s, instead of in your 40s and 50s; it may be the new 'in' thing, but, it causes more problems, ie - birth defects, difficulty in pregnancy and childbirth. IVF, etc should be used with couples that are of child bearing age that have not been able to concieve by natural means, not people who decide at the end of their childbearing [physiological] years, that they want a baby. Thier is a reason that its called a 'biological time clock' its true. When I hit 30, thats it, no more babies, its not safe and its not practcial; I want to enjoy those years with my parnter, not, be going trough IVF because we waited to long. {I do have a small child, I gave birth just before I turned 20, and do plan on having a few more before I hit 30, so I am not being hypocrytical}
|
|
|
|