RE: Why?

RE: Why? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress

Message

kittiekatt -> RE: Why? (5/13/2007 5:07:00 PM)
would you like some cotton candy? walks u up to the booth and buys some

AquaticSub -> RE: Why? (5/13/2007 5:14:09 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SunNMoon Well theres always DNA testing... lol I'm sorry that's the first thing that popped into my head. [:D] DNA testing isn't actually foolproof. It proves that no one in a million or so people was there. Considering the earth's population - yes it could have been someone else, however the odds are low. Even for testing of parentage, it's not perfect. A very rare condition gives people two different DNA "fingerprints". This condition was only discovered when a mother applying for welfare was turned down because the test said she wasn't the mother of her baby. It was proven that she had this condition by, with her next child, a court appointed person sat through her labor, watched the baby come out and then watched it's blood be tested. Again the test said the baby (that the court appointee watched come out of her) was not her child.

kittiekatt -> RE: Why? (5/13/2007 5:15:56 PM)
Fine! Ruin our fun! :p

jayded34 -> RE: Why? (5/13/2007 5:18:21 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: AquaticSub quote: ORIGINAL: SunNMoon Well theres always DNA testing... lol I'm sorry that's the first thing that popped into my head. [:D] DNA testing isn't actually foolproof. It proves that no one in a million or so people was there. Considering the earth's population - yes it could have been someone else, however the odds are low. Even for testing of parentage, it's not perfect. A very rare condition gives people two different DNA "fingerprints". This condition was only discovered when a mother applying for welfare was turned down because the test said she wasn't the mother of her baby. It was proven that she had this condition by, with her next child, a court appointed person sat through her labor, watched the baby come out and then watched it's blood be tested. Again the test said the baby (that the court appointee watched come out of her) was not her child. Dont ya just hate it when someone thinks they know it all......and dont ya just hate it more when they are right? lol just messing with ya.....i actually never heard of that before...great info!

kittiekatt -> RE: Why? (5/13/2007 5:19:46 PM)
can u swear on here? cuz if u can id say thats f---ed :)

kittiekatt -> RE: Why? (5/13/2007 5:49:13 PM)
okie this is it pplz. im gonna close the thread. if u want to send me a msg as friends to chat id be happy to oblige. seeyah<3

SunNMoon -> RE: Why? (5/13/2007 5:51:53 PM)
Yes that's true I saw that awhile ago, the internal twin or something pretty cool with the DNA all mixing together, through really sad for the woman which had to experience that... Now back to the hijack… We have secret BDSM In Black technology working with the aliens to spread kinkiness through out the universe... Just have to put on my black ray bands quote: ORIGINAL: AquaticSub quote: ORIGINAL: SunNMoon Well theres always DNA testing... lol I'm sorry that's the first thing that popped into my head. [:D] DNA testing isn't actually foolproof. It proves that no one in a million or so people was there. Considering the earth's population - yes it could have been someone else, however the odds are low. Even for testing of parentage, it's not perfect. A very rare condition gives people two different DNA "fingerprints". This condition was only discovered when a mother applying for welfare was turned down because the test said she wasn't the mother of her baby. It was proven that she had this condition by, with her next child, a court appointed person sat through her labor, watched the baby come out and then watched it's blood be tested. Again the test said the baby (that the court appointee watched come out of her) was not her child.

kittiekatt -> RE: Why? (5/13/2007 5:56:33 PM)
actually i dont know how to close. but i wont be replying after this. newaay. msg me if u wanna chat

Pheonyxx -> RE: Why? (5/13/2007 6:18:30 PM)
I saw a show on Discovery health about just that condition. Chimerism (in which the host person actually carries around the DNA of an absorbed twin from in utero). I can only imagine what these poor people are put through.

HutchGarahl -> RE: Why? (5/13/2007 6:29:44 PM)
Sorry if it seemed I was saying your were whining...sometimes my wording don't come out the way I want it. Yes, I have seen to many whine posts, in fact just left one when I came across your post, so I just automatically assumed it for whining. My apologies. But your right...you make a valid point with all the fakes. And I agree. But not having a camera or cam doesn't make you fake. And just because someone has a cam, doesn't really mean it's really them in the shot. Take my pic for instance...just looking at it, if you've never met me before, you have no idea if it's really me or not. I promise it is me, but you see the point. If you don't feel comfortable with putting your face on the net, don't. If someone wants to call you fake because of it, let them. Have enough pride in yourself to know the truth, don't let them get you down and continue with your search. Just stick to your guns sweety, i'm sure you'll find the right mistress. :) Good luck to ya.

chgosubmale -> RE: Why? (5/13/2007 8:36:36 PM)
Forget pictures for a moment, which anyone can fake. But kittiekat, your profile contains zero personal information about you other than your age, location, etc. You don't list any interests. You don't have any text talking about what you are looking for and just as important, what you are not looking for. This makes it difficult to say the least for the real serious submissives to figure out if you are someone they should respond to.

LadyPact -> RE: Why? (5/14/2007 5:42:09 AM)
Well, it was asked, so whether the OP is still reading the thread or not, I don't know. Since I'm a huge advocate of cam (the g-rated kind), I'll go ahead and play devil's advocate anyway. I think I've said this a time or two on prior similar threads. Cam is a great way to at least get a hint (I'm not getting into the debate of whether or not it's foolproof) that the person on the other end of the screen has represented themselves in a truthful manner. We've all heard the stories, or had the personal experience, of people who haven't exactly been genuine. Different gender, age, weight, etc. than what they list themselves as in their profile or during chat. It may sound harsh, but why do I want to waste My time if someone isn't what I'm looking for? Cam is a great way for Me to verify that I'm interested in a r/t meeting. Before the electronic age, in general, you got to look at a person and decide if you were attracted to them before deciding if you wanted to see them on a private level. Otherwise, it was just a blind date, and W/we all know the reputation for disaster those could be. If you don't want to show your face on cam, nobody's forcing it, but you have to remember that some have no problem with it. I'm more willing to invest My time on someone who can validate who they say they are.

MstrssPassion -> RE: Why? (5/14/2007 6:08:40 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: kittiekatt Why are submissives and slaves always accused of being fakes, and Mistress's and Dommes are immune to it? It's not fair. Dominant women are immune to it? Where are you reading? I think that "fake female dominant threads" having a higher rate of being posted about status the ones of people whining about not getting replies.... but then again, most think that no reply equals fake. I've seen far less fake sub posts lately.

kittiekatt -> RE: Why? (5/14/2007 12:00:29 PM)
Just because I don't update my profile doesn't mean I have a lack of interest or dedication, it just means I don't feel like doing it.

minnetar -> RE: Why? (5/14/2007 5:13:43 PM)
they might be concerned about your gender - i am not sure. If so, then why not offer to call even though no webcam. minnetar

GoddessDustyGold -> RE: Why? (5/14/2007 7:46:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: kittiekatt Just because I don't update my profile doesn't mean I have a lack of interest or dedication, it just means *I don't feel like doing it.* I often think that not feeling like doing something usually indicates a lack of interest and/or dedication. Time has shown Me that this attitude will permeate the relationsip and the submission also comes only when you feel like doing it. Just another point of view to think about.

kittiekatt -> RE: Why? (5/15/2007 4:02:13 PM)
just because im not dedicated to fill out my profile.. does NOT mean i am not dedicated in other aspects of my life. Dont be judgemental

YesMistressIrish -> RE: Why? (5/15/2007 4:40:40 PM)
With 89,000 male nigerian scammer sitting in boiler rooms in Nigera, and a lot of them pretending to be sweet women... Well, add in all the other fear-factors/been burned 2 many times on the internet and trust does need to be earned, on both sides of the whip. A camera and or a web cam are very inexpensive and can save a lot of time that might otherwise be wasted. Life is too short , too fleeting to waste. And, whatever *works for you. Is it working?

boundfem -> RE: Why? (5/15/2007 7:18:52 PM)
In my opinion, the ones who demand webcam are the fakes. They just want to get you to webcam and are not truly seeking a slave/sub. That has been my experience anyway. Realistically, not everyone has a damn webcam, not everyone wants to put themselves out there for strangers on the internet. And, someone seeking a real relationship in real life would not want to be bothered with such things.. they'd want to get to know you a bit by email, they would want to voice verify on the phone to know you are who you say you are and then they'd want to meet. Webcam demands to me mean not real. If there is a person out there who is reading this who is real and does request/require webcamming from prospectives, I apologize to you, but I am speaking in generalities. You are doing nothing wrong KittieKatt... I agree with you 100%.

LadyPact -> RE: Why? (5/15/2007 7:34:26 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: boundfem In my opinion, the ones who demand webcam are the fakes. They just want to get you to webcam and are not truly seeking a slave/sub. That has been my experience anyway. Realistically, not everyone has a damn webcam, not everyone wants to put themselves out there for strangers on the internet. And, someone seeking a real relationship in real life would not want to be bothered with such things.. they'd want to get to know you a bit by email, they would want to voice verify on the phone to know you are who you say you are and then they'd want to meet. Webcam demands to me mean not real. If there is a person out there who is reading this who is real and does request/require webcamming from prospectives, I apologize to you, but I am speaking in generalities. You are doing nothing wrong KittieKatt... I agree with you 100%. Glad you let us all know that last part about those of us who are real who prefer to see a face on cam. Was thinking there for a moment you might think I was made of plastic.

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.0625