WhiplashSmile
Posts: 1472
Joined: 6/8/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LuckyAlbatross They seem to be functioning just fine as it is. If the energy pushed them to change, it would be good to be open to it, but otherwise, what's the prob? I do find it distasteful when people hink ALL relationships MUST be based on some authority transfer dynamic, or that it somehow can make it all good and shiny again. I have to agree with LA on this one. That people should not feel that ALL relationship must have authority tranfer dynamic or a high level of D/s involved. I personaly had an excellent relationship once with a D/D dyanamic going on. If anything there was a mutal level of PPE that involved Deferment instead of submission. This did not make me any less of the person I am, I did not make me any less Dom. The thing is why try to mess with the dynamics of an established working relationship to begin with, and what is to be gained or lost in doing so? Too many people place a great emphasis on D/s relationship dynamics as the defining living proof to their domly or submissive personalities. There are Dom Couples and Hell even submissive couples. I myself don't fully understand the dyanamics of submissive couples, however I have to acknowledge that such relationships exist. I know more about D/D with PPE defermenet, D/s with PPE (partial power exchanges) involving submission. I had one relationship that was M/s with submission TPE. I have even had vanilla based relationships with BDSM kink that were fuzzy regarding power exchange too... I've had good mix between long term and short term relationships. So based on my own experiences, I have to totally side with LA's comment "I do find it distasteful when people hink ALL relationships MUST be based on some authority transfer dynamic, or that it somehow can make it all good and shiny again."
< Message edited by WhiplashSmile -- 5/18/2007 10:56:37 AM >
|