RE: Just wondering... Why can some women show their tits on CM and others cannot?

RE: Just wondering... Why can some women show their tits on CM and others cannot? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

slaverosebeauty -> RE: Just wondering... Why can some women show their tits on CM and others cannot? (5/21/2007 10:28:14 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: selfbnd411 Breasts are evil, dirty, and disgusting. Speak for yourself, I LOVE my breasts. Large nipples, sucullent breasts, soft sensative. Check my referances. :-)

chrissyslave -> RE: Just wondering... Why can some women show their tits on CM and others cannot? (5/21/2007 11:10:45 AM)
Perhaps it's more the degree of sexual suggestiveness of the photo that influences whether a breast/nip pic gets approved? And just how much of the nipple must show to cross that photo approval line (some of the aureola.... or the nipple it's self?). Of course this one would never dream of showing off such personal assets when we're all here mostly just for for the mental D/s aspects.....smiph!... gigs! and snickers! But in all honesty I suspect that the key focus is whether the profile mods wish this public site to attract profile viewers more for the sake of true interest in the individuals, or more as a supply of wank material for HNGs, and in the end that criteria determines the "appropriateness" of either the degree of nudity, or the extent of bondage scene photos. BTW, I have had my current profile photo approved both times I have put it up (the first time I deleted it as perhaps too suggestive...being the "nice" girl that I am when I got a bit of cold feet) when I wondered "would they be more attracted to my mind or my body/breasts?...even if mostly coverly my nips. However, have found that the best ones want both! Regarding Shylah's personal photo hanging upside down reference, repeated below, it really doesn't seem extreme in any bondage way, or sexual, and wonder if she ever tried to get it approved on CM? If not then why not at least run it through the approval mill and see what happens? Could just be "hanging around" with friends shot... snicks! Shylah - I also want to know the reasions behind the no bondage pics rule?.... We're kinky people... why can't I show a pic of my self being suspended upside down? (I'm fully clothed in the pic) See: http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a202/psyche247/g2_20060527_215010.gif Also Shylahgirl wrote: Personally if I were to look at tits I'd like to see perky good sized ones on a young thin woman. Well now!, what about perkey good sized ones on a thin but younger "looking" woman...regardless of age? Shushhhh!...[;)] But at least my upper body bikini swimsuit shot indicates that! And have some more "personal" ones that show that more fully...now if they would allow full shots...maybe worth another test? And lastly, the typical breasts/nip shots I have seen in profiles....I wish I didn't see...as in "if that's your best shot then....??"...yikes! chrissy-slave girl

NakedOnMyChain -> RE: Just wondering... Why can some women show their tits on CM and others cannot? (5/21/2007 11:21:17 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: domiguy quote: ORIGINAL: NakedOnMyChain Maybe they have to be really good looking tits. Nah, I know that's not true. When you make this type of post it is only a natural response to the reader that in your profile you are going to at least provide a shot or two of some saggy, malformed tits....Very disappointing. I can always rely on you to be there with some pat response about wanting to see me nude. This is, what, the third or fourth in this series? [:D] I love it! But my malformed boobies are beside the point, I meant that I knew they didn't approve breast pics for sheer beauty because I've seen some rather ogerous ones on others' profiles.

selfbnd411 -> RE: Just wondering... Why can some women show their tits on CM and others cannot? (5/21/2007 11:22:32 AM)
You can thank the Big Brother Morality Police and the Republican Party for this one: FBI agents paid to surf for deviant Internet porn By Ryan Paul \| Published: September 23, 2005 - 07:20PM CT http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20050923-5346.html Last month, the FBI began implementation of an anti-obscenity initiative designed to crack down on those that produce and distribute deviant pornography. According to FBI headquarters, the war against smut is "one of the top priorities" of Attorney General Gonazalez and FBI Director Robert Meuller. Although law enforcement agencies have always been aggressive when it comes to prosecuting exploitative child pornographers, this new initiative is unique in that it targets Internet pornography featuring consenting adults. According to the Washington Post, the new anti-obscenity squad, which will consist of eight agents, a supervisor, and assorted staff, will be responsible for accumulating evidence to use against those that produce and distribute criminally obscene content. So what constitutes criminal obscenity, and how does that relate to our first amendment rights? Under current American law, the Miller test is the means by which the courts determine if content is obscene and consequently not eligible for first amendment protection. The Miller test evaluates the literary, artistic, political, and scientific value of content as well as contemporary community standards. If content or expression is well within accepted community standards or it has intrinsic value, it does not constitute criminal obscenity. According to an electronic memo from FBI headquarters, established legal precedents indicate that conviction is most likely in cases where the content "includes bestiality, urination, defecation, as well as sadistic and masochistic behavior."

NakedOnMyChain -> RE: Just wondering... Why can some women show their tits on CM and others cannot? (5/21/2007 11:24:47 AM)
I've seen several full-on breast shots that showed the entire upper half of a naked female on this site. Apparently you can show the whole shebang, from the waist up.

LaTigresse -> RE: Just wondering... Why can some women show their tits on CM and others cannot? (5/21/2007 11:26:01 AM)
ACTually, it was just to annoy people trying to post nekked booby pictures........gives em something to create threads and whine about.

ennaozzie -> RE: Just wondering... Why can some women show their tits on CM and others cannot? (5/26/2007 10:58:04 PM)
I did have two other tit shots I put up here and about a week later took the one approved down again for personal reasons, but one was with my touching them and that was stopped from going up but the other was just me standing there leaning towards my cam, topless that was approved, so maybe if you are actually touching yourself is the reason it was not approved I don’t know as I have not seen the pics you talk about but that is what happened to me. beanie

kc692 -> RE: Just wondering... Why can some women show their tits on CM and others cannot? (5/26/2007 11:00:51 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy On of my friends here told me the mods rejected her tit shot. Now I could list 20 sn off the top of my head with bare breasts on collarme so what is the deal? Did she also tell you that was the reason it got axed? They do mail a reason yanno. What was the reason given? I'm betting it wasn't tit shot.

kc692 -> RE: Just wondering... Why can some womenw their tits on CM and others cannot? (5/26/2007 11:02:59 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BOUNTYHUNTER I am wondering the same damm thing,I have tried to post pics of my girls bare breast and keep getting them rejected,I guess it who you know,,bounty What was the reason given to you?

justplainjava -> RE: Just wondering... Why can some womenw their tits on CM and others cannot? (5/26/2007 11:08:41 PM)
Greetings and i have the same question for my profile i wanted to post a picture of my back the upper part not even the lower part, for my ex master drew a pretty unicorn on my back with shapries and i was inform that it was inapportate a unicorn painted on someone's back inapportante go fig take care and be safe plain old java property and slave to no one

Lordandmaster -> RE: Just wondering... Why can some womenw their tits on CM and others cannot? (5/26/2007 11:12:02 PM)
I wanted to post a picture of my trunk and tusks and the evil CM police nixed it. How unfair!

kc692 -> RE: Just wondering... Why can some women show their tits on CM and others cannot? (5/26/2007 11:12:11 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Shylahgirl quote: ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy On of my friends here told me the mods rejected her tit shot. Now I could list 20 sn off the top of my head with bare breasts on collarme so what is the deal? Good question... My semi-nude picks were rejected too and you couldn't even see niple. The funny thing is that it was excepted the week before, then I photo shopped the eyes and it got rejected, all I did was add colored eyes to a BW photo of my self. Shylah Ok, same question to you, what was the reason given? Was it your tits or your eyes? Surely, if the they(tits) were accepted the first time, and the only thing you changed was your eyes, maybe you changing the format of your picture had something to do with that. Just a thought.....

kc692 -> RE: Just wondering... Why can some women show their tits on CM and others cannot? (5/26/2007 11:15:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: slaverosebeauty quote: ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth I'm assuming that Mod 11 would just quote the rules: No commercial photos or artwork - Only pictures you took yourself No extreme or vulgar pictures No objects or places for your primary photo No explicit genital nudity or hardcore bondage Persons who appear underage will be asked to furnish proof of age "Extreme" and "Vulgar" are qualitative and subjective. I would think that in the minds of some, any bondage could be considered "hardcore". Adding to the redundancy - Its a free site... However, in an effort to help out. I will make myself, my hands in particular, available to anyone wishing to duplicate our icon and main profile picture. The timing is right - I just spent yesterday by the pool working to regain my tan. Always the Gentleman aren't you, Merc. Always offerign a helping hand, or two. My main pic on myspace is a pic with me on my knees and my hands covering my breasts; no complaints from anyone on there [if you are curious as to the pic, go to www.myspace.com/rose_beauty its my main pic]; and that's a VANILLA site. Maybe I should try submitting that pic, any bets it will NOT be approved on here?! Isn't that the fourth picture on your profile? You are in water, but you ARE your knees, and you are cupping your breasts.....what was the bet for?

Lordandmaster -> RE: Just wondering... Why can some women show their tits on CM and others cannot? (5/26/2007 11:18:15 PM)
Put her on the wheel! quote: ORIGINAL: kc692 what was the bet for?

kc692 -> RE: Just wondering... Why can some women show their tits on CM and others cannot? (5/26/2007 11:23:38 PM)
Just wondering when she's going to answer, I think it's TOO funny it is already on her profile. My resizing sucks but you get the idea. edited to add: Here is some free publicity for you...so what was the bet for again? [Mod Note: image removed]

Pulpsmack -> RE: Just wondering... Why can some women show their tits on CM and others cannot? (5/27/2007 1:03:57 AM)
At the risk of an interragatory from the Gestapo, I find the whole Mod censors to be arbitrary fools (Note: I feel the mods here in chat have been fair, I am referring specifically to those who evaluate content). I had a handful of demonstration pictures that were submitted and approved a long time ago. I removed all pictures for the purposes of reorganization and upon resubmission, these very same approved pictures were denied. One that I recall was of me raising a ball of fire aloft, and another was of me hanging upside down off of some suspension rig chain I set up. NONE of them were acts of bondage. NONE of them depicted others. It was clear from my profile (heterosexual male) that these could not be look-alike male submissives or anything of the kind. The latter picture was as harmless as an unmentionable doing an upside down dangle from the monkey bars. In fact, I contend that if it were a pic in the park of me on monkey bars the geniuses would have had no problem at all. Since it's an "evil" chain it's got to be a bondage action shot. Pure stupidity, plain and simple.

Quivver -> RE: Just wondering... Why can some women show their tits on CM and others cannot? (5/27/2007 2:06:32 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Shylahgirl (I'm fully clothed in the pic) See: http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a202/psyche247/g2_20060527_215010.gif Shylah Great Pic!! I'm Jealous............... [8D] Oh that's right, were talking Tits here. In in the past I did have one shot that if you looked hard enough the puppies showed through my hair. I took it, and any other pic's off my profile cause the fish they caught were carp. I'd rather bait more privatly. [;)]

FatDomDaddy -> RE: Just wondering... Why can some women show their tits on CM and others cannot? (5/27/2007 4:53:32 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: kc692 Did she also tell you that was the reason it got axed? They do mail a reason yanno. What was the reason given? I'm betting it wasn't tit shot. Several women have confimed the have tried to place shots of their naked breasts and have been turned down and still you challenge them. Why? As I said before, surf around and you can find plenty of nipple shots on CM.

mnottertail -> RE: Just wondering... Why can some women show their tits on CM and others cannot? (5/27/2007 5:08:01 AM)
I know a little bit about the pics game here from snooping around, and first let me say that the major difficulties of the approval have to do with the fact that it is rather motile right at this time, based on current understandings and interpretations of the shit going on with your friendly ass sniffing government. Now CM (among the sites) is a free service and as such doesn't have the available cash or other werewithal to sit in the fuckin' lawyers office all day. So they take a rather conservative view of acceptability. Now I think also, that there is no comprehensive manifesto spelled out on acceptability because 1. volunteers do this and have limits to the time they can spend and 2. acceptability is changing rapidly--- 'cause you people couldn't post alot of this shit on here last year, to say nothing of the year before--- But fundamentally, WTF? Howling constantly that you are trolled and wasting the board with all this effete snobbery about how put upon because you play into the trolling and how de riguer this shit is----- Some of you folks need to SHIT or SHUT the fuck up and suck it up. I for one, would rather have Mod11 or one of the picture police here knocking on my door one bright and shiny sunday morning in their dress than I would J. Edgar Hoover in his. Ron

DesertRat -> RE: Just wondering... Why can some women show their tits on CM and others cannot? (5/27/2007 5:30:01 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail I for one, would rather have Mod11 or one of the picture police here knocking on my door one bright and shiny sunday morning in their dress than I would J. Edgar Hoover in his. Sure, but what if the Hoove was in his very best black lace panties, with black stockings, a garter belt, and a push-up bra? Bob

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875