quote:

For those of you that enjoy humiliation play (on the dom side), do you find that you get your rush from the sub being uncomfortable about it -- so regardless of how extreme it is, you enjoy it? Or, do you crave an intensity of acts, so to speak, and the more the sub can take, the more you enjoy it -- even if the sub is totally getting off on it?

quote:

For those of you that enjoy humiliation play (on the dom side), do you find that you get your rush from the sub being uncomfortable about it -- so regardless of how extreme it is, you enjoy it? Or, do you crave an intensity of acts, so to speak, and the more the sub can take, the more you enjoy it -- even if the sub is totally getting off on it?

quote:

The challenge comes when I meet a submissive who is "shameless" -- that's the best word I can come up with. There's pretty much nothing he won't do, and the more humiliating the better. Because the more humiliating it is, the more he loves it!

quote:

For those of you that enjoy humiliation play (on the dom side), do you find that you get your rush from the sub being uncomfortable about it -- so regardless of how extreme it is, you enjoy it? Or, do you crave an intensity of acts, so to speak, and the more the sub can take, the more you enjoy it -- even if the sub is totally getting off on it?

quote:

ORIGINAL: SirSTRYKER
I know she hated doing this for real and would much rather have the door closed so her subordinates would remain clueless, but that would have removed the fun of it from Me.

quote:

Perhaps that was part of the entire humiliation, perhaps there were back-up plans in place that would supplement and her career position was merely something for her to do. I just am not seeing the benefits of mixing the two here, other than a quick cheap thrill with a lot of long term bad consequences.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

Emerald Slave 2 - I mean no offense to you in particular. This "rant" isn't directed at your specific "worst case". It just seems more often than not lately, every thread where people are responding anecdotally someone points out how they didn't consider all the ramifications of their activity.

In this case, I guess Sir Stryker should have added to his post. Warning - Getting caught masturbating at your desk by your co-workers may be have a negative effect on your career.

quote:

After all there are doms who consider their slaves insolent because they say they won't run down the street naked when asked the question "as a test of their submission."

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

quote:

Perhaps that was part of the entire humiliation, perhaps there were back-up plans in place that would supplement and her career position was merely something for her to do. I just am not seeing the benefits of mixing the two here, other than a quick cheap thrill with a lot of long term bad consequences.

Emerald Slave 2 - I mean no offense to you in particular. This "rant" isn't directed at your specific "worst case". It just seems more often than not lately, every thread where people are responding anecdotally someone points out how they didn't consider all the ramifications of their activity. I think most people do consider them, they just wanted to make a short point of reference. Usually it's one minor detail or aspect unrelated to the point of the story or the thread topic.

A post could have one innocent sentence such as; "I walked across the street to go to grocery store", and if people wanted to they could post worst cases like...

"You didn't mention that you crossed at the corner and you should only cross when you have a green light or at a cross walk."
Or, better yet...
"You know, they sell beer cigarettes at some grocery stores, and you should warn people that if they take young children they may see someone buy them and wonder what they taste like."

Is it necessary to invoke a "worst case scenario" clause to every anecdotal post? Hell, at any moment of the day a person can walk by my office and see a "strained expression" on my face and there is no masturbation going on - well rarely anyway. ("Worst Case Clause - HUMOR ! (Not the "strained expression" part but the rare masturbation reference.) The using of mental powers is important and fun, and 99% of mental humiliation play is only between the players. Their mind creates the 'worst case' scenario and its a factor to the physical excitement.

When a lifestyle couple is in public, no one knows if the sub isn't wearing underwear. There is no sign around her neck indicating she may be wearing remote controlled vibrating panties or a butt plug. Is that a collar around her/his neck or just a funky necklace? Even an aforementioned thread referencing public peeing; if an adult diaper were worn - who would know?

But I guess we are living in an age that we need to publish the "worst case" scenario. They are all around us. Maybe expecting common sense is too much to ask. After all we need signs and warnings all around us because common sense has become endangered. You know the ones....

Warning - This plastic bag is NOT a toy and may cause suffocation.
Warning - This coffee is HOT.
Warning - If a child falls into a bucket filled with water they could drown. As a parent please watch your child. (btw - who is that warning directed to? The adult, who never thought of that or the toddler who can't read?)
Warning - DO NOT USE a hair dryer in the tub. (Wondering when the same warning will soon be on a toaster.)
Warning - Cigarettes cause cancer.

In anticipation of heading to Vegas Thursday, I want to point out to all the people planning to be in attendance there is NO warning on the observation/ride level of the Tower. Maybe we should suggest one. How about this:
Warning - Jumping or falling from this tower will result in hitting the ground at a high speed normally associated with severe physical trauma which often leads to death.

In this case, I guess Sir Stryker should have added to his post. Warning - Getting caught masturbating at your desk by your co-workers may be have a negative effect on your career.

quote:

ORIGINAL: EmeraldSlave2

quote:

ORIGINAL: SirSTRYKER
I know she hated doing this for real and would much rather have the door closed so her subordinates would remain clueless, but that would have removed the fun of it from Me.

As a humiliation slut I can enjoy that aspect of this, but what about the other side effects? The loss of respect and authority from subordinates? The distraction from work and effectiveness? Possible client issues?

Perhaps that was part of the entire humiliation, perhaps there were back-up plans in place that would supplement and her career position was merely something for her to do. I just am not seeing the benefits of mixing the two here, other than a quick cheap thrill with a lot of long term bad consequences.