China Developing Long-Range Nuclear Missiles (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


cyberdude611 -> China Developing Long-Range Nuclear Missiles (5/24/2007 5:47:49 PM)

US fears over China long-range missiles
By Demetri Sevastopulo in Washington and Mure Dickie in Beijing

Published: May 24 2007 21:13 | Last updated: May 25 2007 00:15

The US is increasingly concerned about China’s deployment of mobile land and sea-based ballistic nuclear missiles that have the range to hit the US, according to people familiar with an imminent Pentagon report on China’s military.

The 2007 Pentagon China military power report will highlight the surprising pace of development of a new Jin-class submarine equipped to carry a nuclear ballistic missile with a range of more than 5,000 miles.

Washington is also concerned about the strategic implications of China’s preparations later this year to start deploying a new mobile, land-based DF-31A intercontinental ballistic missile that could target the whole US.

Robert Gates, US defence secretary, on Thursday said the report would not exaggerate the threat posed by China. “It paints a picture of a country that is devoting substantial resources to the military and developing...some very sophisticated capabilities.”

The report also outlines concerns about the build-up of missiles across the Taiwan Strait, China’s recent anti-satellite missile test and its development of technologies to deny access in space.

Beijing has strongly criticised previous Pentagon reports on the Chinese military, which it sees as portraying China as a cold war-style enemy, and points out that the Chinese military budget is a fraction of US defence spending.

US experts on the Chinese military have been surprised by the pace of development of the nuclear forces, and particularly the Jin programme. The Pentagon believes that China is developing five Jin submarines. One is already being tested at sea and could become operational next year.

“The Chinese have maintained that they have a ‘no first use’ policy [for nuclear weapons] and that they have a minimal deterrent policy, which means they have only enough nuclear capability to retaliate,” said Michael Green, former White House senior Asia adviser to President George W. Bush.

“But open source journals and discussions and their own modernisation suggest that they are possibly developing capabilities for a more flexible use of nuclear weapons, and survivability and tactical uses that would call into question this declared policy.”

In 2005, Chinese General Zhu Chenghu fuelled US concerns that China might be changing its strategic stance when he told journalists that it might have to use nuclear weapons against the US if attacked during a confrontation over Taiwan. Chinese officials later restated the country’s “no first use” policy and have privately played down Gen Zhu’s influence.

Some analysts have also suggested that the Chinese move could be partly in response to US plans to develop a ballistic missile defence system.

Russia has recently raised concerns about plans by the US to place missile interceptors in Europe.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/1e81fc48-0a24-11dc-93ae-000b5df10621.html




Sinergy -> RE: China Developing Long-Range Nuclear Missiles (5/24/2007 6:21:23 PM)

 
China does things in China's own best interest.

They are ramping up their military capability because they saw how effective the United States military was in destroying Saddam's million man army.

I dont blame them, actually.

It has been pointed out on other threads that it is not in China's best interest to go to war with the US, or to even get removed from most favored trade nation status.  China's best interest is in fleecing the United States economically.

There must be an election or a major scandal to hide emerging from the Bush administration for them to be releasing this information. 

Sinergy




cyberdude611 -> RE: China Developing Long-Range Nuclear Missiles (5/24/2007 6:44:13 PM)

The only one that knows what China is doing is China. However, their moves still remain quite consistant with reuniting Taiwan with mainland China. The recent moves made by the Chinese military seem to be geared more towards intimidation. They are trying to flex their muscles in front of the US to try to discourage any American interference in the Taiwan-Chinese issue.

China has been on this path since 1994 when President Clinton made a promise to Taiwan that if China attacked, the US would come to the defense of the island democracy. That infuriated the radical political wings in China. And their military took a turn more towards countering the US.

So I still think Taiwan is the motivating issue with China. I dont think Iraq has really anything to do with it. Sure Saddam was a buyer of Chinese weapons, but there is no shortage of buyers in the world. It is Russia that is more pissed about the US invasion of Iraq specifically because of the billions of dollars that the Saddam regime owed Russia in order for Saddam to build his "million-man army."




farglebargle -> RE: China Developing Long-Range Nuclear Missiles (5/24/2007 8:31:14 PM)

I wonder how the Rooskies feel about all this?





iwannapullurhair -> RE: China Developing Long-Range Nuclear Missiles (5/24/2007 10:01:41 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

I wonder how the Rooskies feel about all this?




Probably jealous-they want to make America feel threatened again too.




cyberdude611 -> RE: China Developing Long-Range Nuclear Missiles (5/24/2007 11:29:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

I wonder how the Rooskies feel about all this?




I think Russia is a bit too busy with the war of words with the EU right now to be too concerned about US-China relations. Germany a few weeks ago blasted Russia's human rights record. And Putin claims to be "insulted." The EU is after Putin because they think he is modeling the government so that he and his party will still have power and influence even after he is forced by the constitution to step down in March next year.




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
3.320313E-02