sublimelysensual -> RE: Public undressing of sub females (5/30/2007 8:26:03 PM)
|
Just to play devil's advocate here, (and yes, I have a um).. how many have never taken their child to a pool / beach / waterpark / amusement park? There's a lot more skin exposed at any of those places than what it sounds like was exposed at the park, and all of those places are public as well. It could be argued that at those places, there's a reasonable expectation of exposed skin, but come on now, we're not living in a country where women walk around with all parts of their bodies covered at all times. I would venture a guess that you could walk into quite a few public schools and see just as much skin exposed as well. Does that make it right? Not necessarily, but children are going to be exposed to scantily clad people in life. If the woman had been completely nude under the shirt or skirt, yes, I would have a problem with it, but my experience has been that most (not all, i don't do generalization well).. people into that type of play are VERY aware of what's going on around them exactly because of that kind of scenario (um's, etc), and take great care not to "corrupt" anyone or cause anyone else discomfort. As for the "sexuality" involved, again, go ride on a schoolbus or look down a school hallway, and you may get a shock. Your um's have already more than likely been exposed to much worse unless A. you keep them locked in a closet.. or B. they're too young to understand what's going on anyway. Just my two cents.. -a
|
|
|
|