addicted2it -> RE: "Gift of Submission" (6/10/2007 8:13:20 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: VeryMercurial quote:
ORIGINAL: littlespicyone I've always thought of my submission as a gift ... as is something I'm good at. I've also spoken about submission as a gift because in taking a collar I GIVE myself and power over me to the Dom. All semantics aside, I've given something precious to abother person and so it is a gift. I don't do it for gratitude and I don't do it so I can have power over someone else ... if I wanted power I'd be a Dom, right? Mostly, though, I use the term because it's "Lifestyle speak" for just because you have a dick doesn't mean I'm going to submit to you. I also think it conveys my need for an intimate relationship and not just a no-strings, kinky sex thing. Just because I have the need to submit and someone else has the need to dominate, doesn't make the giving of oneself and one's choices any less special or important, if that were the case then what would be the point of developing a D/s relationship? If all it consists of is two people's needs for dominance or submission being met, then we could all just pick someone up at the bar and dominate/submit to her/him. I think it also emphasises that giving myself is something that I don't do lightly and it lets the Dom know that I do expect to be taken care of ... the way anyone would take care of a special gift that s/he'd been given. My mom gave me a ring ... she did it because she knew I would like it and wanted me to have it. It's a special gift and I take very good care of it. That's the kind of feeling I want to convey when I use the phrase in question. Lastly, it emphasizes in my mind that I am His. You don't give someone a gift and then take it back just because you feel like it. By giving the gift of myself, I've trusted Him with everything that I am and have and that's important to me. It often seems to me that the men who use the term "gift of submission" tend to use it to really mean "gift of yourself" which is how I see it. I can give submission to anyone, and do on a regular basis -- at work, at school, at home, at church -- but I don't give myself to just anyone. The men who don't really see it as a gift or as anything but a right granted to them by nature and the fact that they have a penis are the men I want to avoid ... and I do so by using the gift terminology. Well stated littlespicyone, real submission to me can be called a gift. A special gift that is to be treasured. I have no problem calling it a gift, and cherishing the gift when I am given it. IMO, the submission that you appreciate and adhere to appears to have a very strong love component, and there is a gap or misunderstanding when attempting to define whether or not submission is a gift. If the submission originates from a completely unselfish motive, maybe you can say that it IS a gift. OTOH, if the submission is based upon reciprocation, then it is definately NOT a gift, but a contract between two individuals who have agreed to give and recieve satisfaction from the personal interaction that they are involved in. I hate having to classify this definition as "legalese," but specifics are very often required when explaining the very intricate details that comprise very delicate and controversial subject matter. For those of us who understand topping and bottoming, that situation is primarily based upon the administering of pain and the receiving of pain; and from my understanding, there is no submission involved, other than the willingness of the bottom to accept the pain and the desire of the top to administer that pain. WIth a Dom/Domme, submissive/slave interaction, there very well could be, and often is, a love component involved. And who are we to define what love is or is not? Most of us understand that there are many forms and definitions of love. And with that in mind, does a slave NOT love his or her Mistress? Of course, each situation is different, but there is usually some facit of love which may or may not develop over the course of time and with the close and personal interaction between Master or Mistress and slave. Again, 2 cents worth.
|
|
|
|