RE: Studes Say Death Penalty Deters Crime (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


Alumbrado -> RE: Studes Say Death Penalty Deters Crime (6/13/2007 10:09:19 AM)

quote:

......the thing about the death penalty is that, by its unique and extreme nature, it tends to polarise thinking about it. However, to my mind, the judicial system is one of those things that ought to be led by a sense of ethics and morality before cash concerns.


Of course, that's why it makes such a good hot button issue for political platforms.

And I would love to see a CJ system, or even some of its components, where ethics outweighed cash concerns.

But in the current reality, we are dealing with greed, powerlust, egos, political ambitions, fear mongering and bigotry as primary motivators... and money becomes of practical concern in figuring out how to improve things.




philosophy -> RE: Studes Say Death Penalty Deters Crime (6/13/2007 10:16:46 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

.......But in the current reality, we are dealing with greed, powerlust, egos, political ambitions, fear mongering and bigotry as primary motivators... and money becomes of practical concern in figuring out how to improve things.


...can't argue with your pragmatism there. However, i've always felt that to really address such issues as this we need both pragmatists and idealists. The former to address things as they stand, the latter to change just where it is we stand. They make a good team.




Alumbrado -> RE: Studes Say Death Penalty Deters Crime (6/13/2007 10:28:22 AM)

Yep.. I try to find such teams and lend a hand when I can.




stella40 -> RE: Studes Say Death Penalty Deters Crime (6/13/2007 10:29:53 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: selfbnd411

quote:

ORIGINAL: stella40
Nice try though, and I guess it sure looked pretty.


I hasten to add that I used the numbers given to me by a prior anti-death penalty poster. Numbers that came from an anti-death penalty website, btw.

Nice try though.



Okay... So what exactly are the facts behind your figures?

You say, for example that the average amount of time spent on Death Row is 17.5 years.

Is this figure for prisoners incarcerated under sentence of death only, or does this figure also include those prisoners who are under sentence of death but who are also serving life sentences? As an example off the top of my head I give you the name of Christa Pike in Tennessee who is under sentence of death for the 1995 (I think) murder of Colleen Slemmer but who later murdered an inmate and received a life sentence.

Are you also counting Death Row prisoners in states where there is currently a moratorium in place? States such as Illinois, New York and Georgia?

As far as I'm aware, the longest serving inmate on Death Row is Mumia Al-Jamal in Philadelphia, 27 years if I'm correct.

I would agree if you were to say the average length of time prisoners as a whole is increasing. In the period 1977 to 1983 it was 4 years, and it increased steadily to 1996 to 12 years. In 1997 it fell to just over 10 years and has since wavered between 10 and 12 years (I'm using US Bureau of Justice statistics here).

In states which routinely carry out executions such as Texas (the leading executioner in the US) and Virginia (which executes more people 'per capita' of its population than any other state) the time spent on Death Row rarely exceeds 12 years. But then you have states which rarely perform executions such as California, South Dakota, and Mississippi, where you might find inmates who have served over 20 years still awaiting execution on Death Row. However some of these states have large Death Row populations, such as California, and some don't, such as Mississippi and Delaware.

Therefore, on what factual basis do you arrive at the figure of 17.5 years?

Also to arrive at your assumed or (guesswork) figure as to the costs per year of keeping a prisoner on Death Row I am interested as to how you arrive at such figures.

I know that it costs $50 a day to house a prisoner on Death Row in Texas, Florida, Tennessee, Arizona, and a few other states. To arrive at your figures there would have to be states where it would cost anything up to $200 a day - I'm curious as to knowing which states exactly have these sort of costs.

Also your figures don't add up because it doesn't take into account the 'industry' aspect or even the 'business' aspect of the death penalty. And for a few the death penalty is big business.

Are you aware for example that each dose of Pavulon costs a state department of corrections an average of $86? We are talking about the exact same drug that vets use to put animals to sleep. But does it costs the vets $86?

Are you also aware that for many years one company held the monopoly for maintaining all execution equipment in the US and their instruction manuals formed the basis for execution protocols in many states? They maintained the gas chambers in Arizona, Mississippi and Maryland, all the electric chairs and even supplied the rope for the gallows in Delaware, Wyoming and Washington?

Then there is the example of the consultants who charged Florida Department of Corrections some $8,000 to examine the electric chair in Arkansas after the Pedro Medina execution (I'm citing here Moore vs. Provenzano from 2000 where Thomas Harrison Provenzano was challenging the constitutionality of electrocution under the Eighth Amendment claiming it was a 'cruel and unusual punishment'). In fighting this appeal Florida Department of Corrections commissioned a study of the execution protocol administered by the Georgia Department of Corrections.

I guess the anti-death penalty website you mentioned would be the Death Penalty Information Center, a site I know very well and which appears to be informative but can also be at times misleading and inaccurate. However I'm struggling to think of where on that site you could come up with the figures you mentioned without using a certain amount of imagination.

I base my arguments on solid facts, and not just on one site, there is also a very good pro-death penalty website with reliable information, Rick Halperin's websites, the NAACPD, Amnesty International, all the various state resources such as official department of correction websites, anti-DP sites, the US Bureau of Justice, and so on.

But maybe you have other sources - what are they?




Alumbrado -> RE: Studes Say Death Penalty Deters Crime (6/13/2007 10:36:28 AM)

Dayuuum.. someone who actually differentiates between the Texas execution rate, and the per capita rate.. And does their research on both sides of an issue...And asks pointed questions...




stella40 -> RE: Studes Say Death Penalty Deters Crime (6/13/2007 10:45:45 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: selfbnd411

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

He does not want to deal with the fact that his approach smacks of kill em all and let God sort them out mentality. His approach is a rubber stamp that shortens time to execution.. I would refer him to this site



I respected your right to believe what you feel. I challenge you to respect my right to believe what I think.


I'd be very very careful here. Your views are getting very similar to those of Heinrich Himmler which resulted in Operation Reinhard.





kittinSol -> RE: Studes Say Death Penalty Deters Crime (6/13/2007 10:56:46 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

quote:

So... I reiterate: you would die at the hands of the executioner with a smile on your face whilst being innocent of the crime you'd be accused of, because you would know you are dying for a worthy cause. Right?



I can't let that one go either... going to such an extreme and demanding that it be adopted by someone who is advocating a general position does little to advance a discussion.

If adherents of the death penalty have to embrace the worst case scenario above, shouldn't their opponents have to claim that they would enjoy being murdered by someone who  was released due to a lack of captial punishment option?

Or we could drop the extremes, and address the systemic problems that lead to death row, its shortcomings, and possible solutions.



Actually,  I think my question was perfectly legitimate. Advocates of the death penalty talk about how 'human error' is inevitable, and how it's an 'absolute necessity' that a small percentage of individuals will be executed whilst innocent. It is therefore reasonable to ask them whether they would find it acceptable to be on the other side of the executioner, so to speak, since one of their main arguments is of an emotionally charged nature ("What if YOUR mum/dad/child/best friend/therapist was brutally killed by an insane axe-murderer").

I think it does serve a purpose to confront some extremists with the downside of their conviction. It isn't I who is extreme here.




Alumbrado -> RE: Studes Say Death Penalty Deters Crime (6/13/2007 11:27:23 AM)

So the same question that is 'reasonable' for your side is 'extremist' when asked by 'them'?


Weeellll.. OK[8|]




RCdc -> RE: Studes Say Death Penalty Deters Crime (6/13/2007 11:36:23 AM)

Ok... gotta say it(coz I am in suck up mode[;)])
Personally thinking stella ROCKS!
 
Peace and back to the usual schedual...
the.dark.




Sinergy -> RE: Studes Say Death Penalty Deters Crime (6/13/2007 12:05:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

Actually,  I think my question was perfectly legitimate. Advocates of the death penalty talk about how 'human error' is inevitable, and how it's an 'absolute necessity' that a small percentage of individuals will be executed whilst innocent. It is therefore reasonable to ask them whether they would find it acceptable to be on the other side of the executioner, so to speak, since one of their main arguments is of an emotionally charged nature ("What if YOUR mum/dad/child/best friend/therapist was brutally killed by an insane axe-murderer").



What always amuses me is that advocates for the Death Penalty, when asked that question, generally respond with sturm und drang and accuse the questioner of asking an emotionally charged question.

I get emotionally charged by the idea that I could be that mistake.  I can understand their upset.

However, what they almost never do is just answer the question.  

Although sometimes they do, as TheHeretic did, answer the question without really realizing the fact that they were destroying their argument by answering it.

Sinergy

p.s.  I guess the point I keep making is that all these Death Penalty Advocates insist it is a wonderful thing, as long as it happens to somebody else.




selfbnd411 -> RE: Studes Say Death Penalty Deters Crime (6/13/2007 12:48:49 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

Too little, too late. You are the one who posted without backing it up, and producing the evidence after being called on your omission is your problem, not mine.


If you had bothered to click the link, you would have seen that there are 11 pages of posts in this thread.  I posted the link to page one because you clearly dove in to the discussion on page 9.

Please re-read all the posts, and your question will be answered.

Edit to add:
The same holds true for stella.  Read the thread.  From page one.




kittinSol -> RE: Studes Say Death Penalty Deters Crime (6/13/2007 12:51:08 PM)

That was my point exactly, a point Alumbrado didn't get, but I suspect it's because I didn't find the right words to express my extreme feelings of fear accurately [:D]




BOUNTYHUNTER -> RE: Studes Say Death Penalty Deters Crime (6/13/2007 12:56:02 PM)

Yeah sure,while hes pointing that gun to my head I can see the wheels turning as he is thinking will I fry if I shoot this white mother fucker...bounty




Sinergy -> RE: Studes Say Death Penalty Deters Crime (6/13/2007 1:06:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BOUNTYHUNTER

Yeah sure,while hes pointing that gun to my head I can see the wheels turning as he is thinking will I fry if I shoot this white mother fucker...bounty


I read somewhere that there was a correlation to murders increasing in California with the passage of the Three Strikes Law.

Apparently, a two-strikes felon will just kill the person they are robbing since the sentence will be the same.

Not sure what that has to do with the Death Penalty, but your comment BOUNTYHUNTER brought that memory up about criminals who premeditate what they are going to do.

Sinergy




Alumbrado -> RE: Studes Say Death Penalty Deters Crime (6/13/2007 1:07:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

That was my point exactly, a point Alumbrado didn't get, but I suspect it's because I didn't find the right words to express my extreme feelings of fear accurately [:D]



My post was not relevant to understanding your beliefs, it had to do with employing a logical fallacy in supporting them.

If I'm going to call selfbnd411 on it, why should I hold anyone else to a lesser standard? 




Alumbrado -> RE: Studes Say Death Penalty Deters Crime (6/13/2007 1:14:02 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: selfbnd411

If you had bothered to click the link, you would have seen that there are 11 pages of posts in this thread.  I posted the link to page one because you clearly dove in to the discussion on page 9.

Please re-read all the posts, and your question will be answered.

Edit to add:
The same holds true for stella.  Read the thread.  From page one.



There was no link to click, because you failed to provide one at the time of your claims.
Adding a bogus one later and accusing people of not reading it, while lying about when they joined the discussion,  crosses the line from sophistry to intellectual dishonesty.
( A line you have already crossed in this thread by fabricating claims which I never made, and attributing them to me).





domiguy -> RE: Studes Say Death Penalty Deters Crime (6/13/2007 1:26:58 PM)

If they didn't kill Susan Smith then no one should ever face the death penalty....It targets the poor and minorities of this land....Prosecutors as well as the police have committed crimes in trying to get a successful murder conviction....It serves no purpose....The innocent die.  Hmmmm. Were we just discussing abortion?




SugarMyChurro -> RE: Studes Say Death Penalty Deters Crime (6/13/2007 1:51:14 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado
If adherents of the death penalty have to embrace the worst case scenario above, shouldn't their opponents have to claim that they would enjoy being murdered by someone who  was released due to a lack of captial punishment option?

Or we could drop the extremes, and address the systemic problems that lead to death row, its shortcomings, and possible solutions.


Both extremes are very real and are caused by a refusal to correct problems in the underlying "appearance of justice" system the allows those situations to exist. It is the status quo mentality, that also happens to be a pro-death penalty mentality, that allows those extremes to continue. We simply aren't pursuing anything like real justice, we are satisfied with the mere appearance of justice that allows different politicians and police persons to look as if they are tough on crime while simultaneously allowing the guilty to go free and the innocent to suffer needlessly.

Is it well understood that the government has opposed DNA testing at almost all turns even though it potentially provides a far higher degree of certainty in resolving criminal cases? They don't care about adherence to the truth or justice, they just want a designated "guilty" person to fill a prison bed and provide them with cheap labor via prison work programs.

I laugh at TV shows like "CSI" - the clear purposes of which are to hand hold the population and coerce the belief that all criminal cases are taken very seriously and resolved with a near scientific degree of certainty over the question of guilt or innocence. Of course, such certainty couldn't be further from the truth. The government doesn't know if they got the right person and they don't want to know either.

So those worst case scenarios aren't as hypothetical as they might seem at first blush - they are instead the very real outcomes of a system such as ours.




Lordandmaster -> RE: Studes Say Death Penalty Deters Crime (6/13/2007 2:00:43 PM)

Let me get this straight.  A product at Walmart might cause an accidental death--therefore we should have a death penalty?

Wrongful death by execution isn't "an absolute necessity," no matter how many invalid comparisons you wish to make with space heaters at Walmart.  Want to get rid of wrongful death by execution?  It's easy.  Get rid of the death penalty.

quote:

ORIGINAL: NeedToUseYou

Your heaters they sell at Wal-Mart for example, some models come with two safety fuses some come with one, the consumer doesn't no the difference, so they buy a heater that is cheaper by 0.25. The manufacturer knows that a few of those single fuse heaters will end up not working right, and the fuse won't blow before catching fire. And they know it will eventually lead to someones death.

[snip]

Unfortunately in any real world system, a probability for wrongful death, is an absolute necessity.




Vendaval -> RE: Studes Say Death Penalty Deters Crime (6/13/2007 2:22:58 PM)

 [sm=applause.gif]   [sm=applause.gif]  [sm=applause.gif]


quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

.......But in the current reality, we are dealing with greed, powerlust, egos, political ambitions, fear mongering and bigotry as primary motivators... and money becomes of practical concern in figuring out how to improve things.


...can't argue with your pragmatism there. However, i've always felt that to really address such issues as this we need both pragmatists and idealists. The former to address things as they stand, the latter to change just where it is we stand. They make a good team.




Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.09375