RE: Courtly Love (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


thetammyjo -> RE: Courtly Love (6/11/2007 10:23:53 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Faramir

I can see it being a good model for a Female Dom/Male Sub with a chastity thing going on. He loves here in kneeling admiration, serves her, but she is unattainable, perhaps wed to another and thus he is denied consumation.


I can see it as this too.

Though I tend to see it as a strong, powerful man willingly bending to serve a woman who may or may not be attainable.




Emperor1956 -> RE: Courtly Love (6/11/2007 10:32:17 AM)

julia, I posted a fast reply.  You know (having been a long timer on CM) that it directs an FR to the immediately prior post.  I wasn't laughing at you, indeed I hadn't even read your post when I posted my note.  The "trigger" for my post, FWIW, was a leading exponent of Gorean theory around here posting how he learned his "chops" in Courtly Love by volunteering at Ren Faires.  Enough said on that.

I am laughing at anyone who takes any theoretical analytic tool created for one limited purpose (i.e. the concept of "Courtly Love" in Western Medieval epic and lyric poetry and writing) and tries to apply it (indeed, to MASH it) into modern kink relationships.  I'd find this just as amusing if someone posted that they were trying to fit WIIWD into the world of George Lucas, or of particle physics.  If that includes you, then so be it.

E




HutchGarahl -> RE: Courtly Love (6/11/2007 10:43:52 AM)

I see nothing wrong with courtly love. If you were to come to the town I live....you'd actually see it here a lot. The couples here do it daily. And I as well....I open doors, pull seats and what not. And if you were to ask one i've been in relations with they would tell you....I do serenade as well. But that actually depends on how deep into the relation I am in. :P




simplewhispers -> RE: Courtly Love (6/11/2007 10:46:35 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MellowSir

Well there ARE the rare exceptions lol, nowadays you're lucky if the people are even kind to each other, never mind the romantic side of things, how many couples have you seen that when they're out together, the attention is sorely lacking, a flower sent every now and then is a good thing, have the heart and all else follows.....


Amen[sm=applause.gif]




ExSteelAgain -> RE: Courtly Love (6/11/2007 10:48:43 AM)

The next time I'm whipping and she is whinning, I'm going to say in my best Clark Gable, southern courtly way, "Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn."




welshwmn3 -> RE: Courtly Love (6/11/2007 11:35:41 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

By and large this was a patriarchal society, which valued women based upon birth, ability to produce children, or as servants. Women just were not the equal of men.


I know you are talking about a more western european model, but there were civilizations in that time frame where men and women were valued the same.  The Mongolian Nation, under Ghengis Khan, for example, had both men and women in their armies (as warriors, the women weren't just around to feed the army) when they went out to conquor the whole world.  Yes, once a woman became a mother, she was respected more, and that was due to her procreative abilities.  But she wasn't valued ONLY for being a mother.

Also, the Norse valued women as highly as men.  Most of the household goods was owned by women, including the house itself.  If a woman was married and decided to divorce her man, all she had to do was put his personal belongings on the doorstep (and personal belongings meant his clothes, shoes, weapons, everything else was hers).

I know there were other cultures where the woman was respected and valued as much as the man (and not just for her ability to tend house and bear children), but I don't know as much about those cultures as I do about Mongolian and Norse/Viking.




ThinkingKitten -> RE: Courtly Love (6/11/2007 2:44:25 PM)

Other places for insight: the songs of the Comtesse de dia, such as "Ben volria mon cavalier". There's also the book "Romances of Chretien de Troyes" by Duggan (Yale Univ Press) - which was available for free download once upon a time, but now seems to only be available on pay sites - I have it, but can't find a current free link for it.
 
Was it all so romantic? Hardly. A lot of songs/writings talk of unrequited love, or forbidden love (of the female forced into an arranged marriage and her subsequent infidelities with her true love....... which might be as mild as a stolen glance all the way through to full out sex).
 
As a sideline, there is a Spanish version of the bagpipe called the "Gaita" (beautiful instrument, wonderful mellow sound) - the name stems from the middle ages when a wife and her lover would employ a watchman to keep a look out for the husband - and if he was spotted then the watchman was to blow a horn to alert them...
 





Trampler -> RE: Courtly Love (6/11/2007 2:57:37 PM)

Hmm. Well if I ever adopt courtly love as part of the way I interact with my subs, I will definately have to make some changes.  I hoping to hear some examples in how people have adopted it into their life.  Other then the common cortesy of opening door and what not. 




LadyHeart -> RE: Courtly Love (6/11/2007 5:13:09 PM)

My understanding of courtly love is that it was an ideal. All those beautiful sentiments were addressed to someone who was by definition unattainable. It was an elaborate game in which everyone knew the rules. The whole point of the Launcelot fiasco was that it trespassed across the boundaries and entered real life. In that, I can see a lot of correlations with BDSM. As long as it remians a game and everyone knows the rules, it is "safe." Once it enters everyday life, kingdoms can fall....
:))
LH




RealDom69 -> RE: Courtly Love (6/11/2007 6:43:41 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyHeart

My understanding of courtly love is that it was an ideal. All those beautiful sentiments were addressed to someone who was by definition unattainable. It was an elaborate game in which everyone knew the rules. The whole point of the Launcelot fiasco was that it trespassed across the boundaries and entered real life. In that, I can see a lot of correlations with BDSM. As long as it remians a game and everyone knows the rules, it is "safe." Once it enters everyday life, kingdoms can fall....
:))
LH


Here Here to that..... once it reaches real life ...  bye bye...

:))
Johnny Reble




juliaoceania -> RE: Courtly Love (6/11/2007 8:54:27 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: welshwmn3

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

By and large this was a patriarchal society, which valued women based upon birth, ability to produce children, or as servants. Women just were not the equal of men.


I know you are talking about a more western european model, but there were civilizations in that time frame where men and women were valued the same.  The Mongolian Nation, under Ghengis Khan, for example, had both men and women in their armies (as warriors, the women weren't just around to feed the army) when they went out to conquor the whole world.  Yes, once a woman became a mother, she was respected more, and that was due to her procreative abilities.  But she wasn't valued ONLY for being a mother.

Also, the Norse valued women as highly as men.  Most of the household goods was owned by women, including the house itself.  If a woman was married and decided to divorce her man, all she had to do was put his personal belongings on the doorstep (and personal belongings meant his clothes, shoes, weapons, everything else was hers).

I know there were other cultures where the woman was respected and valued as much as the man (and not just for her ability to tend house and bear children), but I don't know as much about those cultures as I do about Mongolian and Norse/Viking.



There are all kinds of different relationship structures all over the world, in addition to some female dominated cultures. I was not about to state that female subjugation is a cultural universal because I just do not believe it is... preaching to the choir here, and I have studied this some.




octavia -> RE: Courtly Love (6/11/2007 9:14:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Faramir

A 12th Century poet, Chretien de Troyes, took the Arthur stories from their Celtic/British (The Mabinogi and Geoffrey of Monmouth) setting and added in a series of stories about a Gaullic knight, Lancelot.  He both added in the story of Marc, Trastan and Iseult, but also borrowed and replciated the narrative, motifs and tropes of that story and added it in to the Lancelot-Guinivere story.  Thus a Brythonic/Cornish/Gaullic hybrid story emerges from Chterien, that becomes the very popular 13th Century Vulgate Cycle.

The courty love, the illicit/pure, fleshly/spiritual contradiction of courtly love is thus a product primarily of Chretien's writing.  Later, in the prose additions that make up half the Cycle, the Christian mores that condemn the love between Lancelot and Gunivere emerge, but in the 12 century poetic stories, the love does not have that guilt association.  You cna read any number of his stories, but the most familiar and popular is The Knight of the Cart.
....

Ummm.
Yeah, what he said.




domiguy -> RE: Courtly Love (6/11/2007 9:22:24 PM)

At heart, I am a true romantic...I enjoy bringing flowers for my love. She loves orchids. sitting together watching a beautiful sunrise or set... To see her face light up as I hand her a card, for no reason, just simply to show how important that she is to me...I have found that she enjoys reading my poetry....Right now I'm stuck...What word rhymes with smegma?




curiouspet55 -> RE: Courtly Love (6/11/2007 9:41:59 PM)

"The Lais of Marie de France" "The Letters of Abelard and Heloise" and "Arthurian Tales" (Chretian de Troyes) are all great examples.

I'm doing research on this topic next year at school. I don't have time now but if you'd ever like to discuss the topic more, let me know!

cp55




meticulousgirl -> RE: Courtly Love (6/12/2007 12:49:35 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MellowSir

Nothing wrong with showing some class, there sure seems a lack of it in today's world...holding the door for a woman, romance, etc etc. 'Tis a pity that it all seems to be about control and sex, where's the seduction? And what's wrong with flowers lol.... it's about treating a woman like a lady(sometimes lol), rather than a piece of meat or a toy, any ass can do that. And poetry? rapidly becoming a lost art in a relationship, those that don't have it and never have are usually the first to criticize it as well.....and forget actually serenading a woman, doesn't happen any more.....


I thought the world was going mad until I found your post Mellow.

I have to agree.  I may be a slave but that doesn't mean that I dont enjoy being the recipient of pink roses or carnations from time to time, or think that it isn't a nice feeling to have doors opened for me, or be taken out to dinner or a movie, a concert that I've had my heart set on going to for months, to be given a massage, or have a bubble bath drawn just for me.  I've had all of those things done and in a few circumstances those things have been a surprise, and have actually made me cry.  

Why does everything always have to be so harsh, why does it always have to be about putting the sub in her place and keeping her there especially if she is to remain monogomous and available for you. 

Most guys dont realize that being shown even just the smallest portion of care is the sweetest thing in the world.  Even if there isn't a lot of money to be spent one rose means the world (trust me I recieved my first ever from a guy a few months ago) being walked into a bathroom and seeing a bubble bath and smelling your favorite scent is precious enough in itself.   It's the thought that counts and if we see a guy putting a little effort into the relationship even if it isn't a relationship we're going to value it more than we did moments before.   

Maybe I'm just whacked out, and romanticizing a little to much but that's who I am.  I am a sub, a slave to the One that I currently serve but whenever something "vanilla" or romantic is done to show care or even a way of saying I love you in actions rather than words it still makes me cry sometimes because I'm not use to it and it makes the occassion seem all the more special.




SimplyMichael -> RE: Courtly Love (6/12/2007 1:03:18 PM)

Romance is part of courtly love but they are not one and the same.  Courtly love had a great deal to do with unrequited love, romance is just that and it can be found in all sorts of relationship.

I would hazard a guess many of the men here are very romantic, however most of the dominant ones at least would not be so big on the unrequited part.




bliss1 -> RE: Courtly Love (6/12/2007 1:56:47 PM)

As a woman there are times I really enjoy the Courtly Love aspects of life.  I enjoy feeling special.  Even had one Dom who made it a rule that I was not to open doors. 

Now the grandson is learning aspects - he loves being the big boy that opens the doors for sissy, mommie, and his nama.

To each their own.




BossyShoeBitch -> RE: Courtly Love (6/12/2007 3:27:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aileen68

Courtly love is just way too romantic for me...nothing mushy or sweet.  I think I'd laugh if a man sent me a romantic poem or whispered sweet nothings in my ear.

Wouldn't it depend on the man though?




RCdc -> RE: Courtly Love (6/12/2007 4:01:26 PM)

Courtly love has nothing to do with unrequited love, and everything to do with the perceived unobtainable.
 
If one was courtly, one dressed well and acted with grace or of a certain station.  Courtly love was often a lust untouchable - even aloof.  Distant and pertaining to the court.
In literature, it was a lighter love - an adventure.
 
It was a middle ages' conduct with specific rules of behaviour classified as 'ennobling' or rather a dignified action conducted with honour and even indicating that there was a sense of morality and celibacy - even in marriage.
It was a pretense that covered the facts - that people, even those that married, fucked - failed - and fornicated.  It was a way of exalting sex, without speaking it.
 
Peace
the.dark.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875