|
akbarbarian -> RE: Should a slave be opinionated? (6/15/2007 7:46:15 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MagiksSlave
quote:
ORIGINAL: EarthGoddess52
Has anyone here read akbarbarian's profile?? It seems that they haven't. This Dominant has moved since June 1 to an apartment with no furnishings and bought a new "toy" (a Corvette with a loud exhaust) to impress who?? a male coworker?? It seems he is now CAbarbarian as he has recently moved from Sitka, AK to California. His question in this forum seems rhetorical since he has stated in his profile and his blog notes that he expects his slave to like what he likes, dislike what he dislikes and if they aren't sure how to feel about something, just ask him and he will tell them. It seems that he does not want a slave who can think independently or question his authority. In my opinion, these things should have been foreseen and negotiated before the relationship commenced.
Well that answers that, it seems he doesnt wish for HIS slave to have any opinions of her own, (basically he dont want a slave he wants a robot) that has nothing to do with if should slaves be opinionated or not as we all know many many are (id say most but I dont want to generealise) His issue really is he doesnt beleave his slave should have opinions of her own and poorly picked the girl he chose to be his slave as she does have opinions. That isnt going to change unless you with to break her and while breaking her would stop her opinions it would also stop her from beeing a usefull person as a slave or anything and most likely wouldnt make her very emotionaly healthy. It seems he chose wrong and needs to deal with that now.
Magik's slave
I do have sort of an android fetish you might say. I don't think it's as rare or unreasonable as all that, it's just different from the way some people do things.
"En route to, and at his country estate, Petruchio begins his "taming" of his new wife. He keeps her from sleeping, invents reasons why she should not eat, and buys her beautiful clothes only to rip them up. When Kate, profoundly shaken by her experiences, is told that they are to return to Padua for Bianca's wedding, she is only too happy to comply. By the time they arrive, Kate's taming is complete and she no longer resists Petruchio. She complies in Petruchio's game, demonstrating her subordination to his will by agreeing that she will regard the moon as the sun, or the sun as the moon, if he demands it. She has understood her husband's method at last. Meanwhile, Tranio persuades a travelling pedant to pretend to be Vincentio. Baptista is pleased to meet Lucentio's father and agrees to the wedding. Petruchio and Kate return to Padua to attend Bianca's wedding. There is great confusion as all disguises collapse. However, everyone ends up married; Lucentio to Bianca and Hortensio to a rich widow. During the banquet, Petruchio brags that his wife, formerly untamable, is now completely obedient. Baptista, Hortensio, and Lucentio are incredulous and the latter two believe that their wives are more obedient. Petruchio proposes a wager in which each will send a servant to call for their wives, and whichever wife comes most obediently will have won the wager for her husband. Baptista, not believing that his shrewish Katherine has been tamed, offers an enormous second dowry in addition to the wager. Neither Bianca nor the widow responds to the call. Kate does, winning Petruchio a second dowry. Kate ends the play with a monologue explaining that wives should always obey their husbands and lords."
I make no claims to be politically correct, just honest. With those of us politically incorrect enough to use the term "slave", aren't there any to admit to the eroticism in this old tale? It is the fantasy of one playwright, does noone else share his sense of lust for female submission of that flavor? We can live any way we choose. If I chose to behave as Kate did, I could. If I can, someone else can too. There is someone to like it all, as "it takes all kinds", or "for every chair there is a derriere".
|
|
|
|
