RE: White House near decision to close Gitmo

RE: White House near decision to close Gitmo (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

Mercnbeth -> RE: White House near decision to close Gitmo (6/22/2007 1:11:41 PM)
I'd give much more credibility to anyone posting in this thread if they gave any indication of wanting to require the same behavior from our adversaries as they do from the US. Instead, we have the usual juvenile name calling and "we are no better..." argument prevails. Telling in and of itself of the hypocritical nature of the position. quote: human rights, freedom and life are merely pretty words if they only apply to one nationality..... Philo, That's a great statement. I'd say it was true and should be acted upon. The words, "human rights, freedom, and life" are also just noise when they have meaning to only one side of the conflict, and the other side doesn't respect or understand them. The least common denominator definition than should apply, in this case - our adversaries; who define "human rights" as something limited to men, "freedom" limited to the definition and strict interpretation of th Koran, and "life" valued only as much as the hero status given to children who are sacrificed when used as human smart bombs.

cyberdude611 -> RE: White House near decision to close Gitmo (6/22/2007 1:17:27 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: juliaoceania You know, as someone that used to be a card carrying member of the ACLU I have to tell you, I DO care very much that our government does not attempt to circumvent the constitution... It is not that I use all the evil shit Bush does as a justification to say he is bad... quite the opposite, I look at all the evil shit he does and I know he is bad... big diff. To try to paint people that do not illegal wars, torturing people without due process, extraordinary rendition, and spying on the American people as though "well they just do not like Bush so it doesn't matter what they say even though it is valid" is not honest discourse. The Constitution does not extend to foreign nationals. Our founders did not want it to, and our Supreme Court agrees. The Constitution is not a human rights document for every citizen of the world. It just was not designed to work that way. The Constitution also has no jurisdiction outside America's borders. During World War 2, we executed several Nazi spies. They never had a civilian trial here. They were tried in front of a military tribunal. The US Supreme Court said it was acceptable. Human rights during times of war are protected by the Geneva Conventions. But that agreement is practically obsolete today because of various loopholes that have formed. According to the document, only uniformed soldiers captured during war are protected by the Geneva Conventions. Terrorists are usually wearing civilian clothing...which makes them exempt from the agreement. There has also not been an official declaration of war by the US, Iraq, or Afghanistan. So in legal terms....there is no war going on.

philosophy -> RE: White House near decision to close Gitmo (6/22/2007 1:20:06 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth The words, "human rights, freedom, and life" are also just noise when they have meaning to only one side of the conflict, and the other side doesn't respect or understand them. The least common denominator definition than should apply, in this case - our adversaries; who define "human rights" as something limited to men, "freedom" limited to the definition and strict interpretation of th Koran, and "life" valued only as much as the hero status given to children who are sacrificed when used as human smart bombs. ....i agree with you Merc, in all of the above bar the section i have italicised. i truly believe that what you suggest is simply the wrong way to look at such situations. Arguably it is precisely in situations like this that we must hold on to our 'higher' moral standards. Otherwise we negate all the other times we act, shall we say, honourably. Imagine a man who lives a blameless life until he finds himself in opposition to an unscrupulous businessman. In response to the latters illegal business practices he also engages in such practices. They are both arrested and charged......the businessman is clearly wrong, we would both agree he deserves to be punished according to the law, however i also believe the originally blameless man may also be charged....alhough he may claim some mitigation he is still in the wrong. To lower ourselves to the same standards as an enemy is to allow them to win in the most subtle and insidious of ways.....

Mercnbeth -> RE: White House near decision to close Gitmo (6/22/2007 1:41:17 PM)
quote: philosophy: i truly believe that what you suggest is simply the wrong way to look at such situations. Arguably it is precisely in situations like this that we must hold on to our 'higher' moral standards. Otherwise we negate all the other times we act, shall we say, honorably. I would so love to agree and be on your side of this issue. Any indication of reciprocity would move my attitude closer to yours. Your comparisons to business 'war' aren't applicable. For the most part, people don't die because of business practices, and few businesses sacrifice the lives of their children to accomplish the corporate 'mission statement'. You know what, I'd agree right now that my position is wrong - morally. Pragmatically however, it is the only position that can be taken regarding our adversaries and provides a method of victory against them.

philosophy -> RE: White House near decision to close Gitmo (6/22/2007 1:48:25 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth quote: philosophy: i truly believe that what you suggest is simply the wrong way to look at such situations. Arguably it is precisely in situations like this that we must hold on to our 'higher' moral standards. Otherwise we negate all the other times we act, shall we say, honorably. I would so love to agree and be on your side of this issue. Any indication of reciprocity would move my attitude closer to yours. Your comparisons to business 'war' aren't applicable. For the most part, people don't die because of business practices, and few businesses sacrifice the lives of their children to accomplish the corporate 'mission statement'. You know what, I'd agree right now that my position is wrong - morally. Pragmatically however, it is the only position that can be taken regarding our adversaries and provides a method of victory against them. ...i agree that my business metaphor isn't exact, but when it comes to morality the principles have a habit of becoming absolute. Ultimately i think the only main difference between us is that i genuinely doubt that the practices you suggest will provide a method of victory. More likely in my opinion is that the conflict becomes generational....as the children of people abused today (by both sides) becomes the abusers of tomorrow. The only solution that i can see is to draw a moral line in the sand....it may make the conflict more complex but it has the capacity to defuse it in the long term....... [edited for poorer than usual grammar]

popeye1250 -> RE: White House near decision to close Gitmo (6/22/2007 2:01:29 PM)
Philosophy, it's not about being better than al qeada it's about killing them before they kill us.

philosophy -> RE: White House near decision to close Gitmo (6/22/2007 2:05:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: popeye1250 Philosophy, it's not about being better than al qeada it's about killing them before they kill us. ...perhaps, but the problem with Gitmo is that no-one really knows if they are all Al Quaeda.........trials might sort that one out.....

nighthawk3569 -> RE: White House near decision to close Gitmo (6/22/2007 3:35:49 PM)
*"It's God's job to forgive Bin Laden* *It's our job to arrange the meeting"* *The United States Marine Corps* *Fast reply...to no one in particular*

kiyari -> RE: White House near decision to close Gitmo (6/22/2007 3:54:48 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: farglebargle If we don't treat prisoners humanly, then what's the difference between them and us? This is a hard one. NOT sarcasm. Rules of War is an oxymoron. I have seen a sig I have to agree with: If something is worth fighting for, then it is worth fighting Dirty for. Now, this as well, has it's range of application. Some might think the power to exploit 3rd world labor is 'worth fighting for'. Those among us with principles might draw the line at more extreme positions... The point being... If something is worth fighting, killing, dying for... then in truth, it ought be No Holds Barred. The place to argue then, is the point at which the 'worth' applies. As an aside... only a moron would 'fight fair', where the opposing side does not. Moron: Darwin Awards candidate http://www.darwinawards.com/ ADDED: The 'intelligence value' of information extracted under torture is, optimistically speaking, 'low'. Who among us would not confess to 'whatever', or make up something plausible to satisfy our interrogators, to end the fright of torture by hostile forces?

kiyari -> RE: White House near decision to close Gitmo (6/22/2007 3:57:16 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: caitlyn We are hyper-powerful, and should hold ourselves to a higher standard. "Little Johnny tortures too.", is a crummy justification. Ooh! I am gonna steal this for my Sig collection!!!

kiyari -> RE: White House near decision to close Gitmo (6/22/2007 4:02:42 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: subrob1967 Uh, we don't strap 10lbs of Semtex onto unmentionables and send them off to die. Neither, I suspect, have ANY of those poor creatures at Gitmo No, of course I have no 'proof'... but then, nor have you...

philosophy -> RE: White House near decision to close Gitmo (6/22/2007 4:04:49 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: kiyari As an aside... only a moron would 'fight fair', where the opposing side does not. .....a moron or someone to whom the word ethics is more than an english county with a lisp........

kiyari -> RE: White House near decision to close Gitmo (6/22/2007 4:18:42 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: nighthawk3569 *"It's God's job to forgive Bin Laden* *It's our job to arrange the meeting"* *The United States Marine Corps* *Fast reply...to no one in particular* SUPER SIG!!! Thank You I may have my doubts about Bin Laden having anything at all to do with 9-11 ...and I had [pre 9-11] never, ever, heard of the mythological Enemy now widely known as 'al queda' None of this, however, diminishes the Greatness of this as a Sig-line

farglebargle -> RE: White House near decision to close Gitmo (6/22/2007 4:36:52 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BOUNTYHUNTER I have many time and continue to do so..Theses days and times call for measures our founding fathers couldn't have imagine.. That's pretty much what Hitler said after Kristalsnacht.

farglebargle -> RE: White House near decision to close Gitmo (6/22/2007 4:39:09 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth quote: What part of ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL, and UNALIENABLE RIGHTS don't you understand? Last night while I was sleeping did the rest of the world and its population all became citizens and part of the USA abdicating their Constitutions in favor of the ours? That's the Declaration of Independence.

farglebargle -> RE: White House near decision to close Gitmo (6/22/2007 4:41:53 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: luckydog1 Look farg has openly admited he hates the US constitution, and only uses it for loopholes to bring down the the Government. He only wants the rights in it, not the responsibilites. It's not for me to like or hate. It IS for the Federal Government to obey, Unconditionally. quote: He often claims the right to shoot anyone who threatens him or his family, with no trial....his sputtering about inaliable rights and due process for everyone is nonsense. I am not the Federal Government, created and bound by the Constitution, am I? Nope, I am a PERSON, therefore the Constitution is MEANINGLESS FOR ME. It ONLY specifies the permissible acts of the Federal Government. You want to give the Feds permission to torture people, CHANGE THE CONSTITUTION. Until you do change it, these are the rules THE GOVERNMENT MUST OBEY.

farglebargle -> RE: White House near decision to close Gitmo (6/22/2007 4:43:21 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BOUNTYHUNTER WE aren't discussing everyone ,just theses turban wearing Muslims that are trying to kill us in the name of their religion..Plain and simple,our laws shouldn't apply to every tom,dick or harry that is a major threat to our country..What is good for the goose isn't good for the gander..bounty So, what does Due Process and Equal Protection mean?

Real0ne -> RE: White House near decision to close Gitmo (6/22/2007 4:46:30 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: popeye1250 Sorry but I'm just not one of those people who has any type of sympathy for al qeada in any way, shape or form. Wouldn't it be funny if, after 6 months of being housed in an Afgani prison the lefties start yelling; "Open up GTMO again! Afgani prisons are too cruel!" Oh, I don't think so! lol then you must love the cia since they created them :)

farglebargle -> RE: White House near decision to close Gitmo (6/22/2007 4:47:22 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BOUNTYHUNTER snip..{I disagree. But let me ask you this, since to you it would be acceptable. Would you rape that person's child in front of them, if it would help loosen their tongue? In your calculus of life, what's one more dead child to save 100,000 people -- or your own family -- to you? It appears that would be acceptable to your twisted logic? Would you kill their child to make them talk? How are you any different from them? }...Lets turn that around back to what I asked you..Would you see a child or yours kill if you knew torture to get info to save said child,then what farglebargle would you do? Be the first to turn the crank or sit on your hands and watch..YOU can't have your cake and eat it too,you wrap yourself in the stars and strips to try to prove your point what times you aren't hiding behind it..bounty f This *IS interesting. Are FREE MEN AND WOMEN bound by the restrictions of action specified in the Federal Constitution? Of COURSE THEY AREN'T. So it's wrong to pretend that someone acting as an individual is the same class as someone acting on behalf of The People's Government. So, while you'd choose to muddy the waters, you haven't told us if TO YOU it was acceptable for a Government Agent to rape and murder a child to obtain information from their parents, POTENTIALLY saving many lives. Well, DO YOU SANCTION RAPING AND MURDERING CHILDREN TO TORTURE SECRETS OUT OF THEIR PARENTS, IF IT WILL MAKE THE SUBJECT TALK? Own ALL the implications of your beliefs.

farglebargle -> RE: White House near decision to close Gitmo (6/22/2007 4:49:08 PM)
quote: I'd give much more credibility to anyone posting in this thread if they gave any indication of wanting to require the same behavior from our adversaries as they do from the US The essential difference being that the "Enemy" isn't torturing people IN YOUR NAME, and AGAINST YOUR RULES. If there's no ETHICAL OR MORAL difference between Them and Us, why are we fighting them?

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

3.515625E-02