Picture question...

Picture question... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

instynctive -> Picture question... (6/22/2007 5:47:59 PM)
How in the world does this picture "does not fall within [the] community standards"? http://i142.photobucket.com/albums/r99/instynctive/bw_butt.jpg No commercial photos or artwork - Only pictures you took yourself I did in fact take it myself... No extreme or vulgar pictures I've seen more skin on NYPD Blue... No objects or places for your primary photo Are they insinuating My sub is an object? Or that her butt is a place...? No explicit genital nudity or hardcore bondage Again, I've seen more skin on NYPD Blue... and if rope dresses are considered "hardcore bondage", then W/we didn't realize this was the "kiddy pool"... Persons who appear underage will be asked to furnish proof of age W/we can sign, notarize, seal and send proof of age.. So seriously.. is it the fact that it's a butt shot? If so, why couldn't someone just tell U/us that, instead of a vague "does not fall within [the] community standards" when O/our interpretation of the standards indicates otherwise...? Thanks...

BossyShoeBitch -> RE: Picture question... (6/22/2007 5:53:42 PM)
I agree with you. The picture you see of me here got rejected several times. I put it as a secondary and it was ok'd, then I switched it a week or so later to primary and it got approved. It's so subjective and their guidelines are so vague that it really depends on the mood of whoever is overseeing them that day I guess.. Love your picture by the way...

instynctive -> RE: Picture question... (6/22/2007 6:07:57 PM)
Well.. you have inspired me to keep submitting the picture... :-) And thank you for your compliments.. you can't see it, but her ass was a beautiful shade of crimson after a good hour of tooling it... I figured that was the reason it originally bounced, so I converted it to grayscale and cranked up the brightness and contrast.. now it's "art" right? LOL

BOUNTYHUNTER -> RE: Picture question... (6/22/2007 6:11:59 PM)
I know where you'll are coming from, I have tried to post pics of my subs bare breasted and have had them rejected.I see many total nudes on here.I guess it who you know...bounty

instynctive -> RE: Picture question... (6/22/2007 6:56:05 PM)
I bet if she was 18 and a size 0 with D cups the picture would have been approved. ;-)

slaverosebeauty -> RE: Picture question... (6/22/2007 8:04:50 PM)
Its a community double standard, honestly, get use to it, it happens all the time. Plenty of threads on it. Just resubmit, it depends on WHO gets your pics to approve. I have had pics be 'denied' 3 or 4 times, then approved later, same pic, nothing changed. You get use to it.

mnottertail -> RE: Picture question... (6/22/2007 8:39:19 PM)
what is it a picture of?

stef -> RE: Picture question... (6/22/2007 8:40:05 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: instynctive How in the world does this picture "does not fall within [the] community standards"? Your primary profile photo is supposed to be one that includes your face. That's a bit too far south to count, don't you think? ~stef

instynctive -> RE: Picture question... (6/22/2007 8:47:13 PM)
Click on the link in my original post... quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail what is it a picture of?

instynctive -> RE: Picture question... (6/22/2007 8:48:26 PM)
So if I put a gas mask on her butt then it would be okay? ;-) quote: ORIGINAL: stef Your primary profile photo is supposed to be one that includes your face. That's a bit too far south to count, don't you think? ~stef

domiguy -> RE: Picture question... (6/22/2007 9:54:40 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: instynctive So if I put a gas mask on her butt then it would be okay? ;-) quote: ORIGINAL: stef Your primary profile photo is supposed to be one that includes your face. That's a bit too far south to count, don't you think? ~stef Is she lactose intolerant?

LafayetteLady -> RE: Picture question... (6/22/2007 10:03:38 PM)
I thought another rule for pictures was that they had to be of the person whose profile it was? In other words, as your profile lists you as a "dominant male", the picture should be of YOU, not your sub. Perhaps I am mistaken about this, I didn't return and look it up, this is just from memory.

instynctive -> RE: Picture question... (6/23/2007 5:04:07 AM)
LL.. I'm looking at the photo rules, and not seeing a rules that states it has to be Me; nor am I seeing a rule that states My face has to be included... No commercial photos or artwork - Only pictures you took yourself No extreme or vulgar pictures No objects or places for your primary photo No explicit genital nudity or hardcore bondage Persons who appear underage will be asked to furnish proof of age W/we live in a very small town, and a certain degree of anonymity is required... plus I am always proud to show off my "handy work". :-)

stef -> RE: Picture question... (6/23/2007 12:11:10 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: instynctive So if I put a gas mask on her butt then it would be okay? ;-) If you think it would be less offensive than putting the mask on her face, that's entirely possible. ~stef

instynctive -> RE: Picture question... (6/24/2007 8:12:47 AM)
Meh.. they win.. I "artsied" up a picture of Myself in photoshop and submitted that. It's kind of a stupid picture, but oh well. lol

HutchGarahl -> RE: Picture question... (6/25/2007 12:08:37 AM)
Maybe it was too bright. I'm sure it was a nice picture, but really hun...it hurt my eyes. If you could tone down the brightness a bit, i'd love to see it again.

instynctive -> RE: Picture question... (6/25/2007 6:23:02 AM)
"Too bright"? Didn't see that in the photo requirements.. ;-) I figured the issue they had was the "hardcore bondage" of the rope dress, or how incredibly red I made her ass... I'll attempt to get it online as one of the secondary pictures..

Page: [1]

Collarchat.com © 2026

Terms of Service

0.03125