thetammyjo
Posts: 6322
Joined: 9/8/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MsCameron quote:
ORIGINAL: littlesarbonn Strictness. Yeah, that sounds strange, but let me explain. In previous relationships, I always seemed to be involved with women that were set in their ways, and they would go out of their way to make sure you understood that. A lot of women I've talked to claim to be exactly that, but I've observed a variation to that rather than what I remember being more of a norm. There is a strictness to detail, a desire to have exactness in one's interactions, but there's another piece to the puzzle that was hard for me to realize was missing. And I think I finally put my finger on it. "Expectation." So, let me explain because that's probably confusing now. I'll give an example that a lot of people might recognize. If you read a dominant woman's profile on the boards, you may take away a sense of "strictness" from the profile, in that she wants things done her way. But when you deconstruct that, there seems to be more of a sense of "things are done my way, or you go away" rather than "things are done my way, and you'll be damn sorry if you don't comply." I find that nuance to be actually quite significant. I'll take a stab at this. I think what you're talking about is an attitude of "written in stone" expectation. Consent has already been given. "Things done my way or you go away" implies negotiation, does it not? It almost gives a choice. That's where I think you're feeling the lack of strictness. In my mind, once consent is given, I don't want to negotiate every service. I want it done the way I want or there will be consequences. I'm not sure what's in my mind is translating well to the keyboard. MC Actually I read "my way or you go away" as being the exact opposite of negotiation. No negotiation, merely one way and you aren't important enough to even attempt to figure out if there is a better way to do things. The consequences are rather final in that situation. There will be no attempts to bend you or break you or teach, you are dimissed. Period. I think that could be seen as th height of strictness and viewing the sub/slave as nothing but a disposal object. I, personally, think that in a healthy full-time Ds relationship all that is needed is the displeasure of the owner/dominant when something is not correct. Someone who makes errors a lot either is not mature enough or frankly not a good match for that person. At worse they may be acting up to earn punishment. I don't think being strict is about correcting it's about supporting the authority dynamic you have agree to, both of you have agreed to. I don't think that being strict should be a reason to do SM or anything else. My ownership gives me the authority to do whatever I wish (in that relationship) I don't need more of a reason than I want to at that moment. Being my property gives that person the responsibility to tell me when he/she needs something they lack, that's part of taking care of my property after all. Acting up instead of addressing the need openly and honestly is playing games. I don't play games with my 24/7 Ds relationship, well, at least not those types of games. Everyone may play these sorts of games early on because they feel unsettled in a new relationship but I think over time that should disappear as you help each other fully explore and embrace your Ds position.
_____________________________
Love, Peace, Hugs, Kisses, Whips & Chains, TammyJo Check out my website at http://www.thetammyjo.com Or www.tammyjoeckhart.com And my LJ where I post fiction in progress if you "friend" me at http://thetammyjo.livejournal.com/
|