slavedesires -> RE: respect in regards to desires, esp Gifting (6/16/2004 8:01:53 PM)
|
thank You Sir for your reply.... i do appreciate what You have said. my use of the words "she" or "subs" in in reference to some on this web site and on another one and also from IM's. it is used collectively except in reference to one particular ub. i used the word "contentious" ot describe severl subs because the word contentious means the "act of contending" which is to "be combative, quarellsome, opposing, striving", etc.... and from what her profile says and the words she uses (the particular one i am thinking of right now), she believes in the 4 agreements of Don Ruiz. i do not judge her lifestyle, she judges mine and the One who owns me. when subs write back to me and say ... "fuck off you freak" ...i think the words speak very loudly and yes, with gross disrespect. i judge the response Sir, not them. The response is contentious and lacks respect. but when the correspeondence gets to be half dozen return (and some lengthy) emails, i think i have a better handle of who they might be and might be able to, at that point, make a fairly accurate assessment of their nature. i have kept all correspondence and even when i was greeted with "fuck off your frreak" i responded respectfully and i might have to say, kindly. why should i respond in kind? i understand how this might all sound hypocritical to You for i did not fully explain the whole course of communication and i will not do so for it would expose someone that might be gnuinely very sweet and submissive, but with words has judged me (U/us) and and has been grossly disrepectful to U/us and i have been polite and kind in return. You are correct Sir, it did sound like i was making gross assumptions regarding her (this one particular sub) nature, i think i can fairly well say she is not only disrespectful and impolite but very rude and contenious in the way she has responded to me and i have been nothing but kind. and have one last unread message waiting for me as i wrote. i will read it and probably not respond.... for such disrespect requires neither my time or attention to respond. Yes, Master has told me generally what it says. Sir? You may ask for my correspondence and see for Yourself.... i have amazed Master Damian with my kindness and patience toward one particular sub. When i send email Sir, i tend to realize that many times subs are under pressure to say something, or they do not want to understand, or they might say the first thing on their head and heart, or they may just be impolite or disrespectful or judgemental for they still need mentoring and guidance, or they simply are just head strong and bratty....there are so many reasons why people respond the way they do. So i try to take the words they use and create some form of teaching tool and unless i take some time to help them understand in some kind and patient way that the nature of their reply is not welcome for it is judgemental and disrespectful.... but, i will NOT return the same to them. i have called attention to words they use and they have no idea the value of them at times. tis something i am learning. for example..... "arrangant" , in reference to Master, many subs see self confidence as arrogance when they are insecure themselves. i am sure Sir some would call You arrogant rather than self confident. Which characteristic is most truthful of You and which do You prefer to be characteristized? if You are not arrogant, then is it not judgemental, for she has no proof other than Your words? Just attmepting to let You understand how i think. i will examine my words, Sir, that i am not contentious or hypocritical or judgemntal. My words must reflect my motives and yes, i am still lerning how to do this. graciously, Master Damian's shy
|
|
|
|