Lordandmaster -> RE: In the beginning...(with a twist) (7/11/2005 1:56:08 PM)
|
I only very reluctantly get into conversations about God, because it's a great way not to have a productive conversation, but I'll assume you're serious and explain what I take to be the major argument in favor of atheism. Kid asks his priest (or Mom, or teacher, whatever), "Why do you believe in God?" And the authority figure responds, "Well, son, of course you have to believe in God, otherwise, how can you explain the universe that you see all around you? Where did it come from?" Kid says, "Oh, so you mean someone must have created it?" "Right, because obviously it couldn't have created itself. That would be illogical, wouldn't it?" Kid says, "OK, I get it, so God created the universe." Pause. "But then who created God?" At that point, the whole silly theistic argument falls apart. We assume that the universe couldn't have created itself, because that is supposed to be some kind of logical fallacy--and our solution is just to postulate a God who created everything, and not ask where HE came from? God is not a solution to the problem at all. It's just a way of deferring all the metaphysical difficulties back one stage--and then conveniently not asking very much about what happens at that earlier stage, because our knowledge and logic are, of course, inadequate to deal with the issues. I'm not pretending that I know how the universe came to be, but saying that God created it isn't an answer. Lam quote:
ORIGINAL: kisshou Does something have to exist in order for you to believe it does not exist? (does that make sense) I can never understand the logic behind the concept of atheism.
|
|
|
|