VadFarkas -> RE: This Iron Maiden is not just another Cruel Mistress (12/13/2007 6:56:28 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: mnottertail you are given a key(and a spare), they are standard locks...........the act of locking will be viewed differently by the tort system than the common act of screwing (and non-standard or not readily available wrenches) kinda thing. That is the best shot I can give you here. Ron Thanks Ron, After reading this and other comments regarding a key and padlock option, I came up with this version: http://www.ringofsteel.net/images/lockinback.jpg The lock can be either in the back like the photo or up front by inserting the pin from the opposite direction but didn't like the bulky look. So I came up with this latest design that has the padlock fixed to the cage: http://www.ringofsteel.net/images/imlock.jpg I still don't like the idea of the lock because in both cases, it is the weak point. Wear as the screw is also Stainless Steel and there is no worry about corrosion problems, that is not the case with the padlocks. However this second version eliminates the loose padlock but creates another in that if the lock gets damaged, the whole unit is useless as opposed to just cutting off the padlock and replacing it. The question is how this would be worn... for play, then either padlock versions would be OK or if a more lengthy less maintenance use, the screw closing. I believe that only Death & Taxes are totally escape proof, so my items are not meant to be. Anyway, as always, I enjoy all your comments that might result in a better product. Thanks once again. Not sure why the photos don't open, let me repost the links.http://www.ringofsteel.net/images/lockinback.jpghttp://www.ringofsteel.net/images/imlock.jpg
|
|
|
|