Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: 9/11 non-sympathizers


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: 9/11 non-sympathizers Page: <<   < prev  10 11 [12] 13 14   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 9/11 non-sympathizers - 9/13/2007 8:23:28 PM   
luckydog1


Posts: 2736
Joined: 1/16/2006
Status: offline
Well yes Jay, if we all submit to Islam there will be peace (though you might want to explain that to the Muslims of Darfur who thought they could keep thier language and culture and are now being exterminated by the Peace loving Arab speaking Muslims of Sudan).  I look at the reaction of the Muslim world to the ongoing slaughter and find not much but a big yawn and saying they deserve it.   If we were all happy slaves of anything there would be peace (absence of conflict).  That is not the sort of world I want, perhaps you do.

(in reply to luckydog1)
Profile   Post #: 221
RE: 9/11 non-sympathizers - 9/13/2007 8:23:47 PM   
jaymckenas


Posts: 146
Joined: 4/10/2007
Status: offline
We aren't occupying Germany, Italy, or Japan....

_____________________________

What can I say? When Bananas dance, I watch.

(in reply to luckydog1)
Profile   Post #: 222
RE: 9/11 non-sympathizers - 9/13/2007 8:26:11 PM   
luckydog1


Posts: 2736
Joined: 1/16/2006
Status: offline
Uh, thier governments are required by our law to use the Constitutions we wrote for them.  And we keep massive armies in thier nations.  How do you define "occupation"?

(in reply to jaymckenas)
Profile   Post #: 223
RE: 9/11 non-sympathizers - 9/13/2007 8:27:41 PM   
jaymckenas


Posts: 146
Joined: 4/10/2007
Status: offline
I do not desire us to be "slaves" to anything. The idea of peace can be attained through Christianity/Judaism/Zoroastrianism/ etc. etc. etc. It's merely a matter of coming to terms with tolerating each others existance. You have no knowledge of Islam, you know only of fundamentalist sects and terrorist groups as well as ethnic-spurred conflict in sudan. That has nothing to do with Islam, it is deeply ethnically motivated, not religiously. You seem to frown upon my ideologies and even your misinterpretations of them are better than your outlook, considering your complete indifference to the massive genocide occuring in Sudan, how can you be one to judge a quest for peace? Perhaps if the US was aiding the Sudanese instead of decimating Iraq, such things could be avoided.

_____________________________

What can I say? When Bananas dance, I watch.

(in reply to jaymckenas)
Profile   Post #: 224
RE: 9/11 non-sympathizers - 9/13/2007 8:29:17 PM   
jaymckenas


Posts: 146
Joined: 4/10/2007
Status: offline
None of those three are required to follow consititutions we wrote for them. If they were, they'd probably be in Iraq right now....

_____________________________

What can I say? When Bananas dance, I watch.

(in reply to jaymckenas)
Profile   Post #: 225
RE: 9/11 non-sympathizers - 9/13/2007 8:30:45 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydog1

"Imagine what life would have been like, if FDR or Truman had gamed WWII,to make it last in-deffinately.Like bush is doing with the Iraq war.He just said in his speech,that we weren`t leaving Iraq,and that the next president will have to deal with it.        That is the definition of cowerdice. "

We haven't left Germany, Japan, or Italy.  So you are saying FDR did set up a perpetual war and calling him a coward.  you said this in an attempt to deflect from your quote of his nonsense"nothing to fear..."  he rounded people up by race and grabbed power in un preceented ways.

He didn`t game the war, to make it last forever(like bush).

He won WWII ! And did it in 4 years.

And he won the peace.Something bush has no clue how to do.

Right now, we`re referees in a civil war.There was nothing like that,in WWII.

We didn`t act unilaterally in WWII,and had no real imperialistic ambitions,like the Europeans did.

What`s your point?



< Message edited by Owner59 -- 9/13/2007 8:31:35 PM >


_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to luckydog1)
Profile   Post #: 226
RE: 9/11 non-sympathizers - 9/13/2007 8:32:09 PM   
luckydog1


Posts: 2736
Joined: 1/16/2006
Status: offline
Your smoking rock Jay.  All 3 are helping us in Iraq and Afghanistan.  They are forbidden by the constitutions which we wrote and imposed at gunpoint (a-bomb point) to have offensive armies (Germany and Japan, Italy has an army but it is tiny.. again by our imposed law)

(in reply to jaymckenas)
Profile   Post #: 227
RE: 9/11 non-sympathizers - 9/13/2007 8:34:04 PM   
luckydog1


Posts: 2736
Joined: 1/16/2006
Status: offline
owner59 so you are saying Bush should act like FDR, and round up the Arabs in America and start carpet bombing and throwing nukes?  Somehow I do not think you are.

(in reply to luckydog1)
Profile   Post #: 228
RE: 9/11 non-sympathizers - 9/13/2007 8:36:30 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydog1

Uh, thier governments are required by our law to use the Constitutions we wrote for them.  And we keep massive armies in thier nations.  How do you define "occupation"?


Not Italy or Japan. We left almost right away,and on good terms.Bush wants us in Iraq indefinitely,at a 1000 soldiers killed a year.Do you really think that`s a good idea?

We stayed in Germany to fight the cold war.This is History 101.

What`s your point?


_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to luckydog1)
Profile   Post #: 229
RE: 9/11 non-sympathizers - 9/13/2007 8:38:11 PM   
Alumbrado


Posts: 5560
Status: offline
Actually (a minor quibble), Japan has an offensive army...they revised things a few years ago.

http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/0206/p06s01-woap.html

(in reply to luckydog1)
Profile   Post #: 230
RE: 9/11 non-sympathizers - 9/13/2007 8:40:45 PM   
luckydog1


Posts: 2736
Joined: 1/16/2006
Status: offline
owner we are still in Japan and Itlay.  We never left.  We stayed in all 3.  Simple undeniable fact.  Why you are pretending otherwise is way beyond me.  Bush wants 1000 dead a year?  I do not think so.  But then of course you can read minds and support punishing people on what thier thoughts are decided to be.

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 231
RE: 9/11 non-sympathizers - 9/13/2007 8:46:28 PM   
luckydog1


Posts: 2736
Joined: 1/16/2006
Status: offline
Not really an offensive army, did you read the whole article....
"Japan can count on America, and increasingly, America can count on Japan," he said. But he nudged the nation to expand "self-defense" to include the defense of US forces should they come under attack near Japan. "We're just working for a little more flexibility so that the US and Japanese colleagues of the Self-Defense Forces would be able to come to each other's assistance should it be necessary," he said.

And as I already pointed out they are helping in the mideast with supplies and logistics.

And they are doing it to a large degree because we want them to, which I think bolsters my point.

(in reply to luckydog1)
Profile   Post #: 232
RE: 9/11 non-sympathizers - 9/13/2007 8:50:59 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydog1

Your smoking rock Jay.  All 3 are helping us in Iraq and Afghanistan.  They are forbidden by the constitutions which we wrote and imposed at gunpoint (a-bomb point) to have offensive armies (Germany and Japan, Italy has an army but it is tiny.. again by our imposed law)



It`s almost a Freudian slip on your part,luckydog,when you said "All 3",because that`s about how many men Italy and Japan, have in Iraq,.....3.

And Germany has zero troops, in Iraq.Google,use it.

As far as smoking dope,your pipe runith over,luckydog.

Consider yourself wrong and corrected,lucky dog.



_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to luckydog1)
Profile   Post #: 233
RE: 9/11 non-sympathizers - 9/13/2007 8:56:38 PM   
luckydog1


Posts: 2736
Joined: 1/16/2006
Status: offline
Hmm, so you do not know what a freudian slip is.  Just a fancy word for you to use.  Germany is heavily involved in helping us there....they do not have an offensive army, so they are not helping in that regard (troops on the ground).  So what?  I never asserted that Germany has a single soldier in Iraq.  All 3 governments are providing massive help to the effort though.  It is great that you can attack and disprove things I never even came close to asserting.  Do you know what that is called?  So I guess we have beaten this to the ground and you are admitting your loss.  Because that is what making a strawman argumet is, an admit of intelectuall defeat.

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 234
RE: 9/11 non-sympathizers - 9/13/2007 8:57:26 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydog1

owner we are still in Japan and Itlay.  We never left.  We stayed in all 3.  Simple undeniable fact.  Why you are pretending otherwise is way beyond me.  Bush wants 1000 dead a year?  I do not think so.  But then of course you can read minds and support punishing people on what thier thoughts are decided to be.


Do the math.

We`re losing a 1000 men a year right now,and the death rate is rising.An undeniable fact,btw.bush wants us there till he leaves(said so tonight),and beyond.
That`s a 1000 right there,and then there`s the mess to clean up after he leaves,assuming he leaves voluntarily.

Bush wants 1000 dead a year?  I do not think so. 
 
He just said tonight,that he`s kicking the can down the road,and leaving the mess for the next pres.At the rate our men are dying,that`s a 1000,or  more dead,before he leaves.
 
 

< Message edited by Owner59 -- 9/13/2007 9:01:26 PM >


_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to luckydog1)
Profile   Post #: 235
RE: 9/11 non-sympathizers - 9/13/2007 9:00:06 PM   
luckydog1


Posts: 2736
Joined: 1/16/2006
Status: offline
He wants the soldiers to die?  I disagree.  I think he considers it a neccessary loss, which is a point that can be debated.   Of course I can't read minds like you...

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 236
RE: 9/11 non-sympathizers - 9/13/2007 9:01:17 PM   
jaymckenas


Posts: 146
Joined: 4/10/2007
Status: offline
Luckydog... Your "intelecuall argumets" are astounding.....

The Germans want nothing to do with American involvement in Iraq and are providing minimal assistance.

The US has no right infringing on Iraqi sovereignty, and Germany, Italy, Japan are all intelligent enough to know that.

_____________________________

What can I say? When Bananas dance, I watch.

(in reply to luckydog1)
Profile   Post #: 237
RE: 9/11 non-sympathizers - 9/13/2007 9:04:28 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jaymckenas

Luckydog... Your "intelecuall argumets" are astounding.....

The Germans want nothing to do with American involvement in Iraq and are providing minimal assistance.

The US has no right infringing on Iraqi sovereignty, and Germany, Italy, Japan are all intelligent enough to know that.


Infringment,  shidgment....

neo-cons think they own/run/can fuck the world,and everyone in it.

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to jaymckenas)
Profile   Post #: 238
RE: 9/11 non-sympathizers - 9/13/2007 9:05:22 PM   
jaymckenas


Posts: 146
Joined: 4/10/2007
Status: offline
Touche' Owner.

_____________________________

What can I say? When Bananas dance, I watch.

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 239
RE: 9/11 non-sympathizers - 9/13/2007 9:05:44 PM   
luckydog1


Posts: 2736
Joined: 1/16/2006
Status: offline
Jay, we have massive staging bases in Germany.  They could certianly order us to leave and stop us from using places like "Ramstein" (its more than just a crappy band).  All 3 nations are helping us.  At this point we have the backing of the UN (go look it up, they gave us the mandate to occupy the place and keep renewing it) and the Iraqi government to be there.  Please put down the pipe and pick up a book.

(in reply to jaymckenas)
Profile   Post #: 240
Page:   <<   < prev  10 11 [12] 13 14   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: 9/11 non-sympathizers Page: <<   < prev  10 11 [12] 13 14   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.070