ShiftedJewel
Posts: 2492
Joined: 12/2/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
After a some number of years and interactions I have realized that with some partners or potential partners I am just struck by how beautiful—or sometimes ugly or just aesthetically uninteresting--their submission appears to be. I had never thought of it that way.. looking back though it seems that you are absolutely right. I've met submissives that, IMO, just didn't seem "submissive" enough to me, that or they were "tooooo submissive", if that makes any sense. quote:
Or for you does it seem unwise or just useless to conceive of a person's dominance or submission as a sort of a whole thing in itself that can be evaluated or even just experienced as beautiful, ugly, or somewhere in between? I wouldn't call it a waste, I'm starting to realize that yes, I do look at the "whole package", not necessarily the physical attributes or the intelligence level, but at all of it. I know submissives that I wouldn't waste the energy it took to pick up a flogger on but have been some of the most incredible "eye candy" I've ever met. In the same respect, I know submissives that under normal circumstances you wouldn't glance at twice, but the whole package, the attitude, the "grace-comfort-confidence-calm" as Isolde said, is all there and is awe-inspiring. quote:
I think, really, it is all a matter of taste, and self-awareness. Yes, there are boys who hold no interest for Me. And it has nothing to do with the physical appearance. it is in the attitude, the carriage, and the character. Dusty, you hit the nail on the head here. Just because one submissive isn't OUR personal ideal of submission doesn't take away from their submission. This thread has been a real learning experience for me. Thank you for starting it Noah. Jewel
_____________________________
Don't ask, trust me, you won't like the answer... no one ever does.
|