perverseangelic -> RE: Abstience-only sex ed. (7/29/2005 10:41:36 AM)
|
Emerald-I agree that there should be a relationship/sexuality context given to sex ed. However, I find that the sexuality bit is often left out of abstience only as well. I got a LOT of information on good ways to say no to your boyfriend, and LOTS about how to avoid situations where sex would be a problem, but little on how to deal with my own emerging (emerged?) sexuality. I wish we could figure out a way to put the good bits of the two together--information about how to deal within relationships along with accurate information about contraception and disease. Oddly enough, the best sex ed I got was in 5th and 6th grade at my private, fundamentalist christian school. We got all of the above-how not to have babies, but how sex was not a good thing unless you were married and how to say no. Of course, it was at a 5th grade level so I didn't get as much info as I really needed as an adolecent. Onceburned- I read that the law you mentioned is causing serious problems for abstience only states, becuase so many of their textbooks have factual innacuraces. And thank you for the info. My patner was -floored- that I didn't know that stuff, as I'm usually so level-headed about contraception/STD prevention. I am smarter now.
|
|
|
|