nyrisa -> RE: to pierce or not to pierce.... (10/7/2007 4:20:29 PM)
|
I had mine pierced about 2 years ago; the piercing was over very quickly, was just a flash of sharp pain (less than half as painful as stubbing my little toe on a doorstep, to give you a frame of reference); had no problems healing. I was not exceedingly happy with where the piercer lined up the holes, would have liked them back closer to the base. But I loved the look of the rings, and my nipples stayed erect constantly, and sensitivity was greatly increased. I was not much into nipple clamps, etc, anyway, so never tried that after they were done. I had to take them out a year or so ago, due to a series of hospitilizations for abdominal surgery, and not wanting to have to keep swapping the rings out for the retainers so xrays could be done. I had them redone about a month ago. It was more painful this time, due to tiny bit of scar tissue from the previous times. They were centered where I wanted them, and I got barbells this time, instead of rings. I do find the barbells more comfortable to wear, because the rings kept getting joggled up or down by moving or by clothes rubbing. The healing has been even faster this time, with no problems. If you get barbells, sizing is important. You want the bar wide enough to allow for a little swelling, and still permit a Q tip width between the bead and the nipple, so that you can clean adequately. The first bars the piercer put in were too narrow, and made cleaning uncomfortable, and gave me a constant "pinching" sensation. At 2 weeks, I went back, got bars 1/8" longer, and the problem was solved. I occasionally get the end of the barbell "nudged" by something, but have never had any bleeding or swelling. If your barbell is too long, it is going to run a much greater chance of getting caught on something. So, again, sizing is important. If anything is not comfortable afterwards, go and let your piercer re-check, and often it can be easily fixed.
|
|
|
|