meatcleaver
Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Sanity quote:
ORIGINAL: meatcleaver Let's get this clear, Iraq is not free, it is in a state of chaos due to the US trying to impose its vision on the country. I am sure the Iraqis would love to be free but the US has not freed them. 2 million in exile and another 1 million displaced and who knows how many dead is not freedom. US government policy is to pressure the Iraqi government into privatizing the oil industry and the US oil companies are in line to get the lucrative contracts.(Maybe US media doesn't report this) but there have been many members of the Iraqi parliament on TV over here angry with US pressure and questioning US motives. I didn't say my opponents were retarded, I said their thinking was retarded. We can argue about the English language if you want. How people can ignore the evidence of what has taken place, the lack of evidence supporting Bush's view and the number of people associated with Bush that have made big bucks is beyond me. Iraq is in a partial state of chaos as a result of having certain freedoms, meatcleaver. I suppose that Lucky is right, you'll probably always believe that the people of Iraq need a horribly bloody socialist dictator like Saddam Hussein in order to be truly "free". No I don't believe the Iraqi people need a bloody dictator to control the country but I don't believe you can impose an alien political system on a country either which was why Iraq existed and ended up with a bloody didctator and I don't believe the Americans have freed the Iraqi people either or care for their freedoms and wellbeings. We all know that the US having failed in their quest want to cut and run. quote:
ORIGINAL: Sanity If the democratically elected government of Iraq chooses to privatize their oil, so what? How is that "stealing" it. Even if the United States asked them to privatize their oil companies, it isn't the same as your earlier claim that George Bush (or America) is "stealing" Iraq's oil. Even if American companies are in line to buy some of it, your earlier claim was a hateful, emotionally charged attack and it was dishonest. The fact that you're now backing off of your (earlier) claim that we're "stealing" Iraq's oil only goes to further illustrate FHK's OP talking about hateful, emotionally charged rhetoric overtaking reason on the part of the Left these days. Finally, it's funny how you minced your words so delicately regarding your last "retarded" statement. Speak in more of a straightforward manner about things, and you won't find yourself having to do that in the future... Actually the original complaint about Americans wanting to steal Iraqi oil by pressurizing the Iraqi parliament into privatizing their oil and giving US companies lucrative contracts was made by IRAQI MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT. The suspicion of the world is that the Iraqi invasion was about oil, the US policy in Iraq is strengthening that suspicion.
< Message edited by meatcleaver -- 11/20/2007 1:50:24 AM >
_____________________________
There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.
|