undergroundsea
Posts: 2400
Joined: 6/27/2004 From: Austin, TX Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ShaktiSama I think waiting until she is twenty-one is an excellent idea. The time is not far off, it gives you some time to get used to the idea, and it was a reasonable boundary to set. <snip> And age 21 marks the passage into full adulthood and high-risk behavior in our society in other important ways. To speak in general, I think waiting until one is comfortable and prepared to have such a discussion with their child is a fine idea, be it before the 21st birthday or after. I don't think the age of entry into BDSM is 21. There are TNG groups and various BDSM groups across the country that allow persons 18 and over, an age policy with which I agree. Some local groups that have a 21 and over age restriction have it for alcohol related reasons. I recognize that with respect to media and sensationalism, should such an unwanted event occur, a policy of 21 and over is safer but do not think it is enough of a reason to deny entry to those who are over 18 but under 21. In my opinion, the issue at hand is not the age but the parent-child relationship. If I were at a BDSM munch and a 20 year old and then a 22 year old new submissive came to me and asked me questions, the two situations would not feel very different due to the ages alone. I expect I would be able to comfortably respond to the 20 year old on the spot. It is when the question comes from one's child that one needs time to reflect upon one's boundaries, or overcome whatever reluctance societal taboos create--the reluctance and boundaries are a result of our culture and its stance on sexuality. My two cents. Cheers, Sea
|