Lumus -> RE: Consequences...When? (12/19/2007 5:30:50 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LoveMyAussiePet When/What Circumstances do you discipline your submissive? Do you discipline them for ANY breach of your rules/expectations - regardless of explanation or circumstance? Do you discipline if you think it justifiable? Do you listen to your submissive if some form of breach is made, communicate back and forth and discuss? Or do you just whip out some form of punishment off the bat? Just looking for answers, not necessarily a "right" or "wrong" one. If you need food for thought heres a pair of different examples on different ends of the spectrum (at least in my eyes): Scenario 1) Sub is supposed to perform a specific task and fails to come through - How do you react? Scenario 2) Sub does something you dont particularly like, she assumes you wont like, but communication isnt possible (legitimate reason) so she doesnt know EXACTLY what your wishes might be - How do you react? Hmm. Lessee. They vary, most often punishment is meant for her betterment - it can be instructive, it can straighten her mindset...but I'm not of the school of thought that random whacking of heads accomplishes anything. I keep my rules simple as I can, and breach of them involves discussion first, not the whip. You never know if you've incorrectly communicated something, and it's better to learn first then whack and ask later. See above. Regarding the scenarios: 1. Too vague, as any task may be specific and still involve numerous different criteria. Failure to fill out the tax forms may be vexing but is probably not worth an ass-whuppin. 2. With dislike or distaste, preferably to create the venue for communication that allows the scenario to be resolved... Side note: I do get the vibe from this OP that the question is really, "Do you only punish your submissive when it's deserved, and by what criteria do you define 'deserving'?". Could be me.
|
|
|
|