krys
Posts: 611
Joined: 8/24/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MrThorns I'm not one who equates goreans to trekkies, but to answer your question... My dungeon is fully functional and very real. Play rape is a very real interest and an activity that I participate in. ~Thorns Perhaps the way I put this was a bit confusing. Firstly, I did not mean to imply that you personally were saying Goreans = Trekkies MrThorns, I apologize for any confusion this may have caused. I meant the whole general Goreans live fantasy lives theme. Yes, Gor is based on fictional novels. Badly written ones at that, I will definately concede that point. But living a Gorean lifestyle involves utilizing certain ritualistic behavior, patterns and training methods to acheive a certain mindset. Having a dungeon is creating a space to create a certain mindset. Play rape is using certain behavior to create a certain mindset. No, I do not actually live on Gor. I know that. No, you are not actually raping someone, you know that. So why, when Goreans engage in certain behavior to create a certain mindset, is it living a fantasy life, but when it falls under the more mainstream BDSM behavior, its healthy sexuality? I do not mean this as a challenge. I honestly want to know what it is that makes others view Goreans as so different from themselves. I get up in the morning, I set up my coffee maker to brew coffee for when Master will wake up. If its a workday, I pack his lunch. If its a weekend, I make breakfast. I lay out towels. I clean, I do laundry, I kneel at his feet. I submit to his will. When I get home from work, I wash my feet so he does not have to smell my stinky toes. (See, we don't fart flowers, some of us do go in another room first though.) :) So the positions I assume have certain names from a book. What makes people assume I live in some fantasy world? What makes me so different from any other slave kneeling at their Master's feet submitting to their will? As to Aristotle, observation is what philosophy is about. Its not a hard and fast science. Were his beliefs on the subject of astrophysics correct? No. Is he one of the greatest philosophers of all time? Well, I happen to believe so. As to a great many other people throughout history. But opinion, personal taste and belief are also not a hard and fast science. Astrology is a science of measurment and concrete physical facts. Philosophy is a science of thought. While the nature of the universe can be measured with a set of hard and fast rules, the nature of man is far more subjective. krys{Rk}
|