RE: Why not just make her wear a burkha? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


EvilGenie -> RE: Why not just make her wear a burkha? (12/26/2007 4:09:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave

quote:

ORIGINAL: EvilGenie castigate little me
Shame, shame, shame!! Even in Morocco, an Islamic country (with a 1% Christian and Jewish population) have females working at every level including high in the Parlimentary government and still I have never ever seen written such a load of shite there.
**edited to add: There is nothing here between the lines to read nor am I saying much of anything that isn't already clearly written here. Sorry folks, though I tire of quotes being taken out of context.


Evil Genie: I never said a word about limiting female aspiration simply because they are female. I pointed out accurately that in an advanced competitive economy a major problem exists with those aspirations. ie pregnancy
So.[sm=boxer.gif] you are reading between the lines. OK ? [sm=boxer.gif]


I replied to the original article posted and what the writer of said article had to say regarding the subject. I never replied directly to you though perhaps you had posted before me. My entire reference was to what the article from the Post Star had to say not you.  Cute little boxing guys though. [;)]




EvilGenie -> RE: Why not just make her wear a burkha? (12/26/2007 4:11:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3

quote:


Shame, shame, shame!! Even in Morocco, an Islamic country (with a 1% Christian and Jewish population) have females working at every level including high in the Parlimentary government and still I have never ever seen written such a load of shite there.


They all follow the same pattern and I don’t even know what any of this had to do with Muslim nations vs. the western world.
 
Maybe you’d like to ask her what comments people made here contained the most ‘shite’. I really don’t judge people on one post but rather a pattern of posts.



Perhaps because I was born and raised for 37 years in the US, have lived in several other countries on a few continentsin other cultures and have seen a more global view than many.




EvilGenie -> RE: Why not just make her wear a burkha? (12/26/2007 4:18:35 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave

EvilGenie: You speak of what pregnant women may or may not do or how they are treated  in Morocco.
In PC UK they can do anything up to and including assault if not murder their partner.

Its never their fault. I am serious.


I know you're serious. I lived in the oh so PC UK 1999-early 2004




kitttty -> RE: Why not just make her wear a burkha? (12/26/2007 4:47:01 PM)

How does the burka comment implicate Islam?

Generally it is fairly sexist muslims that demand that all women wear burkas, but it would seem that only a small fraction of muslims adhere to that form of dress.




lusciouslips19 -> RE: Why not just make her wear a burkha? (12/26/2007 5:01:54 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kitttty

How does the burka comment implicate Islam?

Generally it is fairly sexist muslims that demand that all women wear burkas, but it would seem that only a small fraction of muslims adhere to that form of dress.


Evil Genie never said islam was implicated. She did not name the thread and I dont believe her comment had anythig to do with the title. Just comparing countires views on pregnancy in the workforce.




EvilGenie -> RE: Why not just make her wear a burkha? (12/26/2007 5:13:02 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: EvilGenie

quote:

ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3

quote:


Shame, shame, shame!! Even in Morocco, an Islamic country (with a 1% Christian and Jewish population) have females working at every level including high in the Parlimentary government and still I have never ever seen written such a load of shite there.


They all follow the same pattern and I don’t even know what any of this had to do with Muslim nations vs. the western world.
 
Maybe you’d like to ask her what comments people made here contained the most ‘shite’. I really don’t judge people on one post but rather a pattern of posts.



Perhaps because I was born and raised for 37 years in the US, have lived in several other countries on a few continentsin other cultures and have seen a more global view than many.


The writer of the Post Star article is full of shite not a poster here, nor have I or would I ever make such a personal comment to any poster, even you, as to call them shite.





lusciouslips19 -> RE: Why not just make her wear a burkha? (12/26/2007 5:27:55 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: EvilGenie

quote:

ORIGINAL: EvilGenie

quote:

ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3

quote:


Shame, shame, shame!! Even in Morocco, an Islamic country (with a 1% Christian and Jewish population) have females working at every level including high in the Parlimentary government and still I have never ever seen written such a load of shite there.


They all follow the same pattern and I don’t even know what any of this had to do with Muslim nations vs. the western world.
 
Maybe you’d like to ask her what comments people made here contained the most ‘shite’. I really don’t judge people on one post but rather a pattern of posts.



Perhaps because I was born and raised for 37 years in the US, have lived in several other countries on a few continentsin other cultures and have seen a more global view than many.


The writer of the Post Star article is full of shite not a poster here, nor have I or would I ever make such a personal comment to any poster, even you, as to call them shite.




Uhh, Wasnt that just a typo.
" Full of shit" being what you meant. i saw it that way, But then again I'm not seeking to attack you for your beliefs or religion.




Termyn8or -> RE: Why not just make her wear a burkha? (12/26/2007 5:32:30 PM)

Now you have done it.

Humankind used to be nomadic. When that stopped several things happened. One of them was an agreement, possibly not even verbal, which provided for their mutual survival.

When Man and Woman finally got together and became monogamous familt creators there were certain extant facts. They had to build a house or soething and they needed food. During those decades or whatever of human development a few things were realized.

Someone has to go out and plow the field, and remember there was no powr, this was all manual labor. In the meantime someone discovered that nature had placed the breasts on the Woman's body, who had also born that offspring. As a Woman, think of being out in the field plowing and all the sudden it is feeding time. The field might be a milt from the house, and who is keeping an eye on the kids at that time ?

There was no Enfasmil, no formula, nothing of the sort. For the baby the only source of food was firmly attached to the Mother. Now just how practical is it for her to stop plowing and go feed the kids ?

Men did not do this, nature did it. Over the years the Man got stronger due to his required physical activity. At the same time Women refined their techniques to keep the home and hearth together. This was a natural progression, and possibly could be called evolution rightly.

Things have changed, to say the least. What actually made us Men and Women is fast disappearing. The natural forces that made us male and female will exist for quite some time, but there is something mising.

Over time, the Woman learned to cook things that her Man liked, and he thought of her and the kids as he toiled in the field. It became a symbiotis relationship, each dependent upon the other for their very survival, almost. A divorce or breakup was hard on both of them, it was no fun period.

This is all over now. In today's age of specialization, baby formula and diposable diapers, these roles are no longer valid. But their effects linger. Men are stronger on the average because of this. While he went out and plowed, hunted and gathered, the heaviest thing she lifted was a baby, or a sack of flour. She got good at it too, and Women were very effective for quite a long time. But times have changed.

We are now pretty much isolated from the pressures nature used to put upon us. Things are very different. We live in cities, which amounts to people living off of one another. There used to be pride among Men to bring home enough to invite the neigbors over for some eats and some good times. Similarly thwe Women would have pride in the wat she prepared the bounty. This is now rare save for very rare instances.

The traditional roles assigned to us by nature have become repugnant. An anethma. Women want to be Men and Men want to be Women. But what I have realized recently is that it is the entire human race in toto which is responding. We respond to conditions like any other organism. Yes we may temper it with intellect, but give it a try, your instinct will win near every time.

But this is all natural. Between homsexuality, chastity and other games people play, it seems that we are not all that interested in procreration anymore.I submit that this is a natural response, and it is not only responding to our subhuman condition, it is responding to the simple fact that there are too damn many people.

Back when I was studying psychology, I read a very interesting article that cut to the quick about overpopulation. I have it uploaded and I will find it for you. A very interesting read. Unfortunately OCR was worth shit so it is JPGs. But if you have braoadband it should not be a problem.

They dropped a certain species on an island, which had not much else on it. It was deer. There was very little fauna there, but the flora woukld support the deer. In the space of a few years they found the island to bo overrum with these deer. They shot a few and examined them. They found glandular changes, what they noted the most was a huge thyroid. Well they went away for another bunch of years and came back to find a normal, suitable herd of deer on the island. Again they shot a few and the research sees that they have normally developed, normal size thyroids.

In a very similar book (YPSE supplements) they did the same thing with mice or rats. They let them reproduce at will, and the test subjects had plenty of will. In a short time they were at each others' throats, literally.

I think something similar is happening to the human race, and not only is it not for me to stop it even if I could, it is not for me to try. I live my life based on what I want. I want a Woman, not a sub, or not at least a complete sub.

Our hardships in life are pretty much gone. Now maybe we have to give each other some hardships, or tests.

This is a very complex subject, and I simply can't cover it all right now. But suffice it to say, things are not what they seem.

Be well.

T




TMaster2 -> RE: Why not just make her wear a burkha? (12/26/2007 5:36:21 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave

How about small businesses who may not discriminate against women of child bearing age.
Employ a female labourer lol she gets pregnant and you have to employ another labourer and hold the female's job open if she chooses to take it. Nobody will know for sure, least of all the female.

If you ran a small business would you employ males, very reliable and hard working, or females.?
Only arskin.



I/we DO run a small business, and we prefer to employ females.  They are harder working, smarter, think on their feet a bit better, and more accountable than any male we've ever tried, which haven't been that many, so maybe our stats are skewed, but we've been happy.




EvilGenie -> RE: Why not just make her wear a burkha? (12/26/2007 5:39:22 PM)

No, I meant shite as I am 1st gen. Scottish American and also lived in the UK too long. I was referring to the original article posted here, not anybody here was my point as the person who quoted me believed I was referring to a poster here. I think everyone else got that I was making reference to the Post Star article except said person.




kitttty -> RE: Why not just make her wear a burkha? (12/26/2007 6:00:06 PM)

quote:


Someone has to go out and plow the field, and remember there was no powr, this was all manual labor. In the meantime someone discovered that nature had placed the breasts on the Woman's body, who had also born that offspring. As a Woman, think of being out in the field plowing and all the sudden it is feeding time. The field might be a milt from the house, and who is keeping an eye on the kids at that time ?



You are really really ignorant. Go to any single developing nation with traditional agriculture and see who is on the fields- it is women. Young mothers with infants on their backs. You know who watches the other kids? I can tell you because Ive seen it myself. Other women watch the kids. Its like primitive daycare.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125