|
laurell3 -> RE: Reading the comments on Anti-Lifestyles Media Campaigners (12/26/2007 8:07:40 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: hasbeenfool
Most of those responding have not bothered in addressing the issues raised in the first place, chosing instead to attack and change the subject.
I have posted responses to the early comments which many responders appear to have not read in their eagerness to prove their prowess in spitting out canned comments and messages.
Finally it appears a few of you out there are blind automaton supporters of media, any media, apparently under the illusion that any media group is Untouchable, possibly from all the "positive" images that shows like Jerry Springer, Oprah and a few others have done in "normalizing" BDSM as something as casual as bread and butter.
Thanks though to everyone who took the time to punch their keyboard. Oh and I am sure this publication is nothing of note, trouble is I NEVER had heard of it until now, possibly indicating they are starting to make inroads into the visible spectrum of public consumption.
Don't kick me if I have been a fool, I thought it was my future that I had slipped from my hand.
If you try to send a rock with a message attached to it, people are going to react to the rock that smacked them in the head and not the message attached. That's how people are.
However, I don't actually care whether there are anti-lifestyle groups out there. There are anti everything groups out there, the KKK still exists as do many other groups that exist for the shear purpose of promoting hatred and miseducation on almost every subject, why would the lifestyle be any different? Freedom of speech doesn't extend as far as coming on an alternate lifestyle board and insulting people of alternate lifestyles and expecting to hide behind it when those react. We're freaks, not stupid freaks [8D]. How silly can one get? Then again, I'm bisexual so, I guess I'm just a "faggot" anyway.
|
|
|
|
