RE: Faith to the faithless, a perspective (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


PrizedPosession -> RE: Faith to the faithless, a perspective (2/4/2008 7:42:01 PM)

quote:

I am just waiting for "them" to tell us something is wrong with the air.



Chem Trails




CuriousLord -> RE: Faith to the faithless, a perspective (2/4/2008 7:46:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MzMia

One day, I want to hear from a "non-Believer" their theory of creation.
A theory that will explain the other planets, stars, moons, galaxy, and all the
creatures, nature, human beings, etc. on this earth.


We have none; we believe in none.  Hence "non" before "believer".

I know so very little.


PS-  Actually, we have pretty generally accepted theories on evolution (for creatures and humans), the formation of galaxies, stars, moons, planets, etc.  But my point is that creation myths aren't the main thing.  Plus we're still relatively confused about what the universe was like a long time ago.  We have this whole "big bang" theory, but allow me to be honest and say that it's a vague theory.  We're not even guessing where things came from before that.  Maybe they were spread out, collapsed, and blew up there.  Maybe it's from a larger system.  Maybe it's something we can't even comprehend right now.  We just don't make up fairy tales about it.  :P




thompsonx -> RE: Faith to the faithless, a perspective (2/4/2008 7:48:00 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MzMia

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

MzMia:
Can we puleeeezzzz get back to you clutching my head to your bosom and consoling this heathen?[:D]
thompson


lol
I think there is hope for you!
I mean, WHO does not want to go to heaven?

I don't, I wouldn't know anyone there.


One day, I want to hear from a "non-Believer" their theory of creation.
A theory that will explain the other planets, stars, moons, galaxy, and all the
creatures, nature, human beings, etc. on this earth.
 
OK I will do it but first the "clutching to your bosom" thingie and don't stop till I am done "splanin' it"
 




MzMia -> RE: Faith to the faithless, a perspective (2/4/2008 7:55:15 PM)

lol
you silly goose.
 
 




thompsonx -> RE: Faith to the faithless, a perspective (2/4/2008 8:06:00 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MzMia

lol
you silly goose.
 
 

MzMia:
I just checked your profile...it does not say anything about you liking your tailpipe polished but I will if you like....but we gotta do the "clutching to your bosom" and so forth first....OK[:D]
thompson








MzMia -> RE: Faith to the faithless, a perspective (2/4/2008 8:16:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

ORIGINAL: MzMia

lol
you silly goose.
 
 

MzMia:
I just checked your profile...it does not say anything about you liking your tailpipe polished but I will if you like....but we gotta do the "clutching to your bosom" and so forth first....OK[:D]
thompson



DJ Mia is starting to spin tonight.
I am sending a shout out to you thompsonx.
YouTube - Eric Clapton - Tears in Heaven




LadyHathor -> RE: Faith to the faithless, a perspective (2/4/2008 8:16:15 PM)

...hmm been reading Austin Cline's blog?
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 




knees2you -> RE: Faith to the faithless, a perspective (2/4/2008 8:17:55 PM)

I don't think SugarMyChurro is running for office
here. Good thing too~ Whew[sm=horse.gif]
 
"Ask and you shall recieve, seek and you shall find.
Nock and the door shall be open."

 
As Always, Ant[sm=idea.gif]




sexyred1 -> RE: Faith to the faithless, a perspective (2/4/2008 8:21:46 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PrizedPosession

My agnostic beliefs are not because i was lied to or anything of the sort. i grew up in a home where my grandpa is an episocpal minister, his wife  is roman catholic, my other grandmother is buddhist and my other set of grandparents are both jewish. i grew up with so many things that it is hard to believe in one thing fully. Plus i like philosophy and kind of agree with existenisalism for the most part.
It's not the amount, if any,of faith that is what's important, it's being a decent human being.


-bobcat
But that's just me



I love that answer. Very cool.




Real0ne -> RE: Faith to the faithless, a perspective (2/4/2008 8:29:26 PM)

quote:

I would think logically, IF I were a Non-Believer, I would want really good facts and
evidence to back up my Non-Belief.


evidence?

is that fair?  Believers believe out of faith do they not?

a topic of this depth I usually do not persue on a fast moving board much less since i am on the wardens buddy list, but i can send ya something on the other side if you like.  There are alternative explanations that fit imo.




PrizedPosession -> RE: Faith to the faithless, a perspective (2/4/2008 8:29:44 PM)

Thank You and happy birthday! 




Real0ne -> RE: Faith to the faithless, a perspective (2/4/2008 8:32:10 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PrizedPosession

quote:

I am just waiting for "them" to tell us something is wrong with the air.



Chem Trails



good one!




DesertRat -> RE: Faith to the faithless, a perspective (2/4/2008 8:38:46 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
I read someplace that the last words on the cockpit voice recorders of crashed airplanes are...."oh shit"


And in pickup trucks, it's something like: "Hold my beer. I'm gonna try something."

Bob




hisannabelle -> RE: Faith to the faithless, a perspective (2/4/2008 9:09:09 PM)

greetings sugarmychurro,

for me, faith is comfort. it's something that helps me in how i live my life. it allows my ego to get out of the way and to let my more intuitive bits out. i honestly don't really care if someone wants to equate that with believing in santa claus - if believing in santa claus  had the same effect, i'd still do it :P (unfortunately, i've seen enough loss in my life and enough christmases without trees or presents to know that santa claus doesn't exist).

in my experience, many atheists and agnostics also are faithful - their religion is very atheistic science and/or making fun of people who do have faith. it becomes a practice all its own.

and to all, some thoughts i had while reading through the thread:

i don't believe in a childish god. i've always had that problem with the old testament. i'm still fuzzy on my concept of god, especially since i've embraced islam after being a polytheist for so many years and a buddhist as well (although that is more passive (a)theism, depending on how you interpret it), but reading about god in the qur'an was the most freeing thing ever (the first time i've ever actually connected with any monotheistic, omniscient, omnipotent idea of god). if there is a god, he is infinitely merciful, and i know that in my heart.

i think it's important to have faith, regardless of what you have faith in. personally, i'm not a big proponent of the one, right, and only way declaration. i think that people are walking the path they need to walk. i know many christians who would make terrible buddhists and many buddhists who would make terrible christians, but both religions claim to have a monopoly on the good and say that everyone should convert. personally, i think it's better to have faith in what you need to have faith in and let that enrich your life, rather than doing something because it's supposed to be right and ending up unfulfilled.

mzmia - my roommate cracked up when i said "oh my god" one day. she's like, "i thought you didn't believe in god!" (as in the judeo-christian concept of god.) i'm like, "i don't...but that doesn't mean i can't still take his name in vain!" most of us, even unbelievers and heathens (who don't believe in the more popular ideas, but believe nonetheless), still use oh my gods and god help me and for heaven's sake...because in the west, that's just the appropriate thing to do. it's a cultural thing. it just comes out.

another thing that bugs me is the fact that all atheists/agnostics/science obsessed anti religion types equate belief with judeo-christian religion. i've been pagan and buddhist for more than half of my life. it has been a very long time since i've even come close to possibly even maybe a little bit thinking about god the way he's talked about in judeo-christian tradition. ever. but i am more religious than most anyone else you will meet. i am superstitious. i'm one of those crazy people most of you wouldn't be able to stand...the difference is, i don't call myself a jehovah's witness and i'm a very competent scholar and i'm able to think outside of my own beliefs and worldviews, so most people tend to ignore the rest of me. but seriously. get over it. not every theist thinks divinity is a creator, an absolute, omniscient, omnipotent, or anything like that. just because you are still in therapy over your awful experience of christianity doesn't mean you have to blame the rest of us whose ideas of god are so far apart from that! sheesh.

quote:

Actually, we have pretty generally accepted theories on evolution (for creatures and humans), the formation of galaxies, stars, moons, planets, etc.  But my point is that creation myths aren't the main thing.  Plus we're still relatively confused about what the universe was like a long time ago.  We have this whole "big bang" theory, but allow me to be honest and say that it's a vague theory.  We're not even guessing where things came from before that.  Maybe they were spread out, collapsed, and blew up there.  Maybe it's from a larger system.  Maybe it's something we can't even comprehend right now.  We just don't make up fairy tales about it.  :P


curiouslord, that sounds a lot like how i think about it. heck, even most roman catholics believe in evolution, and they're considered among the worst of the believers. what's the deal? why am i ostracized? we're not that freakin' different. ;)

respectfully,
annabelle.




DomKen -> RE: Faith to the faithless, a perspective (2/4/2008 9:09:46 PM)

My own personal story. As a young child I was taken to sunday school where the nice parts of the bible were taught and the nasty and pornographic parts were ignored. I am a very curious person and a voracious reader so naturally around 8 or 9 I read the whole thing. It was awful, lots of stories were told twice and the details were different, how many of each kind of animal did Noah take on the ark? Any single number answer you give is wrong BTW. The story of Jesus is told 4 times and none of the 4 agree on the shared details, who exactly first saw Jesus after he rose? I had been taught this was the inspired word of god. That was obviously not correct. I was very confused but my sunday school teachers shushed my questions and ignored me.

Then the summer I was 9 two things happened. First I went to my grandmother's house for a visit and was able to get away without supervision. She was allowing a company to quarry limestone from a ridge behind her house and I wanted to see the big trucks. The bulldozer was fun for a few minutes but nobody was working that day so it was just sitting there and I didn't want to get caught on it so I started looking around. I found some very odd looking rocks. They looked a lot like these:
http://www.ukfossils.co.uk/images/LIVE/Somerset04/west8.jpg
http://www.catnapin.com/Fossil/Echinoidermata/unknown_crinoid_dorsal_cup_small1.jpg
I picked them up and put them in my pocket, I was very curious boy. I knew the quarry was off limits so I couldn't ask my parents what these were but I really wanted to know. So I took them to the library when I got home and started pulling out rock books trying to figure out what was going on. Having rocks on the table in a library is not a good way to remain incognito and I found myself under the scrutiny of a librarian who wanted to know where I got the fossils. I immediately thought she meant these were dinosaur bones, the only fossils I had any idea about. Of course they're not but she did help me find out what they were, crinoids: a kind of animal that grow on reefs. I was hooked. By the end of the summer I had read every book on the subject in the library. Paleontology remains a hobby and I can look up right now to my mantle amd see the meticulously cleaned crinoid stem and head that started it all.

Now the other event, my parents decided I was old enough to sit through sunday services with them rather than staying with the younger kids downstairs. I sat down in my best clothes and the minister proceeded to spend the next two hours informing us that we were all going to hell. A real fire and brimstone sermon. I of course had questions. My parents explained as best they could and told me to ask the minister the rest. So a couple of weeks later after services I asked him the only question that remained, who was he preaching to? All the adults were members of the church, i.e. saved/born again, and this was definitely a once saved always saved church.. There were perhaps 3 or 4 kids roughly my age who weren't yet baptized so was the whole thing for our ears? Why subject everyone else to this then? The minister was baffled. No matter how hard I tried I couldn't make any headway. He knew virtually everyone listening to him was not subject to any chance of hell but sermons had to fire and brimstone, you're all going to hell for your sinfulness stuff every week. He literally held two contradictory concepts in his head and had no conflict. I found myself in a quandry. Try as I might I couldn't make what I knew and what this guy was screaming every Sunday jibe. I did however stop paying much attention to the sermons and a lot more attention to the rest of the service, miss a cue to open a hymnal by daydreaming? With my mom right next to me? Only once. Which is when it became crystal clear, the whole service was structured around the "offering." Tithing correctly was a frequent subject of the little announcements made before dismissing church. It was all about money. From mthe day that realization to today I can't sit through a sermon without bursting into laughter at the absurdity of it. I make it through weddings and funerals with tranquilizers. Of course laughing in the middle of "lake of fire" or "the number of the beats" is unhealthy for a 9 year old. Until of course the third or fourth time it happened the minister came out to my moms car where she had just spanked me and grabbed me by the ear. The preacher immediately discovered that my mother was a lot stronger than she looked. When he demanded an apology from my mom she found a new church and I stayed home on Sunday.

Many years later I have yet to find any religion that doesn't ultimately set off my laughter. Some allow me to keep it under control, a quaker meeting hall is very serene even if the bible is still the center of the faith, An orthodox jewish cantor is a wonderful thing to listen to and rabbi's are mostly very well educated, much better than the aveage xtian minister, and discussing bible interpretation with them can be stimulating, budhism strikes me as claptrap of the worst sort, hinduism is fun poetry but true? please. But no faith has ever stirred me in the way a waterfall or a baby does.

As to the ultimate beginning of things, the moment before the Big Bang, we don't know and I think that is a heck of a lot more honest than claiming sky guy poofed it. But both have the same evidence so believe what you will on the subject. However the evidence for what happened since and how long it took is overwhelming so keep your 6 days and the two seperate accounts in Genesis, mutually contradictiry I might add, out of public school science classes.

Please don't pity me. I'm happy and healthy and quite enjoy my life. As to what I hope to say at the moment of my death, "I'm cumming!" is my preference. Barring that I'll go for rosebud.




MzMia -> RE: Faith to the faithless, a perspective (2/4/2008 9:20:00 PM)

Believe it or not, I am actually doing a little bit of work while I am online.
{not much, lol}

I meant to say this earlier, a slight rant on "organized religion".
You can Believe In GOD/Higher Power, {you insert name here}AND work
it out in a way that is comfortable for YOU.
I have not been in a church in a long time, but I pray every day and worship in
a manner that works for ME.
When I find a place of worship that I am comfortable with, I will probably join.

Many confuse having "Faith, Believing in GOD/or a Higher Power, and Spirtuality
with organized religiosity.

I actually meditate, practice yoga and embrace many of the Buddhist practices and
principals.

I have had to take bits and pieces of many ideologies to find a system that is working for ME.
I enjoy certain aspects of Christianity,Taoism, Confucianism,
Buddhism, Judiasm, New Age Spiritulism, etc.
I am an ecclectic Believer, with unchangeable core beliefs.

[:D]

To many are unable to think outside of the box, I am glad I am.[;)]
Namaste 




thompsonx -> RE: Faith to the faithless, a perspective (2/4/2008 9:33:21 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MzMia

To many are unable to think outside of the box, I am glad I am.[;)]
Namaste 

 
MzMia:
Perhaps that is my problem...I am always thinking about being in the box.[:D]
thompson









SugarMyChurro -> RE: Faith to the faithless, a perspective (2/5/2008 12:21:34 AM)

I was raised an atheist but I decided that being an agnostic was more honest. I don't know that god doesn't exist - I make no such truth claim. For once I find myself agreeing with CuriousLord, I am more certain of doubt than of any other thing. When you seek empirical data it's wise to start with a position of "I don't know, let's try and find out."

Bornsynner suggested that faith myths result from a desire to make order from chaos - but of course that's no less a thing than an imposition of a set of assertions on matters that are simply unknown. So I agree that there seems little point in that.

Bipolarber/Terry Pratchett's response was weak inasmuch as some of the things he would claim have no evidence to support their existence will probably have more support for what it is that they are exactly as science moves forward. Love is a biochemical activity that we are starting to unravel. The other two are more abstract concepts, but I suspect that they have a base in biochemical emotional states linked with other concepts like the "ethic of reciprocity." And the ethic of reciprocity is not really that abstract - in the jungle you find out in fairly short order that some activities are best engaged in cooperatively because they ensure a greater degree of success and overall survival. Whack someone in the head and they have a tendency to reciprocate, so it might be wiser to not act. But yes, it is like seeking evidence of wooden tools, a bit harder to come by because the even is more fugitive, more elusive.

As to the poetry of faith, I think serenity is a mental state that can actually be mapped although it remains controversial for the moment. In time, we shall know more about it than we do right now. No problems there.

But Sweet Zombie Jesus! - I do have better things to do than to worship the ghost of someone that wants me to symbolically drink his blood and eat his flesh so that I can attain eternal life!
http://forum.myredbook.com/dcforum2/User_files/jqx0zzhq213503c9.jpg

So I have less sympathy for this guy:
http://i142.photobucket.com/albums/r89/statuesk/Christianity.jpg

And more with the Pastafarians:
http://www.worth1000.com/entries/289000/289324rWyv_w.jpg

Carbo Diem!

[;)]





Zensee -> RE: Faith to the faithless, a perspective (2/5/2008 12:48:53 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MzMia

Thanks for the post Churro.
Do you want to know what many of US Believers Think about YOU Non-believers?

Not particularly but that's never stopped the faithful from burning us at the stake or whatever it takes to get us on side before.
 
We wonder who you believe created you?

Who? Why who? And which of the many who's? Why do I need to be created? Where is it written that... ohhhhh... right...


We wonder if you believe human beings and the Universe "just happened" from nothing.

This universe? Yes. Precisely. From nothing, without plan or purpose. Same place "god" came from. Is there a problem with that?
 
We often wonder what Non-Believers say when they breathe their last breath.

"Wow! That was cool. I wonder if there's anything more? Guess I'm about to find out." Asking people to believe out of fear of punishment following death, sounds distinctly like bullying to me."

Most of all, many of us feel very sorry for you.

At least we share one fruitless sentiment.

To live life with no Belief, must be sad and scary.

Not at all. I prefer a little knowledge to a whole bunch of bland guessing. Life is scary and wonderful. I don't need a holy book to tell me that. In fact, history proves that the world would be a lot less scary a place if it had no holy books at all.

I really can not even comprehend it.


Then how can you criticise it?

I am serious, I feel very sorry for you.

Really, it's not necessary. I'd rather be good because it's the right thing to do than because some chubby guy in red will give me consumer goods. And I'd rather thank my parents for their presents than some mythical pedagogue.









meatcleaver -> RE: Faith to the faithless, a perspective (2/5/2008 1:10:26 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

Moreover, the atheist is motivated as much by faith as the evangelical Christian--his belief is merely phrased in the negative rather than the affirmative.




Totally and utterly false and a lie spread by believers to justify their own position. I don't believe in god because I have never seen any evidence of god existing so why the hell would I believe in god?

In the same way I don't believe that pink faires live at the bottom of my garden and sprinkle stardust every night. My not believing pink fairies exist at the bottom of my garden is not a faith, I just have no reason to believe in them.

In fact if I really believed in pink fairies lived at the bottom of my garden, many people who believe in god would think I was nuts! Strange how they would never consider themselves nuts for a similar belief.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0703125