quote:


Would you also say that firefighters should be made to adopt children that they save from a building that the parents set on fire to get rid of the children?

I'm not sure if you're serious or not, but I'd love to tease you about this. ;)

I make this analogy, because in both cases, the parents had a way of "dealing" with an issue (via killing it), yet someone stops them from "dealing" with it in the "efficient" fashion.  In this case, the "issue" are the children, and you seem to be proposing that the people who prevent the "dealing with the issue" need to be the ones who take on the responsibility for "dealing" with it because they were the ones who objected to the initial "solution".

In the case I'm citing, the parents are burning down a building to deal with their children issue, and the fire fighters are stopping it against the parents' wishes.  Making the firefighters adopt the children here strikes me as rather similiar to making pro-lifer's adopt the children of other irresponsible individuals.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Darcyandthedark

quote:

ORIGINAL: faerytattoodgirl
i do.  almost everyone now is tribute or pro.  and couples want a 3rd to join them.  i dont read many male profiles though...unless they're part of the forum and i happen to click their name..  im speaking mainly of Mistress profiles.

We want a third?  When did that occur?
 
the.dark.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesertRat

Our national sphincter is puckering cuz our empire has peaked. I believe that's a good thing.

quote:

ORIGINAL: YourhandMyAss
I don't think military service should be mandated, I personally don't want someone on the job who don't want to be there and will do a half ass job and not care it's a half assjob.
do people really want someone who could care less about doing the job doing it?

quote:

ORIGINAL: MissHarlet
I believe you should have a permit to have a child/children and that it is only obtainable after a long series of  parenting class/classes......
I believe if you have one child and you need public assistance to raise that child you should be penalized for having more .. not rewarded by getting more money...( and I KNOW this one will get me flamed)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SophiaCorrupted

quote:


Would you also say that firefighters should be made to adopt children that they save from a building that the parents set on fire to get rid of the children?

I'm not sure if you're serious or not, but I'd love to tease you about this. ;)

I make this analogy, because in both cases, the parents had a way of "dealing" with an issue (via killing it), yet someone stops them from "dealing" with it in the "efficient" fashion.  In this case, the "issue" are the children, and you seem to be proposing that the people who prevent the "dealing with the issue" need to be the ones who take on the responsibility for "dealing" with it because they were the ones who objected to the initial "solution".

In the case I'm citing, the parents are burning down a building to deal with their children issue, and the fire fighters are stopping it against the parents' wishes.  Making the firefighters adopt the children here strikes me as rather similiar to making pro-lifer's adopt the children of other irresponsible individuals.

A firefighters responsibility, and livelihood is to save children in this instance. Their place in society revolves around saving these children. It is no one's responsibility, particularly not any nosy pro-life types, to control what comes and goes in my vagina  

quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelOfGeorgia

let's just launch the bombs and get it all over with...sort it out later

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelOfGeorgia

let's just launch the bombs and get it all over with...sort it out later

Where do you want to launch the bombs? (See: the love thread. Perhaps you have stuff you wish to contribute . )

quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelOfGeorgia

wherever the trouble is...just bomb them allllllllllllllllllllllllllllll