Clinton on NAFTA

Clinton on NAFTA (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

KenDckey -> Clinton on NAFTA (3/21/2008 6:24:35 AM)
Clinton has always opposed NAFT according to her campaign but it appears that White House Documents from Her Husband's administration indicate otherwise. http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/20080320/cm_thenation/1300860_1

Sanity -> RE: Clinton on NAFTA (3/21/2008 6:29:59 AM)
Politicians are funny that way, aren't they? For twenty years they can preach this way, then they decide to run for president and 'that way' becomes inconvenient for their campaign, so they change their tune like you or I might change hats... and the gullible so willingly buy in to it. quote: ORIGINAL: KenDckey Clinton has always opposed NAFT according to her campaign but it appears that White House Documents from Her Husband's administration indicate otherwise. http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/20080320/cm_thenation/1300860_1

pahunkboy -> RE: Clinton on NAFTA (3/21/2008 6:32:29 AM)
umm -on NAFTA we need Canada. In fact we need them more then we know. [natural resources]

KenDckey -> RE: Clinton on NAFTA (3/21/2008 6:36:30 AM)
I think this could just finish Hilary for good. Labor will have to withdraw their support or their membership will have cows - herds and herds of cows. LOL

Sanity -> RE: Clinton on NAFTA (3/21/2008 6:38:11 AM)
No, it's different for people like Hillary. It will go almost unnoticed. quote: ORIGINAL: KenDckey I think this could just finish Hilary for good. Labor will have to withdraw their support or their membership will have cows - herds and herds of cows. LOL

KenDckey -> RE: Clinton on NAFTA (3/21/2008 6:42:01 AM)
Sanity I am not so sure this time. It was brocast to largely. To hard to blow off after the remarks of a 3rd party minister made such a stink.

KenDckey -> RE: Clinton on NAFTA (3/21/2008 6:44:52 AM)
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080321/pl_nm/usa_politics_obama_richardson_dc_6 Seems that former Clinton people are evening shying from Hilary.

Sanity -> RE: Clinton on NAFTA (3/21/2008 6:52:58 AM)
I think people like Richardson are only coming out of the woodwork to endorse Obama now because it looks like he's sure to get the Democratic nomination. It's pretty much sealed up. For it to really have meant anything it needed to come earlier on. To say that was tied specifically to the NAFTA thing seems like a reach to me... were Hillary the clear party nominee, nary an ill word would be spoken of her amongst the Left, for any reason.

popeye1250 -> RE: Clinton on NAFTA (3/21/2008 7:41:34 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: KenDckey Clinton has always opposed NAFT according to her campaign but it appears that White House Documents from Her Husband's administration indicate otherwise. http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/20080320/cm_thenation/1300860_1 Well I've always opposed "NAFTA" and I'm sure I'm not alone. Six months after it was passed they were closing plants and shipping the machinary from those plants to Mexico and according to The Boston Globe; "The Clinton Admin. was counting that machinary as "exports" to Mexico." Unbelievable. This "NAFTA" thing has been a disaster right from the gitgo. Why do we need to wait for a new president to get rid of it?

Real0ne -> RE: Clinton on NAFTA (3/21/2008 7:45:26 AM)
when you start looking at these candidates it makes ron pauls short comings look insignificant dunnit? I mean near angelic! (cant have nayone like that runnin the country!

Page: [1]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125