Floggings4You -> RE: INSIGNIFICANT Progress... (4/12/2008 12:07:39 PM)
|
"Significant progress"...towards what? First, 'W' claimed that he wanted to enforce the UN sanctions against Iraq, the first time 'W' ever seemed to care about anything to do with the UN. Then, the US asked the UN weapons inspectors to leave, 'cause they couldn't find any WMDs. (Of course, Cheney said all along that he knew right where the WMDs were!0 Then, 'W' spent the next month telling the entire world that the US invasion of Iraq was eminent, and that our troops would locate and dismantle the Iraqi WMDs. (This gave Saddam plenty of time to disappear, after cashing in on the oil-for-food program.) Then, when thousands of troops couldn't find any WMDs, either, the White House states it was always about 'Regime Change'. But, once Saddam was captured, 'W says it was about 'brining democracy to the Iraqis'. (Never once did anyone question that it took the US Founding Fathers--men who were all equally committed to peacfeully forming a cohesive government--a decade to hammer out our Constitution; how on earth were the Iraqis--who were not all equally commited to any such venture--going to do it during the remainder of W's Presidency?) Now, God only knows what 'the mission' is, or what 'progress' is supposed to be made in Iraq, let alone how one could possibly figure out if such 'progress' is 'significant'...
|
|
|
|