RE: Dangerous champagne?

RE: Dangerous champagne? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Health and Safety

Message

Aileen1968 -> RE: Dangerous champagne? (4/19/2008 6:20:48 AM)
The champagne isn't the problem...it's all the strawberries that are squished up her that makes the unwanted goo.

GreedyTop -> RE: Dangerous champagne? (4/19/2008 8:10:32 AM)
god, I miss you, Sundowner... sigh

Sundowner -> RE: Dangerous champagne? (4/19/2008 10:36:26 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Aileen1968 The champagne isn't the problem...it's all the strawberries that are squished up her that makes the unwanted goo. Strawberries! Bugger. How could I have missed that as an interesting variation! And no no no - not unwanted goo - how could one think that; more interesting and satisfying dessert. <hugs Aileen> Thank you [sm=smile.gif]

MontrealPhoenix -> RE: Dangerous champagne? (4/19/2008 11:36:57 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sundowner quote: ORIGINAL: MontrealPhoenix quote: ORIGINAL: GreedyTop sniffles and wipes away a tear of admiration for MPs selfless sacrifice shrugs Well someone's gotta do it...okay I'm ready Sundowner bring on the champagne... Phoenix It really is moving isn't it GT - gets you right here - noble, not Nobel. I know it must be tough for you Phoenix and I wish there were some way of avoiding telling you you're going to be naked, tied spreadeagled on the silkiest of gentle sheets on the restful bed, your hips comfortably raised on a couple of pillows, a warm soft towel under your neat little bum, all in the warm glow of candlelight; but there's no way of hiding this harsh truth. All I can do is offer you a cigarette to calm your understandable nervousness and suggest a glass of the bubbly to relax you before we face your ordeal together. Sheesh I wish there were some other way kid, but we scientists have to pursue the cold reality of research without thought for ourselves. I am well aware of the ordeal i'm facing, but it happens frequently that one must suffer in order for the majority to benefit. The fact is that at this point the effects of pouring of champagne onto and into a woman's pussy and then licked out are unknown. Furthermore the number of times this may be done without before side effects appear is also unknown. Therefore studies must be done and therefore a live subject is needed. It's not fair to ask your slave to go through this ordeal, and as i'm presently unowned, i'm perfect for these studies. A glass of champagne beforehand would be much appreciated, lets save the cigarette for afterwards, shall we. Phoenix

xxblushesxx -> RE: Dangerous champagne? (4/19/2008 12:34:08 PM)
volunteers to be a guinea pony!

Sundowner -> RE: Dangerous champagne? (4/19/2008 4:49:17 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MontrealPhoenix I am well aware of the ordeal i'm facing, but it happens frequently that one must suffer in order for the majority to benefit. The fact is that at this point the effects of pouring of champagne onto and into a woman's pussy and then licked out are unknown. Furthermore the number of times this may be done without before side effects appear is also unknown. Therefore studies must be done and therefore a live subject is needed. It's not fair to ask your slave to go through this ordeal, and as i'm presently unowned, i'm perfect for these studies. A glass of champagne beforehand would be much appreciated, lets save the cigarette for afterwards, shall we. Phoenix Phoenix it's impossible not to be moved by your generous and brave approach to research. (I'd mention a detail point though - we're not talking mere slovenly "pouring" of bubbly into the delicious and delightful pussy; how lazy and boring is that! Essential to the process (I think we scientists must refer to it as a "process" to demonstrate our serious commitment, don't you) is that the fizz is squirted into the pussy from the mouth). But I'm now in a slight dilemna - my dear friend blushes is volunteering too, bravely and selflessly offering herself as a subject for the terrible ordeal. How now to choose, knowing that the subject will have to suffer so? Or should one seize the opportunity to improve the quality of the research by studying two subjects? If so, contemporaneously or consecutively? Sheesh - the agonies of indecision we scientists must suffer! Those for whom we tirelessly toil simply don't understand the sheer burden of it all.

xxblushesxx -> RE: Dangerous champagne? (4/19/2008 6:15:02 PM)
Go for the hat trick!

taraway -> RE: Dangerous champagne? (4/25/2008 7:24:59 PM)
Yeow! Hello yeast infection...

bliss1 -> RE: Dangerous champagne? (4/27/2008 10:28:32 AM)
If you have to douch - just keep a box of Summer's Eve handy. It is what I do. So far no yeast infections from champagne.

ResidentSadist -> RE: Dangerous champagne? (4/27/2008 3:49:16 PM)
A simple douche will restore the ph level. Buy several, they are cheap compared to good champagne.

parttimehotty -> RE: Dangerous champagne? (4/28/2008 7:09:28 AM)
[sm=chug.gif]How about getting her to cum in a glass of champagne THEN you drink it all down??

Sundowner -> RE: Dangerous champagne? (4/29/2008 12:58:55 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: parttimehotty [sm=chug.gif]How about getting her to cum in a glass of champagne THEN you drink it all down?? potty potty potty - we need to talk. It's the sensation for the sub that's a buzz (note caring way I put her first) and it's the delightful spending-time-with-the-pussy (I mean up close and personal) that is fun for me too. So swigging cum is fine, but not in the same league, and how the fuck do I get her to cum in a glass! (with enjoyment and dignity). I'm really sorry about this but it looks as if the only solution is to SHOW you what we're talking about [;)]

Page: << < prev 1 2 3 [4]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

3.027344E-02