Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

Sexual toys and the legislature


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Alternative Lifestyles in the News >> Sexual toys and the legislature Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Sexual toys and the legislature - 4/18/2008 8:31:02 AM   
MasterTimnchelle


Posts: 2
Joined: 7/25/2007
Status: offline
In the state that W/we live in (Alabama) they politicians are attempting to pass a law that makes it illegal to own, sell, possess or otherwise have in your home any kind of sexual toy, aid, etc.  One local merchant is trying to fight it all on her own with the help of several private citizens.  W/we are alarmed at the extent that politicians will try to invade yours', mine and O/our privacy.  Please support anyone trying to fight this law in O/our state and Y/yours'.  Thank you for listening....michelle (owned)
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Sexual toys and the legislature - 4/18/2008 11:02:41 AM   
xxblushesxx


Posts: 9318
Joined: 11/3/2005
From: Kentucky
Status: offline
But He *is* my sexual toy...

_____________________________

~Christina

A nice girl with a disturbing hobby

My femdom findom blog: http://www.MistressAvarice.com


(in reply to MasterTimnchelle)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Sexual toys and the legislature - 4/18/2008 11:15:41 AM   
Gwynvyd


Posts: 4949
Status: offline
Texas just repealed thier laws.. so that should go a long way in helping.. Get the ACLU involved.

Get out there and get petitions signed.

Some body has to be sane....

Gwyn

_____________________________

Self avowed Geek-Girl~
Come for the boobs, stay for the brains.

Be the kinda woman that when your feet hit the floor in the morning the Devil says "Oh shit, shes awake..."
~ Softandshy's "Shiney"

(in reply to xxblushesxx)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Sexual toys and the legislature - 4/18/2008 2:23:34 PM   
wulfgarw


Posts: 752
Joined: 3/18/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Gwynvyd

Some body has to be sane....

Gwyn


We're talking Alabama here...  This is the same state that state law mandates that pi = 3.15  I've lived there, and both sanity and intellegence are in short supply.

(in reply to Gwynvyd)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Sexual toys and the legislature - 4/18/2008 3:42:04 PM   
TheHungryTiger


Posts: 454
Joined: 3/9/2004
Status: offline
Gee, will ya look at that. Another 'kink as we know it is about to be destroyed by those evil politicians' panic atack. Has it been 48 hours already?

Ya know, without citing any sources all your post becomes is yet another 'foward this to all your friends' internet myth. Rminds me of those emails I get all the time screaming that congress is about to pass a tax on email unless we the people do somethign quick.

What you are probably refering to is the alabama anti-obscenity updates from 1998. (Oh my, 1998? This evil Bush dictatorship is traveling backwards through time to opress our freedoms.) And its not a ban on owning or possesing and dosent apply at all to what goes on inside your own home. It was only on the sale of sex toys. And even there there were excemptions in place if you could prove that the device was needed for treatement of a medical condition. Read it here if you can wade through all the legealize. http://www.legislature.state.al.us/CodeOfAlabama/1975/148424.htm Its article 4 division 5.

The person fighting it is Sherri Williams. They actualy have a name ya know, not just 'a local merchant'. They own the store 'Pleasures' in Huntsville and Decatur. Google on 'Williams v. Pryor' if you wanna read along. They fought the ban under the right to privacy. Somewhat similar to the ruling in the Extreme Associates case saying that if somethign in your own home is legeal, then it would be iligeal to ban the method for you to get it into your home. A federal judge agreed and the law was ruled unconstitutional.

Here is where it gets wierd.

The law was ruled as unconstitutional, however, it wasent removed from the books. Read that again. Make sense to you? Nope, me either. But the upshot of it was that there was a law on the books that couldent legaly be enforced. The stores that Williams ran remained open.

Well in april of 2003, Rep. John Rogers, D-Birmingham (ya know, one of those evil politicians who hate all forms of sex) introducted a bill into the state legestuature that would remove the unconstitutional parts of the law from the books. Just so that the law can be up to date with the enforcements of the court. Strangly enough, the bill didnt pass. The vote was 37-28 to leave the law on the books even though it wasent being enforced.

It didnt matter anyway, because the 11 circut cour of appels overturned the judges decision. The supreme court refused to even touch the case at all. Sensabal realy since the court was already hearing laurance v texas. Having two seperate anti-obscenity cases going at once just isnt historicaly somethign the supreme court does. They take the most important one going on at the moment and hear that.

But still, the law wasent ever enforced. Not only did williams stores remain open, but several strip bars as well as the store called 'Love Stuff' in Hoover, AL managed by Ross Winner had favoriable court statements in their favor that continued to block the law from being enforced.

Ya know, I own an adult business myself. And if it got to the point where I knew there was a law on the books againt what I did, but I also knew that the law wasent going to be enforced, I would chalk that up as a 'win' and call it a day. After all, there are laws on the books againt drivign a car unless you have a man on horseback with a lantern riding 15 feet in front of you. Thats also a law thats techinaly on the books but isnt being enforced and I dont see anyone campaigning to get that law pulled off the records.

But wiliams has an ax to grind. They took up the case all over again from the start. This time ditching the 'right to privacy' atack and instead going for a 'right to free speach' atack. (The dildos can talk?) And the whole thign started over again from scratch.

This thing has draged on for over a decade and is likely to drag on for another. And it has nothing to do with your right to own a vibe, just wether or not a store has the right to sell it to you. ..... But hey, dont let a little thing like facts stand in the way of a good 'Ack! Run for the hills! Kink as we know it is doomed!' style panic atack.


_____________________________

Bondage Ropes
High quality center-marked
bondage ropes and supplies.
www.kinkyropes.com

Ads by Goooooogle

(in reply to MasterTimnchelle)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Sexual toys and the legislature - 4/18/2008 3:48:38 PM   
TheHungryTiger


Posts: 454
Joined: 3/9/2004
Status: offline
quote:

This is the same state that state law mandates that pi = 3.15 .....

http://www.snopes.com/religion/pi.asp


_____________________________

Bondage Ropes
High quality center-marked
bondage ropes and supplies.
www.kinkyropes.com

Ads by Goooooogle

(in reply to wulfgarw)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Sexual toys and the legislature - 4/18/2008 4:57:44 PM   
Alumbrado


Posts: 5560
Status: offline
quote:

The law was ruled as unconstitutional, however, it wasent removed from the books. Read that again. Make sense to you? Nope, me either. But the upshot of it was that there was a law on the books that couldent legaly be enforced.


Wouldn't be the first time politicians refused to clean up after themselves.

(in reply to TheHungryTiger)
Profile   Post #: 7
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Alternative Lifestyles in the News >> Sexual toys and the legislature Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.102