beltainefaerie
Posts: 610
Joined: 4/15/2006 Status: offline
|
I'm having trouble seeing your point. Domestic partnership isn't marriage and if what you want is marriage, why would you stop fighting the battle to achieve it? The point isn't that people want to make policy in other states, the point is fairness and equality. I don't think that inventing a new term for a union can be passed off as equal. You seem to dislike the idea that separate isn't equal, but I think it really has a lot to do with both rationale for separation and the implementation of the policy. Separate could be equal, but it very rarely is. It simply isn't equal when a heterosexual couple get married and have their marriage acknowledged by the government, regardless of where they move, but a homosexual couple does not have the right to have their relationship validated by the government wherever they live. Domestic partnership isn't validated by everyone, but marriage has to be under the full faith and credit clause discussed above. It sounds like you really have more of a problem with the full faith and credit clause, which is a federal government issue, so why get all bent out of shape over California's government? California didn't invent the full faith and credit clause. Overall, I think our society would run better if, like in most countries, marrigage was something done by churches and civil unions were what the government issued license for and validated for everyone regardless of gender and orientation, but we are so attached to the word/concept of marriage here. (essentially it is the same thing, but for some "marriage" is a sacrament, hence the intense issue in some denominations with using that word and applying it to anything other than a heterosexual, monogamous relationship) Also, with regard to fishing licenses and the like, some things are separate due to other factors. What if they can only issue a limited number of fishing licenses in that are due to a decline in population of certain fish that effects the ecology. Suddenly a bunch of tourists come in with out of state licenses and begin fishing anyway, damaging the environment. There simply isn't a situation where my marriage, regradless of to whom, is going to directly effect the lives of others or cause any kind of ecological damage. I simply can't equate a marriage license and a fishing license.
|