Male chastity without a device

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

Male chastity without a device

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Health and Safety >> Male chastity without a device

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Male chastity without a device - 6/7/2008 7:45:57 PM

MistressSybella

Posts: 163
Joined: 9/14/2004
Status: offline

Has anyone tried a prince albert and guiche as a viable form of chastity? Someone suggested to me that a lock could be placed through the two rings, forcing the penis to wrap under. Sitting would be required when peeing, and so on. I'm interested to hear about any experiences with this method. Thanks!

Miss 'Bella
ServeMeWell

Profile

Post #: 1

RE: Male chastity without a device - 6/7/2008 9:45:39 PM

DreamyLadySnow

Posts: 359
Joined: 1/23/2005
Status: offline

I've thought about this many times. Not sure how practical it would be, as far as the position of the balls. It's a very sexy idea.

LS

(in reply to MistressSybella)

Profile

Post #: 2

RE: Male chastity without a device - 6/8/2008 12:44:33 PM

MistressSybella

Posts: 163
Joined: 9/14/2004
Status: offline

Well, yeah...exactly. The practical part is where I am unclear. I imagine, positioning isn't all that important, whether the member is wrapped over and forced between the testies, or on one side of the sack. In either case, it still wont be allowed to straighten, to an erected state. But what of a lock under there...peeing on it, the points rubbing the thighs, and so on? It's sexy in idea, yes, but. ;) I was hoping someone here had tried it.

Miss 'Bella
ServeMeWell

(in reply to DreamyLadySnow)

Profile

Post #: 3

RE: Male chastity without a device - 6/10/2008 10:30:32 PM

GimpinDenial

Posts: 1145
Joined: 4/20/2008
Status: offline

I have never tried this...
However, being chastized 24/7 that I am..I can see a few things that might make his life miserable (whether that is a good thing or not)

Normally, men get aroused at night. This alone can be powerful enough to cause stretching of the piercings (think of how some people can place a disk in their lobes getting bigger and bigger to stretch the hole)
As well as intense pain because there is really nothing preventing him from becoming erect, just not stand up (where as most devices block the erection from expanding) Because most men know that you can have an erection an still tuck yourself behind themselves....

Sitting can cause problems of extreme discomfort.

Chafing will be definite.

Personally, I think it would be great during scening, but as far as 24/7 chasity; I see sooooo many problems (or maybe I just think too much)

Just my thoughts, and I am sorry that I could not give any first hand experience of being chastized in this way.

(in reply to MistressSybella)

Profile

Post #: 4

RE: Male chastity without a device - 6/11/2008 1:09:00 AM

Rafters

Posts: 266
Joined: 3/9/2006
Status: offline

Translating it to plain English, you're connecting the underside of the end of a penis, to the muscle behind the scrotum, near the anal opening.

I suspect there may be one or two teeny tiny little risks you may not have considered.

Risk 1. The Prince Albert piercing while hooked into muscle, isn't hooked into a "very big" muscle. It can and does get ripped out, with not too much "pull" being used, on healthy flesh. "Meatotomy" "cheese cutter effect"
If the flesh is newly raw, or softened by infection, expect it to come out with the first decent blow job, and become a choking hazard.

Risk 2, Ditto the gauche. In fact more so, since the end of the penis happily dangling commando, is typically dryer and leathery than the area tucked between your butt cheeks and scrotum.

Risk 3. The scrotum changes size depending on temperature, stress level and how much sperm your body thinks it should produce. If is swells, it will push down on whatever linkage you use.

Risk 4. Penises when they engorge, straighten out. More importantly, when they swell, they don't necessarily interpret increased sensation from the penis area as being bad. You may be under the impression that an erection isn't dumb enough to continue straightening when it receives pain signals, you are wrong.

Risk 5. Straight penises don't bend. They are optimised to go in and out in a straight line, they don't corner well. If you try and bend a straight penis, you risk tearing a whole bunch of engorged blood vessels and "breaking" it so it doesn't work again.
Do not do what the poster above suggested and tuck it it to your butt crack
Here are some pictures, read the word's
http://www.ispub.com/ostia/index.php?xmlFilePath=journals/ijeicm/vol11n1/penis.xml

Risk 6. If the opposite occurs and the flaccid penis stays curved around the scrotum for too long, ie 23/7 . Then you run the risk of the skin sort of melting and "pressure sores" forming. If the melted skin stays in further contact, then the dry skin on the penis might reform with the dry skin of the scrotum around the septic areas, so the penis and scrotum fuse into one. This will require surgery to correct.

Risk 7. Thrush.

(in reply to GimpinDenial)

Profile

Post #: 5

RE: Male chastity without a device - 6/11/2008 6:11:16 AM

GimpinDenial

Posts: 1145
Joined: 4/20/2008
Status: offline

mmmkay...
I went to bed after my original reply...
Rafter brought up alot of what I was thinking (and there is soooo much more that runs through my head)
I have to agree with most of what he wrote.

Though a side note (and please, Rafter, do not take this as me saying "nuh uh!")
An erect penis does, however bend (think of the ninety degree angle the penis passes when receiving a deepthroat blow job) just when bent abruptly does it not respond well, as per your link (and might I add both the words "ouchie" and "growdy" for that visual display..lol)

Lastly, thrush is an oral infection that usally passes to other organs through contact when the fungus is untreated.
However, I understand that you used it simply to convey the possibility of an infection with the best possible example you could think of.

(in reply to Rafters)

Profile

Post #: 6

RE: Male chastity without a device - 6/11/2008 4:58:55 PM

MistressSybella

Posts: 163
Joined: 9/14/2004
Status: offline

Thank you kindly, all. I didn't think it was a great idea when it was suggested to me and you have confirmed it. Sexy but not practical, like I said. ;)

Still...if anyone HAS done it, let me know please.

Miss 'Bella
ServeMeWell

(in reply to GimpinDenial)

Profile

Post #: 7