candystripper
Posts: 3486
Joined: 11/1/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Maya2001 It is no different that saying you are seeking a male Dom rather than a female sub/male sub/ domme. You have made a perference choice that excludes a certain members of the population. Every one of us has certain personal preferences in what we find desirable/attractive stating your perferences is not the same thing as discrimination ..it is a means of being honest inorder to improve your odds of finding the traits you find appealing especially if what you seek is a relationship Myself being 5' 8" I am more attracted to tall men, I prefer a male with a bit of meat on their bones, but not overly overweight, muscular and broad shouldered, I do not find skinny males appealing.... colour is not that important a factor to me but it just happened to this point that of time I have only dated white or slightly olive complexions.... I prefer dominants over submissives, males rather than females...I also have a narrow age preference basically -3 to +10 of my age ..I prefer a Dom that has my best interest at heart and who respects me... intelligent and self assured other factor is income since I am seeking a relationship my preference is that they are earning close to what I do or better, it may seem crude to say income is a preference but common law laws here could leave me stuck paying support and give up part of my pension if a relationship of 6 months or more breaks down ...I do not wish to lose my home and part of my income if things go sour. It does not mean I would never chose outside of my preferences as 2 of my Doms where outside my physical preference but made up for that in personality. certain preferences are not fixed in stone but others are , having preferences is not discriminatory but a means to find a partner one finds appealing and desirable..... if one is not seeking long term life partners they generally would have far less personal preferences in their partners but even they have certain preferences whether it be gender, role, attitude Maya, it's reasonable to me to want a D-type (or s-type; i dun know what you seek) whose income is approximately the same as your own. I think it elimiates a lot of tension over money. However, you said this quote:
It may seem crude to say income is a preference but common law laws here could leave me stuck paying support and give up part of my pension if a relationship of 6 months or more breaks down.... Maya This is just not true, at least not in the U.S. There is no 'common law marriage' in any state I'm aware of anymore, and years ago, when it did exist, the couple had to engage in many behaviors that misled people to think they were legally married -- and this took time. It could never have been done in just six months. There have been suits for 'palimony', most notably Michelle Marvin vs. Lee Marvin circa 1977. These are contract disputes, in which one party alleges the other has breached a specific promise regarding property. By the way, Lee Marvin won in 1977. I'm certainly not asking that you take me at my word; I'm only mentioning it because if fear of property loss is dictating your choices to a significant degree, you may want to learn more about it -- I think your fears will be eased. candystripper
|