RE: Are You Attracted to 'Brats' or "SAMs'? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master



Message


sirsholly -> RE: Are You Attracted to 'Brats' or "SAMs'? (7/1/2008 3:20:43 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Level

quote:

ORIGINAL: sirsholly

quote:

ORIGINAL: Level


-

you are right...


[sm=agree.gif][sm=goodpost.gif][sm=imking.gif]

[8|]




Level -> RE: Are You Attracted to 'Brats' or "SAMs'? (7/1/2008 3:29:19 AM)

[:-]




sirsholly -> RE: Are You Attracted to 'Brats' or "SAMs'? (7/1/2008 3:30:36 AM)

Level...you are such a brat




MissIsis -> RE: Are You Attracted to 'Brats' or "SAMs'? (7/1/2008 3:35:07 AM)

No, I had enough trouble raising the ones I helped create.  I think is an absolutely deplorable condition in a male or female submissive in my eyes, probably worse in a male.  Personally, either way, I find nothing cute about that kind of behavior.   




KMsAngel -> RE: Are You Attracted to 'Brats' or "SAMs'? (7/1/2008 3:49:45 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: RavenMuse

No. ship em all to Australia for Focus to deal with[;)]


hey, not all of us are sams or brats over here!!

(says i who's not a sam and am safe in adelaide, lol)




dvart -> RE: Are You Attracted to 'Brats' or "SAMs'? (7/1/2008 3:56:40 AM)

I would rather own a Brat than a doormat.

If "Brat" = spirit then I'm all for it.

However if the Brat goes on being a pain in the arse having received a couple of pains on her arse, then she would have to be shown the door.

It's all a question of whether the dynamic is challenging or a waste of time.

In the end its really simple: I am a dominant, I dominate; You are a submissive and you submit.

You are welcome to your opinions, but I am the one who decides..........




Focus50 -> RE: Are You Attracted to 'Brats' or "SAMs'? (7/1/2008 5:52:26 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: RavenMuse

No. ship em all to Australia for Focus to deal with[;)]

Oi, leave me outa this...!!!!  lmao
 
To the OP, I like most things in moderation.  I've often said that I prefer a submissive who's playful, spirited and has a tough of mischief about her etc.  While that can occasionally manifest as brattiness, or at least be interpretted as such, the bottom line is it's the Dom who decides how much is too much.
 
Focus.




angelslave77 -> RE: Are You Attracted to 'Brats' or "SAMs'? (7/1/2008 4:40:27 PM)

I am most likely by many peoples definations a brat or as Sir calls me a "cheeky bitch"but i dont do it to recieve punishments or get attention, i am  by nature a sarcastic smart ass but i also know it has a time and a place and for the most part i am aware of and abide by those boundries. 




Huntertn -> RE: Are You Attracted to 'Brats' or "SAMs'? (7/5/2008 3:11:07 PM)

a full time brat no..I don't have the time to keep her in line...and frankly..as a adult my ass wiping days are over with....meaning  either I beat her silly or toss her ass out...but a part-timer brat..lol..yea at times its ok..but they sure as hell better be able to read me and know the mood is not ripe for that sh**.




ZenNihilist -> RE: Are You Attracted to 'Brats' or "SAMs'? (7/5/2008 3:50:01 PM)

I used to think brats were fun, now I don't have the patience. Brats only think of themselves, and they usually end up fucking themselves over when I walk away.







LadyPact -> RE: Are You Attracted to 'Brats' or "SAMs'? (7/5/2008 5:22:04 PM)

There are probably five questions on the board currently that have had this theme. 

No, I'm not interested in brats.  At the same time, I don't consider one a brat who is playful, or has a sense of humor, or has an opinion to offer.  The difference is, when the decision's been made, or something is going too far, and I've made that apparent, it stops.

As for SAM's.  I'll take the masochist any day, but the smart ass part had better be left at the door.




MrSpectacular -> RE: Are You Attracted to 'Brats' or "SAMs'? (7/5/2008 5:23:05 PM)

There is a certain appeal to brats initially - but it does wear thin pretty quickly. It is a bit like hanging out with someone who is sarcastic all of the time. The bratty behavior is something they have learned as a particular defense mechanism - in my opinion - To have a successful relationship though with a bratty sub is so difficult - I have tried and failed.  It felt like you had to penetrate this little shield around them before you got to know the real person.

Sincerely,

Mr S




Vestonika -> RE: Are You Attracted to 'Brats' or "SAMs'? (7/5/2008 5:27:30 PM)

brats are inconveniently dominant *fun* ...

or we are demanding and submissive..

*twinkle*

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

There are probably five questions on the board currently that have had this theme. 

No, I'm not interested in brats.  At the same time, I don't consider one a brat who is playful, or has a sense of humor, or has an opinion to offer.  The difference is, when the decision's been made, or something is going too far, and I've made that apparent, it stops.

As for SAM's.  I'll take the masochist any day, but the smart ass part had better be left at the door.





Duskwolf -> RE: Are You Attracted to 'Brats' or "SAMs'? (7/5/2008 9:17:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: HeavansKeeper

While I've told My Pet many times that I do not want a real life sex doll (an entity lacking any and all creation of her own) I also do not like brats.

Its cute if she pouts sometimes, or throws a SMALL fit when she wants to do something a better way because she knows I'd enjoy it more.

I love playfulness. I love growling. I love tackling. I love nuzzling and nibbling. I remember one time she was peeking her head out of the bedroom, asking me if I was looking, because she had to run across the house.

"Master, are you looking?!"
"..No Pet.."
"........(long pause).... You promise?"

I smiled.

What I do not abide is thanklessness. I ensure My Pet sees the lesson in everything, and is thankful for the little things. The things that many failed couples would have overlooked. So do I like brats? Only wanna-be brats =).

Also, what does SAM stand for?

Edit: SAM = Smart Assed Masochist?


Generally speaking, a SAM is only a problem as long as the behavior remains, if the behaviors can be addressed and adjusted to be more suitable, then I don't mind a SAM or two, it means they're learning... and that makes life much happier for both of us...

So a trait that fades over time is acceptable, but a recurring trait like that is undesirable, in my books.

tl;dr
HeavansKeeper, Good post... I agree. :)




Leatherist -> RE: Are You Attracted to 'Brats' or "SAMs'? (7/5/2008 9:20:29 PM)

If someone has to behave like a horse's ass to get my attention-they have already lost the game.




Battleflag -> RE: Are You Attracted to 'Brats' or "SAMs'? (7/5/2008 9:30:32 PM)

If whomever is with me is honest and true in their responses and reactions I don't think I could ask for more. 

If bratty or SAM is their genuine personality type and their ass can cash the check their mouths and actions write I'm a happy man.  Woe be the day those checks bounce.
  




happypervert -> RE: Are You Attracted to 'Brats' or "SAMs'? (7/6/2008 9:45:49 AM)

I think it depends on their attitude toward me, so as long as they're not disrespectful or trying to manipulate me then I don't have a problem with brats or sams.




ZenNihilist -> RE: Are You Attracted to 'Brats' or "SAMs'? (7/6/2008 12:33:48 PM)

I think what most brats don't understand is that they are going to get plenty of attention anyway.




Rafters -> RE: Are You Attracted to 'Brats' or "SAMs'? (7/7/2008 6:03:26 AM)

Sheesh, I can't believe with so many whips and chains ...and ball-gags ...and ginger ...and duct tape ...and things that can dissolve an otherwise solid brain into whatever body fluid's dribbling down their leg, available, people here have problems with backchat?

OK, I'll accept like Dom's, some percentage of subbies might just be irredeemable arseholes. (Present company excluded naturally)

But from my viewpoint, if your one true way isn't working on a person, and that person does want to achieve submission (That bit's kind of important) , then you need to change tactics.
Maybe they want a purely mental or physical experience, at the expense of all other aspects. Or they may be looking some aspect of your body, clothing, house, "dungeon", choice of car and neighbourhood, and feel too superior to be your inferior.

As a Dom you have a lot of cards you can play, but they all revolve about getting inside your subbies head, and working outwards.

The simplest way is just to ask them for a critique. If they want to play, its in their interest to tell you some truths about your techniques.
And to be fair, any technique hadn't cured brattyness after being used, could tactfully be considered a "not a one size fits all technique"
So "The truth hurts", suck it up.
If you're faulty, fix your faults.

If asking doesn't seem "Domly" or you want to know things they don't know themselves, then first read the critiques of mechanical "lie-detector" polygraphs, since these texts tend to teach the details better than the pro-polygraph texts. Realise they summarise to belief, temperature and muscle tension. Then continue the conversation with the subbie tied nude, blind, safely spreadeagled and with your gloved fingers resting inside any muscled orifice you feel appropriate.

Once you get practise, you'll realise "hot", "cold", "relaxed" and "tense" aren't metaphors but literal uncontrollable physical reactions by the imagination, to scenarios you bring up in their mind. The mouth can lie or spin things, but the body can't avoid betraying the subconscious reflex reaction to scenarios.

Now chat to them about possible future directions, play might take.
Personalise the BDSM checklist and link themes, so instead of single words like "flogging", try "how do you think you'd feel about being flogged? *pause* lightly? *pause* teasingly? *pause* hard? *pause* so hard you cry? *pause* do you like things soft? *pause* or hard?..."

Keep the chain of conversation on a single path that eventually covers every topic, so they don't have to think hard and thus tense answering the next question, due to the conversation changing context.
If an answer gives multiple paths to take, go forward and around in a figure 8 to get the next path(s), instead of reversing back and trying the second path.

During the pauses, pay attention first to what the body says, then what they consciously say using words.
The reflex muscle response comes instantly from the back of the brain, faster than an enemy ambush can pull a caveman ancestor from the gene-pool. While the newfangled civilised phrased are still being constructed by the front of the brain, tested for possible reactions, tweaked, retested and eventually spoken.
If the two responses vary, e.g a hot flush and relaxation, followed by a negative denial with words. Start teasing about how you've caught them out, how they can tried to keep a secret and failed. Why bother, you know them inside and out better than they do. "You know their dark secret(s)"
Do it enough times and they'll believe, then they'll let the words flow freely.

But keep moving around the topics. Don't stop and go deep. This method only works on simple yes/no questions. It breaks if you get overlapping emotions, so one thing at a time, each question flowing from the next obvious one.

Once you're done it once, shallow, then circle back round the topics of interest. Like clits, you don't don't go straight to the centre of each, but slowly circle them, gradually getting closer and closer, until the truthy centres reach out to you, instead of vice versa.

Take a break
Now have the long conversation

OK, now you have a better idea of what makes your "brat", tick.
What they really want and what they really don't want.
And they know you know.
And about now they'll start to feel the butterflies in their stomach

So do some thinking.
Thinking's good.
Think some more.
Now come back less ignorant than before and snap that little shits, bold display of defiance in half over your knee. And let them suck in so much subspace, that they won't doubt submission exists, that you've invented and patented it, and they will have to jump through any hoop you choose, if they ever dream of tasting it's divine ecstasy again.

And don't be an arsehole [:D]




sambamanslilgirl -> RE: Are You Attracted to 'Brats' or "SAMs'? (7/7/2008 8:17:24 AM)

hmmmm - will have to ask Daddy however i doubt He would be attracted if i was act like that all of the time. He knows i can be both sam and brat but never at the same time.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875