Shadow-tiger -> RE: Humans and machines merging (7/16/2008 1:16:43 AM)
|
Back in the day I loved the genre that took this to extremese. They called it Cyberpunk. These days the merging of human and machine is already happening. There are prosthetic legs that not only work as well as the origional, in some cases they're better. The time line from that article is rather fascinating. In my opinion it's not only optimistic, but a bit biased towards the idea that everyone is going to want the latest and greatest. Lots of tech out there that people grab up, but not everyone wants it. Usually just the people who can get the most use out of new tech, or the adherents who like living on the bleeding edge. FTA: By the 2030s, Kurzweil said, humans will become more non-biological than biological, capable of uploading our minds onto the Internet, living in various virtual worlds and even avoiding aging and evading death. In the 2040s, Kurzweil predicts that non-biological intelligence will be billions of times better than the biological intelligence humans have today, possibly rendering our present brains obsolete. Guess what, even if the tech is there I doubt very many people relative to the global population will even be in a position to take advantage of it. Add another fifty or more years to any of these numbers before one gets a real start at widespread acceptance. To me the single biggest change that can be made is improving overall health of the population, increasing the average life span. ETA: Come to think of it, the single biggest nanotech break through would be one that tweaked the human brain ever so slightly. Fewer mistakes, higher capacity for handling information. Never mind the medical possibilities. Never mind the completely fubar things an unscrupulous researcher could come up with ... as the article put it: Technology has always been a double-edged sword.
|
|
|
|