RE: Olymipics (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


snappykappy -> RE: Olymipics (8/24/2008 11:43:27 AM)

heck i think they should all be allowed to take steroids and bulk up and then have an early death if they want and let anyone at any age participate

heck even the divers are 14 why not the female gymnasts

heck lets not even have countries against countries just a free for all and everyone gets a medal for participating just like the special olympics

and lets us not have any tv coverage and it is free to everyone

see how stupid the sporting world has gotten and when a country spends too damn much on something like this they could have used it for something better in their country when others do not have

hey i am just venting guess it is the sarcoid i have

my apologies




FatDomDaddy -> RE: Olymipics (8/24/2008 12:07:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

It's not an excuse, baby, it's a fact. Athletes get doped up, because they need to: time to get over the delusion that it's all in the name of fair play and good sportsmanship.


Why do they NEED to?

Athletes get doped up because they WANT to.




kittinSol -> RE: Olymipics (8/24/2008 12:17:06 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

kittin, saying something is "necessary" is condoning it.



No, it isn't. Next [8|].




FatDomDaddy -> RE: Olymipics (8/24/2008 12:17:34 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: snappykappy

heck even the divers are 14 why not the female gymnasts


The IOC doesn't set the age requirements, the International Governing Body's for each sport does.

In Gymnastics the age was raised to 16 in the year of competition for any world event. The reason was the abuse of 1000's of almost world class gymnasts under 16 by coaches, parents and organizers and the international out cry against them.




thishereboi -> RE: Olymipics (8/24/2008 12:21:49 PM)

Next, ok....

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

It's not an excuse, baby, it's a fact. Athletes get doped up, because they need to: time to get over the delusion that it's all in the name of fair play and good sportsmanship.


This one sounds like condoning it also, unless of course your going to tell us, you didn't say this either.

I know, I'm picking on you...I'll stop.




FatDomDaddy -> RE: Olymipics (8/24/2008 12:26:22 PM)

I'm thinking it was too much wine and organ meats.




Raechard -> RE: Olymipics (8/24/2008 12:30:27 PM)

On the subject of timetables.

You'd think at least one of the US 4x100 track relay teams would have got through, they usually do that with military precision.

A shortage of personnel perhaps.[8|]




FatDomDaddy -> RE: Olymipics (8/24/2008 12:33:04 PM)

Poor coaching and diva sulking over losing to the Jamacians caused that.

Actually, the US Track and Field Team had a excellent meet away from the straight sprints.




christine1 -> RE: Olymipics (8/24/2008 12:35:25 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: colouredin

and im saying the once ina  blue moon, phelps, bolt, wiggins, hoy they are the reasons i watch the olympics, if i wanted to get bogged down in drama i would read about national conflicts, every day there are things like that to read about, newspapers thrive on reporting all the shit that we as human beings are capable of, whats wrong celebrating the occasions that there are actually people doing fantastic things?


i agree colouredin....it's really inspiring to hear some of the stories of the athletes and their loved ones.  the sacrifice and dedication needed is just amazing to me.  i'm now looking forward to the next winter olympics.




kittinSol -> RE: Olymipics (8/24/2008 12:36:31 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: cyberdude611

quote:

ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

[I wouldn't dream of raining on your national hero Michael Phelps' parade. Put your head in the sand all you like, though: perhaps you could make it into a sport discipline all of your own [;)]. 


Still can't get past that froggie defeat in the 4 x 100 freestyle can you sun kittin.


That was perhaps the biggest highlight of the Olympics....at least for swimming. Funny the French were actually trash-talking before that race.


Well, I'm glad to see that the wonderful fair play spirit of sports is alive and well on these shores: line up, they're going to award the Pierre de Coubertin medal for good sportsmanship :-) .




Level -> RE: Olymipics (8/24/2008 12:36:31 PM)

A good recap: http://sports.yahoo.com/olympics/news?slug=ap-medalsrace&prov=ap&type=lgns

quote:

BEIJING (AP)—China proved an acquisitive first-time Olympic host, topping the gold-medal chart with one of the most dominating and diverse performances ever. The United States, Britain and an array of small nations also had reasons to celebrate.

China’s haul of 51 gold medals was the largest since the Soviet Union won 55 in Seoul in 1988. Fielding athletes groomed since childhood in sports academies, it won medals in 25 different sports, including its first ever in sailing, beach volleyball and field hockey.

Not since 1936, when Nazi Germany prevailed at the Berlin Olympics, had a country other than the U.S. or the Soviet Union/Russia led the gold medal list.

The United States trailed well behind the Chinese in golds with 36, the first time since 1992 it didn’t lead the category. But the Americans did break their own mark for total medals in a non-boycotted Olympics; they won 110 in all, two more than their previous high set in 1992 and 10 ahead of China’s overall tally this year.

Britain, getting an early jump on its host role for the 2012 Summer Games, had its best Olympics in a century with 19 gold medals—good for fourth place behind the Russians. Its cyclists and sailors were the class of the field, and 19-year-old Rebecca Adlington stunned the swimming world with two golds in distance events.

It was also a satisfying Olympics for many of the world’s weaker sporting nations. A record 87 nations won medals, seven more than the previous high in Sydney in 2000, and a dozen nations won either their first-ever gold medal or first medal of any color.

If there was a prominent loser at the games, it was Russia, whose team was deprived of 10 athletes due to doping accusations. The Russians finished a distant third in both gold medals, with 23, and overall medals with 72—down from 27 and 92 four years ago in Athens. Germany and Japan also fared noticeably worse than in Athens.




FatDomDaddy -> RE: Olymipics (8/24/2008 12:41:52 PM)

"China’s haul of 51 gold medals was the largest since the Soviet Union won 55 in Seoul in 1988."
 
And look what happend to the Soviet Union!




Level -> RE: Olymipics (8/24/2008 12:43:00 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy

"China’s haul of 51 gold medals was the largest since the Soviet Union won 55 in Seoul in 1988."
 
And look what happend to the Soviet Union!


Yes, one can only hope lightning strikes twice.




kittinSol -> RE: Olymipics (8/24/2008 12:44:35 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy

"China’s haul of 51 gold medals was the largest since the Soviet Union won 55 in Seoul in 1988."
 
And look what happend to the Soviet Union!


Are you implying that a great deal of gold medals announces a country's demise? Because in that case, it's not only China that is beyond fucked [:D]. Just saying...




celticlord2112 -> RE: Olymipics (8/24/2008 12:44:49 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

kittin, saying something is "necessary" is condoning it.



No, it isn't. Next [8|].

Which dictionary are you using? 




Raechard -> RE: Olymipics (8/24/2008 12:51:30 PM)

My only regret is that I didn't see enough beach volleyball.
My other regret is that people that ride horses should not be given medals and any event where judging is required I don’t give the same respect as a sport where it’s clear cut who the winner is.




kittinSol -> RE: Olymipics (8/24/2008 12:52:42 PM)

You want to demonstrate that saying something is 'necessary' implies that one is condoning it? Be my guest, but you'll want to be mindful of hijacks :-) .

If it makes you happy, I'll even say that I condone the use of steroids and other performance enhancing drugs, since I don't give a flying duck's fuck either way. But this isn't what I was saying earlier: reflect upon this, if you will. Do you honestly believe that human beings could have reached the level of competition they have reached today without resorting to drugs? I certainly don't: therefore, drugs were necessary in achieving those results.




celticlord2112 -> RE: Olymipics (8/24/2008 1:01:20 PM)

quote:

Do you honestly believe that human beings could have reached the level of competition they have reached today without resorting to drugs?

Yes, I do.

The human body is a most magnificent mechanism when properly cultivated and trained.

Human potential is greater than you can possibly imagine.  It is unwise to ever sell it short.




Raechard -> RE: Olymipics (8/24/2008 1:06:42 PM)

One could ask if they were being pedantic about such things; how you can measure potential if you can't imagine it.
 




Alumbrado -> RE: Olymipics (8/24/2008 1:15:27 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

Well, I'm glad to see that the wonderful fair play spirit of sports is alive and well on these shores: line up, they're going to award the Pierre de Coubertin medal for good sportsmanship :-) .


You mean the L'Equipe Croix de Mensonge?




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875