Termyn8or -> RE: Beware SSRI's (10/16/2008 7:02:07 PM)
|
pix, fine and good. "Clearly, they needed more help than they were getting" Thanks for helping make my point, at least part of it. I have always known that thoughts as well as moods can affect the chemistry of not only the brain, but other parts of the body as well. And I have known what seratonin is since before some people on this forum may have been born. (18 or over, the math is right). Seratonin is very involved in higher cognitive thinking, and at least in the past, the levels normally dropped as people aged. Back then the researchers figured that it was almost like a brain booster, and in some ways produced the opposite effect than ADD or ADHD. In fact at least one study found that LSD and certain related chemicals increased the seratonin levels. Back then they weren't studying the receptors all that much, they looked at the levels and drew conclusions from those data. I can't say anything they conclude is correct, and even in the past that was true. But if the modern information available jibes with the old research, one might conclude that the seratonin levels are simply too high in some people. If this is true it lends way to a less invasive method of control, simply reduce the overall level of seratonin. It can be done, and the receptors could be left alone and it would more resemble an antibiotic. That is if the previous assumption is correct. I think if the various receptors are carefully shielded from influence, and just the overall level is reduced, a therapist might get a clearer picture of what he has to deal with. I have already backed off of my original position "Don't take them unless you are suicidal" because mainly of the responses here. However the main tenet of my opinion is only abated, not changed in direction.I think the use of SSRIs should be very sparing in nature, prescibed only by those who understand the mind a bit, instead of a GP. If someone would develop (they might have) a drug that lowered the levels overall, I think it would be a better solution in the long run and that could be prescribable my a GP. The problem here is that they do know alot more now about how the brain works, and now they think they know everything. They also think the solution to all problems is a drug. They are screwing around in the chemistry of the brain and they cannot predict the outcome. I solve problems for a living, and I know about "shotgunning" which is when you just apply two or more solutions and hope for the best. But in my view that is a last resort, only to be used when all logical means have been exhausted, and that means that you simply can't get any more trustable data to target the problem effectively. However they prescribe them like candy. To me that is analogous (using the insulin metaphor) to taking a borderline diabetic and putiing him on insulin right away, with no examination of diet or cause. There are dietary factors that are proven to cause diabetes. Yes there are other causes, but under certain conditions I can GUARANTEE that you will get diabetes. Of course genetics is always at play in this issue, and is actually something the medical community likes to avoid it seems. And to actually rebut my expression that insulin and SSRIs are not comparable, something I do from time to time, they are both misregulation of a hormone/enzyme whatever. Now I wonder if there could be a dietary connection. I have a set of theories on that which is too broad to express here, I would have to start another thread. However I doubt that anyone could disprove that a misadjusted diet could lead to many diseases, and that most of them will be related to a hormonal imbalance or something of the sort. Maybe this sounds far fetched to many, but far fetched were many advances in science of all kinds. What I have seen change in my lifetime, because my education still hasn't ended after over thirty years, that research now tends to focus more on micro issues than on macro issues, in this sense macro meaning one's environment. Maybe my views, which are the result of over thirty years of learning, preclude the possibility that we will ever completely agree, but know this buddy, we don't completely disagree either. Even some who seem to disagree actually agree that SSRIs are overprescribed. But then I think everything is overprescribed. They wanted to give the olman Lipitor bacause his cholesterol was 180. That is ridiculous, he refused it and ate less processed meat, a bit less grease, more veggies. Why didn't his doctor tell hm to do that ? Just so you know where I am coming from, I think they are doing a crappy job at medicine and reaping undeserved profits. I think this extends to every corner of the profession, including research. And it's not all the worker, like the doctor or researcher as much as what they are told to do. A researcher is told : "Prove this" A doctor is told : "Prescribe this" In no way do I want to generalize that statement to include every professional in the field, but I think it is pretty much standard operating procedure. No cites or quotes here, just look at what they do. From my perspective, I wonder who the drug pushers really are. I have already, however stipulated to the fact that some may really need SSRIs, just like some really need insulin. But my point is, how many do not, and how much harm is it doing ? I will refrain from calling your opinion illogical and absurd (probably due to normal seratonin levels) :-) but I will say this. The body of human knowledge was not built in a day, but for some reason some think it was. What worked a long time ago worked, or else we wouldn't be here. Also note that sometimes these old illogical and absurd ideas are proven not to be so with modern science. Some homeopathic remedies have been proven to be more effective and safer than modern medical treatment. Not all that many, but look what they had to work with. It was a different way of thinking, one day I will write about it. Most people think differently now, and I think that is part of the problem. One day future generations will look at our history and say "damn they were stupid", and in turn the same thing will happen to them. They might be stupider than us though. Generations of the past would never allow what is going on these days. T
|
|
|
|